BillBattle said:
jmtillery said:
Tibbs2, thank you for the kind words and the compliment.
Although I don't know the exact details relating to 100.3, my best guess is Citadel may be using the 100.3 loss as a trade-off of some sort. In any high finance, or even in smaller situations, it isn't necessarily how many pluses and minuses you have on the Balance Sheet that determines success or failure, but rather how you play the pluses and the minuses. In other words, a minus isn't always a loss. Played correctly, a minus can actually be a plus.
Say what?
In accounting terms it is refered to as Debits and Credits. Using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) there are tradeoffs, mostly for tax purposes, but there can be other advantages. Any competent CPA will tell you the same thing.
Citadel is no slouch company when you consider all the facts. They may have lost the 100kw 100.3 in Knoxville, however, at the same time, Citadel also wiped out billions in debt while its executive team has maintained control of the company and kepted its prized ABC station portfolio. In Knoxville, Citadel is still a major player with its prized WIVK, even without 100.3.