• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Peacock to drop all free access

According to Cord Cutters News, which cites a Reddit post (caveat here), even Comcast customers will have to pay for Peacock starting in late June.
 
According to Cord Cutters News, which cites a Reddit post (caveat here), even Comcast customers will have to pay for Peacock starting in late June.
This is mainly for Comcast customers, but the free version will eventually be cut completely.
Interesting. As a Comcast customer the only time we logged on to Peacock was for the last 2 Olympics. The level of Peacock we got for free with our Xfinity subscription allowed us to watch all the Olympic events and contests via On Demand, skip the fluff, interviews and commercials and just watch the competition, which we appreciated.
 
I thought the whole idea of free Peacock was to get eyeballs on the ads. Apparently that is not working? So when they start charging, does that mean you have to pay to see the ads. Fortunately, not much on Peacock worth watching.
 
With the sharp increase in prices the first of the year and now this, Comcast says "we're a monopoly and screw you".
Pretty much. With the rate increases that kicked in this past month, our Comcast subscription has jumped $30/month over the past 2 years. I called them last week to ask if there was anything we could do to reduce our bill. They asked if they could bundle my cable and cell phone. I cannot because I need AT&T for cell service, and the Comcast offering uses I believe Verizon's towers. They asked if they could bundle my home internet. I cannot because we get free high speed internet as part of our HOA fees. Beyond that they explained they had nothing to offer unless I wanted to reduce the number of channels I get. He said my basic cable is $30/month, and I get the sports package so we can get our RSNs for baseball and basketball, we get another "entertainment" package which gives us channels like HGTV and the Food network, which we watch. He explained our total cable bill for services is $80/month and the other $53 is all taxes and fees which he cannot adjust. So basically my options were to 1) Cut one or more packages to reduce the number of channels I get, 2) Get rid of the cable boxes I have so the monthly cable box rental goes away and I'd need to log onto my Comcast account via my cell phone, tablet or SmartTV to watch TV that way, or 3) Suck it up and continue to pay the man.

In other words, they're much less willing (or able) to try and lower monthly cable bills than they were in the past, even when you threaten to cut the cord and go elsewhere. Right now, it's still best for us to stick with Comcast, but if rates rise again or if the whole mess with Bally Sports and RSNs takes those off cable and causes us to pay to stream our major league sports teams, then we'll consider ditching Xfinity for sure.
 
Interesting. As a Comcast customer the only time we logged on to Peacock was for the last 2 Olympics. The level of Peacock we got for free with our Xfinity subscription allowed us to watch all the Olympic events and contests via On Demand, skip the fluff, interviews and commercials and just watch the competition, which we appreciated.
I watch Peacock mainly for Premier League soccer and the Sunday MLB games. I watched some of the Winter Olympics but am more interested in the Summer Games. No interest at all in skiing, which Peacock shows a lot of, or rugby, again overrepresented. I'm not into TV series or movies anymore, and the live channels on Peacock offer nothing I can't find elsewhere. I'll wait to see what the monthly subscription fee will be before I decide whether to continue with Peacock as part of my Xfinity Flex service. Flex, incidentally, costs only about $50 and includes internet service plus all sorts of free TV, movie, music and radio content via apps.
 
Pretty much. With the rate increases that kicked in this past month, our Comcast subscription has jumped $30/month over the past 2 years. I called them last week to ask if there was anything we could do to reduce our bill. They asked if they could bundle my cable and cell phone. I cannot because I need AT&T for cell service, and the Comcast offering uses I believe Verizon's towers. They asked if they could bundle my home internet. I cannot because we get free high speed internet as part of our HOA fees. Beyond that they explained they had nothing to offer unless I wanted to reduce the number of channels I get. He said my basic cable is $30/month, and I get the sports package so we can get our RSNs for baseball and basketball, we get another "entertainment" package which gives us channels like HGTV and the Food network, which we watch. He explained our total cable bill for services is $80/month and the other $53 is all taxes and fees which he cannot adjust. So basically my options were to 1) Cut one or more packages to reduce the number of channels I get, 2) Get rid of the cable boxes I have so the monthly cable box rental goes away and I'd need to log onto my Comcast account via my cell phone, tablet or SmartTV to watch TV that way, or 3) Suck it up and continue to pay the man.

