• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Payola Focus Turns To Major Radio Conglomerates

http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=1591155&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

Payola Focus Turns To Major Radio Conglomerates
New York State Attorney General Conducted Two-Year Probe

By BRIAN ROSS, RICHARD ESPOSITO and VIC WALTER (ABCnews.go.com)

Feb. 7, 2006 -- ABC News has learned the focus of a two-year-long payola investigation by the New York attorney general is turning to the nation's nine largest radio conglomerates.

Attorney General Eliot Spitzer says evidence he has gathered clearly shows some of the radio conglomerates have participated in the illegal practice of accepting payments from record companies and middlemen for guaranteed air play for certain songs.

"The behavior has been unethical, improper, illegal and a sanction of some severity clearly should be imposed," Spitzer told ABC News chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross.

Spitzer and music industry officials told "Primetime" that millions of dollars in payments, gifts and trips are exchanged each year to get music stations to add songs to their weekly play lists.

Spitzer says record company documents obtained in the investigation of Sony Music and Warner, both which have settled with the attorney general, reveal payments for songs that became major hits, including Jennifer Lopez's "I'm Real" and John Mayer's "Daughters."

Other artists whose songs are named in the documents Spitzer has obtained include Jessica Simpson, Celine Dion, Maroon 5, Good Charlotte, Franz Ferdinand, Switchfoot, Michelle Branch and R.E.M.

Spitzer says much of the money went directly to corporate bottom lines, unlike payola scandals of previous decades when individual disc jockeys and program directors received the money.

"We have people in suits coming in with documents rather than cash payments under the table to a DJ," Spitzer said.

The nine radio conglomerates that have received subpoenas from the attorney general are Clear Channel, Infinity (now CBS Radio), Entercom, Emmis, Citadel, Cumulus, Cox, Pamal and ABC.

The nine companies together control several thousand radio stations across the country. In statements to ABC News, five of the companies say they are cooperating with the attorney general's investigation and take the matter seriously. The other companies have not responded to requests for comment.

A number of other independent radio stations are also under investigation, according to state investigators.

In conducting a probe of payola, banned by federal law, Spitzer has assigned himself the role of hit man to the hit makers, using state consumer fraud and bribery laws to go after the practice.

The Federal Communications Commission says it is closely following the New York investigation, although Spitzer says the FCC has yet to move forcefully.

"I would like to see the FCC more directly involved in addressing what is very clearly a payola scandal that has run rife through the industry," Spitzer told ABC News.

Virtually all investigations into radio practices, since the last payola scandal in the 1980s that implicated organized crime figures, have withered on the vine and vanished.

Spitzer's probe could be the most comprehensive to ever hit the industry. Warner Music Group has entered a settlement and contributed $5 million to charity as part of that agreement. Sony music settled for $10 million. Warner and Sony both agreed to cease any questionable business practices and to comply with Spitzer in his ongoing probe.<P ID="signature">______________
"The only thing that sustains one through life is the consciousness of the immense inferiority of everybody else, and this is a feeling that I have always cultivated."
---Oscar Wilde</P>
 
Will the last person out the door at terrestrial radio please remember to turn out the lights (assuming the power company hasn't already done so by that time), cuz it sounds like the party's OVER!

http://abcnews.g> o.com/Primetime/story?id=1591155&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
>
>
> Payola Focus Turns To Major Radio Conglomerates
> New York State Attorney General Conducted Two-Year Probe
>
 
> Will the last person out the door at terrestrial radio
> please remember to turn out the lights (assuming the power
> company hasn't already done so by that time), cuz it sounds
> like the party's OVER!
>
> http://abcnews.g>
> o.com/Primetime/story?id=1591155&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
>
> >
> >
> > Payola Focus Turns To Major Radio Conglomerates
> > New York State Attorney General Conducted Two-Year Probe
> >
>
The story was also(with an interview with Spitzer) on CBS NEWS. It's nice to see this investigation and I hope Infinity plus Clear Channel pay dearly BUT keep in mind Spitzer is running for Governor Of New York.
 
You know, the interesting thing is that the record companies continue to operate in a business model that was created in the 1950's, and little has changed. Their reluctance to change is amazing! They completely missed the technology boat a few years ago and were unceremoniously DUPED by Napster and the others! Had they embraced the technology from day one, buying music today would be very different, as well as their bottom line which is bleeding worse than a Saturday night club go-er on Denton Drive in Dallas.

Anyone who's had anything to do with Programming a music radio station knows that although no one would publicly admit it, payola exists, it has for years, it comes in many forms, and it is almost impossible to stop.

This is not to say that ALL programmers or music directors participate. Few however would turn down an offer of a free lunch or dinner at an exclusive restaraunt...a trip to a showcase in New York or Los Angeles or Vegas...front row seats to the latest hot show in town...CD players or IPOD's as "giveaways to listeners"...all technically - PAYOLA.

