Having lost touch with any formal or informal groups to critique my patents,
I would ask if anyone will take the time to review the work for which I and a partner were granted
2 US Patents. We were sure we had one, but the USPTO found two, one for the circuit, and one for a specific application.
It appears to be a standard class a DC amplifier, but uses a pentagrid mixer in a unique way to create a far more sensitive electrometer.
It also seems the infinitesimal DC grid current leaps off the probe at 25 volts, far lower than all prior art shows possible.
One of the patents I cited as surpassing in this class was licensed to NASA, for lauch tower monitoring.
Two patent review objections and irrelevant prior art were overcome.
Either 6982549 or 7071674 into a google search brings it up. Both read the same, except in claims.
I would appreciate comments, conjecture, and challenge of my ideas, even though these were granted a while ago.
I would ask if anyone will take the time to review the work for which I and a partner were granted
2 US Patents. We were sure we had one, but the USPTO found two, one for the circuit, and one for a specific application.
It appears to be a standard class a DC amplifier, but uses a pentagrid mixer in a unique way to create a far more sensitive electrometer.
It also seems the infinitesimal DC grid current leaps off the probe at 25 volts, far lower than all prior art shows possible.
One of the patents I cited as surpassing in this class was licensed to NASA, for lauch tower monitoring.
Two patent review objections and irrelevant prior art were overcome.
Either 6982549 or 7071674 into a google search brings it up. Both read the same, except in claims.
I would appreciate comments, conjecture, and challenge of my ideas, even though these were granted a while ago.