In other words, they're much less willing (or able) to try and lower monthly cable bills than they were in the past, even when you threaten to cut the cord and go elsewhere. Right now, it's still best for us to stick with Comcast, but if rates rise again or if the whole mess with Bally Sports and RSNs takes those off cable and causes us to pay to stream our major league sports teams, then we'll consider ditching Xfinity for sure.
Municipal broadband is rolling out, despite Comcast's lobbyists and a Tennessee GOP's best efforts. It'll be awhile before we get it where I live but I can't wait. Their cable packages don't seem any cheaper though. We cut to the bare minimum cable channels. My wife is missing new episodes of Pioneer Woman and her other cooking shows, and will probably miss a lot of NASCAR. I don't care that much but it still sucks, though Fox Weather (streamed via YouTube) isn't that bad (surprisingly).
 
wasn't Peacock the only one of the big 8 (Paramount +, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, HBOMax, Disney+, Discovery +, Peacock) streaming services to offer the product in a free version. i could see why they are ending the free ride, they are in the business to stream, streaming's the new basic cable.
 
It'll be interesting to see how it all shakes out in the long-term with the many streaming services. The whole idea of people "cutting the cord" and ditching cable and Dish came about because pricing was getting out of hand and they wanted a more affordable way to see the programming they were interested in. Discovery+ took a lot of their programming and old episodes that were once available free on their website, and now charge to see all of it (and a lot more) on their paid platform. Other stuff like sports contests that could once be watched for free via the web are also now on paid streamers - and it's gotten to the point where, if people really want to see all the programming they once got with cable, they need to subscribe to multiple streaming services, each with a cost, and it's kind of defeated the purpose of cord cutting. In many other situations, some programming is only available via streaming and it's not even available on cable/dish, so even cable subscribers need to pay extra to see content they're interested in.

While some services are doing OK, a few have already been taken down, others aren't doing great financially and have taken measures to reduce costs, and yet others have started to combine so you can get access to a few different platforms for 1 price. I still consider streaming to be somewhat in it's infancy - it'll be interesting to see how that business transforms and adapts, as well as the consumers.
 
What we may see eventually is an attempt by the television industry as it has existed for the past few decades put the genie back in the bottle, put toothpaste back in the tube, unring the bell ... whatever cliche you want to use for returning to the pre-internet days, when the customer's only viewing choices were over-the-air, cable and satellite. Will it work? Maybe, especially if the nation plunges into a prolonged recession.
 
The one thing Peacick probably has in its favor with Comcast customers is Comcast will pribdnky have subscribers opt out of peacock and start charging everyone instead of having subscribers opt in to paying for Peacock. If this is the case many subscribers will probably not cancel Peacock.
 
Could NBC/Universal capture all U.S. national media rights to the NBA and make the package (including playoff games and the Finals) exclusive to their Peacock streaming service, meaning that there would be no nationality telecast NBA games on NBC, CNBC, USA Network, Telemundo, or any "traditional" linear TV service?

On the one hand, making the NBA streaming-exclusive to Peacock might result in an increase in subscribers, as it would be the only place to see NBA national telecasts and the NBA Finals.

But on the other hand, there might be a tremendous outcry were the NBA (except for a handful of games of a couple of teams in a couple of markets that might remain on over the air TV) to vanish from broadcast TV.
 
Could NBC/Universal capture all U.S. national media rights to the NBA and make the package (including playoff games and the Finals) exclusive to their Peacock streaming service, meaning that there would be no nationality telecast NBA games on NBC, CNBC, USA Network, Telemundo, or any "traditional" linear TV service?

