FRR said:I'm a little disappointed with the new PM channel. I think they would have been better off if it had been Beatles channel. So much of what they are playing on PM most of us have never heard. Thoughts anyone?
FRR said:I think they would have been better off if it had been Beatles channel.
I agree with both sentiments.Mike Sheridan said:I...like being able to hear songs I've never heard before.
FRR said:Anyone heard when the McCartney channel goes bye bye?
CTListener said:FRR said:Anyone heard when the McCartney channel goes bye bye?
When McCartney's label stops slipping the envelopes stuffed with C-notes under the door.
FRR is really asking is:FRR said:Anyone heard when the McCartney channel goes bye bye?
From The Bridge page http://www.xmradio.com/thebridge:FRR said:Anyone heard when the McCartney channel goes bye bye?
davalvideo said:Anyone hear the concert at the Apollo on Monday? Missed it and wanted to know how Macca sounded...
It effected some earlier radios wierdly. My SkyFi (or maybe it was the SF-2, don't remember) did not benefit, nor could it pause, RW, FF, or store anything on pops or FT.JohnnyElectron said:...it would have been nice if XM had taken the bandwidth of 3 different channels, merged them, then put 'pointers' on those 3 channels to ONE WIDE bandwidth stream with some nice HD CD-quality audio (like XM's Fine Tuning used to have).
sirius1 said:Paul has lost his voice, after all it's been 30 years since "Wings Over America" and he was basically doing the same tunes, which, by the way, sounded very burnt out. I love Paul McCartney, but like Elton John, he's lost his range and can barely hold a tune.
davalvideo said:Anyone hear the concert at the Apollo on Monday? Missed it and wanted to know how Macca sounded...
I expected at least a small avalanche of responsesai4i said:When are they going to take the shears to the channel?
ai4i said:I expected at least a small avalanche of responsesai4i said:When are they going to take the shears to the channel?![]()