Ask yourself, how many record company represenatives would bestow any of these "gifts" if you did not play any of their music? Many would argue that these gifts are gratuities for a mutually positive "relationship" that occurs everyday in business. True, other industries surely do this sort of thing.
What some may not realize it that there are some in these record companies that truly would do anything "under the table" to get an artist played. The companies have sunk tons of money in new artists specifically and are very eager to see a return! If the music makes a dollar, they take the expenses straight off the top. If it doesn't, guess who picks up the bill for all those meet and greets, lunches, dinners, showcases, etc?

Some would say these "gratuities" have no influence on their decision to add a song to their playlist.


All together.... R I G H T !
 
> What some may not realize it that there are some in these record companies that truly would do anything "under the table" to get an artist played.

I don't support Payola, by any means.

But, on the other hand, if I were working for a music company, I would Never trust today's brand of PD to figure out which music the audience is going to like. I might even figure the only way to ensure my best stuff gets played is to pay these nit-wits off.
 
> You know, the interesting thing is that the record companies
> continue to operate in a business model that was created in
> the 1950's, and little has changed. Their reluctance to
> change is amazing! They completely missed the technology
> boat a few years ago and were unceremoniously DUPED by
> Napster and the others! Had they embraced the technology
> from day one, buying music today would be very different, as
> well as their bottom line which is bleeding worse than a
> Saturday night club go-er on Denton Drive in Dallas.
>
> Anyone who's had anything to do with Programming a music
> radio station knows that although no one would publicly
> admit it, payola exists, it has for years, it comes in many
> forms, and it is almost impossible to stop.
>
> This is not to say that ALL programmers or music directors
> participate. Few however would turn down an offer of a free
> lunch or dinner at an exclusive restaraunt...a trip to a
> showcase in New York or Los Angeles or Vegas...front row
> seats to the latest hot show in town...CD players or IPOD's
> as "giveaways to listeners"...all technically - PAYOLA.
>
> Ask yourself, how many record company represenatives would
> bestow any of these "gifts" if you did not play any of their
> music? Many would argue that these gifts are gratuities for
> a mutually positive "relationship" that occurs everyday in
> business. True, other industries surely do this sort of
> thing.
> What some may not realize it that there are some in these
> record companies that truly would do anything "under the
> table" to get an artist played. The companies have sunk
> tons of money in new artists specifically and are very eager
> to see a return! If the music makes a dollar, they take the
> expenses straight off the top. If it doesn't, guess who
> picks up the bill for all those meet and greets, lunches,
> dinners, showcases, etc?
>
> Some would say these "gratuities" have no influence on their
> decision to add a song to their playlist.
>
>
> All together.... R I G H T !
>
Have any of you reading this ever been to your local grocery store? As you go up and down all the different isles and see all the many items displayed for sale. Do you realise that the makers of all those goods pay the store to put them there on those shelves? And the more the makers pay the better the location on the shelves they get! Whats the difference between that and what happens at your local radio station group? I think the AG and the FCC worry too much!!!! The public could care less! The AG is just trying to make a name for himself and as was said above he is running for governor you know!!!!!
 
Re: Payola ...

> Whats the difference between that and what happens at your local radio
> station group? I think the AG and the FCC worry too much!!!!
> The public could care less! The AG is just trying to make a
> name for himself and as was said above he is running for
> governor you know!!!!!


I think that the public does care, as is evident by the decline in CD sales over the past years. It had nothing to do with Internet file sharing... it had to do with the fact that the music that is being force fed us (we the people) was complete crap. The major labels are pumping out carbon-copy pop divas, cloned boy bands, easily reproducible hip-hop acts, and an endless run of psuedo-punk pop-rock bands. They have to pay (in one way or another) to get this tripe aired because they know that we (we the people) wouldn't want to hear it more than once. They also know that if they can get Ashlee Simpson's latest single repeated enough, that the relatively malleable minds of twelve-year-old girls will assume that it's good "cuz it's on the radio so much" and they will buy the CD so they can be cool like the popular skinny girls.

You tried to equate paid shelf space at a grocery store with payola, and it's a very bad analogy. A store may sell space on an end cap, but they still carry the competing brands in the store. Payola guarantees air time for a label or artist at the expense of other - quite possibly good - artists who did not pay.