On the one hand, making the NBA streaming-exclusive to Peacock might result in an increase in subscribers, as it would be the only place to see NBA national telecasts and the NBA Finals.

But on the other hand, there might be a tremendous outcry were the NBA (except for a handful of games of a couple of teams in a couple of markets that might remain on over the air TV) to vanish from broadcast TV.
The NBA wouldn't do that, at least not yet. To do so now would be suicide. There's still more than enough value to being on over-the-air and cable networks that a complete move to Peacock would be a non-starter for Adam Silver.
 
Could NBC/Universal capture all U.S. national media rights to the NBA and make the package (including playoff games and the Finals) exclusive to their Peacock streaming service, meaning that there would be no nationality telecast NBA games on NBC, CNBC, USA Network, Telemundo, or any "traditional" linear TV service?

On the one hand, making the NBA streaming-exclusive to Peacock might result in an increase in subscribers, as it would be the only place to see NBA national telecasts and the NBA Finals.

But on the other hand, there might be a tremendous outcry were the NBA (except for a handful of games of a couple of teams in a couple of markets that might remain on over the air TV) to vanish from broadcast TV.

Which is EXACTLY why the NBA (And the other sports leagues) aren't going anywhere (And the NFL will insist the streaming rights to Sunday Night Football be moved to the NFL.com app)
 
The NBA wouldn't do that, at least not yet. To do so now would be suicide. There's still more than enough value to being on over-the-air and cable networks that a complete move to Peacock would be a non-starter for Adam Silver.
Plus the NBA has a deal with ESPN. That gives them access to ESPN+ & even Hulu if they so desire

So, without a deal with NBC to begin with, what would they want with Peacock??
 
Plus the NBA has a deal with ESPN. That gives them access to ESPN+ & even Hulu if they so desire

So, without a deal with NBC to begin with, what would they want with Peacock??
a home to replace the dying RSNs as Bally's Sports parent company Diamond Sports group file for bankruptcy and Warner Brothers Discovery's AT&T Sports Net will file for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy at the end of the month. pretty much, if the RSNs die, then one of the streaming services like Peacock could end up airing games that are meant to air on RSNs on their platform, but they gonna have to either air the games nationally without increasing all Peacock prices or air the games regionally with a Geolock where the stream is only available in the markets the teams air on (for example, Dallas Mavericks vs. Los Angeles Lakers, game is only available in North Texas and Southern California and the secondary markets the teams cover in other neighboring states) with no extra price for regional games but the rest of the NBA games nationally would stream for a additional fee where you have to pay extra to get out of market games (basically a streaming only version of NBA League Pass out of market PPV service on Satellite and Cable).
 
a home to replace the dying RSNs as Bally's Sports parent company Diamond Sports group file for bankruptcy and Warner Brothers Discovery's AT&T Sports Net will file for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy at the end of the month. pretty much, if the RSNs die, then one of the streaming services like Peacock could end up airing games that are meant to air on RSNs on their platform, but they gonna have to either air the games nationally without increasing all Peacock prices or air the games regionally with a Geolock where the stream is only available in the markets the teams air on (for example, Dallas Mavericks vs. Los Angeles Lakers, game is only available in North Texas and Southern California and the secondary markets the teams cover in other neighboring states) with no extra price for regional games but the rest of the NBA games nationally would stream for a additional fee where you have to pay extra to get out of market games (basically a streaming only version of NBA League Pass out of market PPV service on Satellite and Cable).

No

What would likely happen is the AT&T SportsNet group (Which is MUCH SMALLER than the Bally Sportrs group) would simply become NBC Sports regional outlets on cable & satellite with streaming available on Peacock in those areas only

As far as I know, AT&T SportsNet doesn't compete in with NBC Sports like Time Warner SportsNet does in LA (And even then, I doubt NBC Sports California even reaches that far south anyway)

In any event - What Comcast/NBC DOES NOT want to do is rebuild the old Fox Sports Net
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom