Black_Shire,
You are reasonably free to say what you want here but would it not be more useful when you disagree with R. Fry's contributions that you defend your position with facts rather than demeaning comments?
My experience for over 30 years in ham radio and almost 50 years with part 15 AM has been that the theory (which you appear to shun) does predict within reasonable accuracy the experimental (which you apparently advocate) performance of radio transmitting stations.
It is a good idea to compare theoretical predictions with expermental observations and I have found that they both work together in advancing technology. I suggest you share your experience with us and let R. Fry share his theory based information so we can all benefit from both.
Neil
You are reasonably free to say what you want here but would it not be more useful when you disagree with R. Fry's contributions that you defend your position with facts rather than demeaning comments?
My experience for over 30 years in ham radio and almost 50 years with part 15 AM has been that the theory (which you appear to shun) does predict within reasonable accuracy the experimental (which you apparently advocate) performance of radio transmitting stations.
It is a good idea to compare theoretical predictions with expermental observations and I have found that they both work together in advancing technology. I suggest you share your experience with us and let R. Fry share his theory based information so we can all benefit from both.
Neil