Most likely reason is a pending format change.
It looks like the current format didn't do as well long-term as they hoped three years ago. Their ratings are not spectacular and have been pretty much flat for two of those years, other than a slight bump in 12+ in last Spring's book which was largely within the margin of error and then disappeared the following book.
Let's face it: Hovering around a 1.0 share 12+ in a market where the top two stations are in the 6's and the #3 and #4 pulled up into the 5's last book isn't a success.
Where do you see a call letter change?What’s up with them changing there call letters to KWLL?
The last station to have the KWLL calls was in the Tyler/Longview market -- went by "the Well" with a religious format.
Where do you see a call letter change?
The FCC approved the application today: Draft Copy « Licensing and Management System « FCCWhere do you see a call letter change?
Only pointing to one possible branding for calls of KWLL.Which is totally irrelevant to this discussion. The two markets are about 300 miles apart.
Only pointing to one possible branding for calls of KWLL.
I wonder if that explains the reason my vehicle has been showing WLLZ meta data????
Maybe I am more of a realist, but I do not remember ever seeing unrelated stations pick up an old call sign and then duplicate the previous station's format and name, in a completely different market.
Yet, given the station's signal coverage issues, a non-commercial religious format may be its only means for survival...
And that is purely speculative, going on nothing more than a call letter change request.
But aren't they at or near max height for a Class A at 4.5kW?Correction to my last post:
That 4.5kW wouldn't be as bad if the transmitter wasn't essentially at ground level.
But aren't they at or near max height for a Class A at 4.5kW?