I'm not necessarily a music snob, but if you look at the list of artists whose music may be involved, it don't take a rocket surgeon to figure out why they needed to pay-for-play...<P ID="signature">______________
"The only thing that sustains one through life is the consciousness of the immense inferiority of everybody else, and this is a feeling that I have always cultivated."
---Oscar Wilde</P>
 
http://abcnews.g> o.com/Primetime/story?id=1591155&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
>
>
> Payola Focus Turns To Major Radio Conglomerates
> New York State Attorney General Conducted Two-Year Probe
>
> By BRIAN ROSS, RICHARD ESPOSITO and VIC WALTER
> (ABCnews.go.com)
>
> Feb. 7, 2006 -- ABC News has learned the focus of a
> two-year-long payola investigation by the New York attorney
> general is turning to the nation's nine largest radio
> conglomerates.
>
> Attorney General Eliot Spitzer says evidence he has gathered
> clearly shows some of the radio conglomerates have
> participated in the illegal practice of accepting payments
> from record companies and middlemen for guaranteed air play
> for certain songs.
>
> "The behavior has been unethical, improper, illegal and a
> sanction of some severity clearly should be imposed,"
> Spitzer told ABC News chief investigative correspondent
> Brian Ross.
>
> Spitzer and music industry officials told "Primetime" that
> millions of dollars in payments, gifts and trips are
> exchanged each year to get music stations to add songs to
> their weekly play lists.
>
> Spitzer says record company documents obtained in the
> investigation of Sony Music and Warner, both which have
> settled with the attorney general, reveal payments for songs
> that became major hits, including Jennifer Lopez's "I'm
> Real" and John Mayer's "Daughters."
>
> Other artists whose songs are named in the documents Spitzer
> has obtained include Jessica Simpson, Celine Dion, Maroon 5,
> Good Charlotte, Franz Ferdinand, Switchfoot, Michelle Branch
> and R.E.M.
>
> Spitzer says much of the money went directly to corporate
> bottom lines, unlike payola scandals of previous decades
> when individual disc jockeys and program directors received
> the money.
>
> "We have people in suits coming in with documents rather
> than cash payments under the table to a DJ," Spitzer said.
>
> The nine radio conglomerates that have received subpoenas
> from the attorney general are Clear Channel, Infinity (now
> CBS Radio), Entercom, Emmis, Citadel, Cumulus, Cox, Pamal
> and ABC.
>
> The nine companies together control several thousand radio
> stations across the country. In statements to ABC News, five
> of the companies say they are cooperating with the attorney
> general's investigation and take the matter seriously. The
> other companies have not responded to requests for comment.
>
>
> A number of other independent radio stations are also under
> investigation, according to state investigators.
>
> In conducting a probe of payola, banned by federal law,
> Spitzer has assigned himself the role of hit man to the hit
> makers, using state consumer fraud and bribery laws to go
> after the practice.
>
> The Federal Communications Commission says it is closely
> following the New York investigation, although Spitzer says
> the FCC has yet to move forcefully.
>
> "I would like to see the FCC more directly involved in
> addressing what is very clearly a payola scandal that has
> run rife through the industry," Spitzer told ABC News.
>
> Virtually all investigations into radio practices, since the
> last payola scandal in the 1980s that implicated organized
> crime figures, have withered on the vine and vanished.
>
> Spitzer's probe could be the most comprehensive to ever hit
> the industry. Warner Music Group has entered a settlement
> and contributed $5 million to charity as part of that
> agreement. Sony music settled for $10 million. Warner and
> Sony both agreed to cease any questionable business
> practices and to comply with Spitzer in his ongoing probe.
>


If Warner Bros. paid to get R.E.M. on the air the past few years, they sure got ripped off.
 
Re: Payola ...

> > Whats the difference between that and what happens at your
> local radio
> > station group? I think the AG and the FCC worry too
> much!!!!
> > The public could care less! The AG is just trying to make
> a
> > name for himself and as was said above he is running for
> > governor you know!!!!!
>
>
> I think that the public does care, as is evident by the
> decline in CD sales over the past years. It had nothing to
> do with Internet file sharing... it had to do with the fact
> that the music that is being force fed us (we the people)
> was complete crap. The major labels are pumping out
> carbon-copy pop divas, cloned boy bands, easily reproducible
> hip-hop acts, and an endless run of psuedo-punk pop-rock
> bands. They have to pay (in one way or another) to get this
> tripe aired because they know that we (we the people)
> wouldn't want to hear it more than once. They also know
> that if they can get Ashlee Simpson's latest single repeated
> enough, that the relatively malleable minds of
> twelve-year-old girls will assume that it's good "cuz it's
> on the radio so much" and they will buy the CD so they can
> be cool like the popular skinny girls.
>
> You tried to equate paid shelf space at a grocery store with
> payola, and it's a very bad analogy. A store may sell space
> on an end cap, but they still carry the competing brands in
> the store. Payola guarantees air time for a label or artist
> at the expense of other - quite possibly good - artists who
> did not pay.
>
> I'm not necessarily a music snob, but if you look at the
> list of artists whose music may be involved, it don't take a
> rocket surgeon to figure out why they needed to
> pay-for-play...
>
EXACTLY BINGO! The music industry has done nothing in creating excitng music. Its a "Pop muzak." There is so much product out there that have been determined by the recording industry as not being good enough to promote. Some are little known bands Like The Doors, Pink Floyd,Cream,etc. So where can one get them? They download it and often on free file sharing systems. So I am not sympathetic with the industry in the least. They have blown it.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom