They got competition (in August of 2009) that wasn't some little tiny station with little talent. Many people liked what 98.5 had to offer. Eventually they forced Ordway to retire and put Salk in as
Holley's new partner. (And even before then, in Sept. of '11, they were forced to simulcast on FM
and then move the AM to ESPN...again due to the competition).
Does EEI's demo skew older? Do younger and middle aged folks prefer Sports Hub? Did the lackluster Sox of a couple years back drag them down...did they overpay for Sox rights, and now with
a bad economy they have to scale back?
Decisions have had to be made either in Wolfe's office or corporate in Bala Cynwyd PA. They can still be competitive with 98.5 but they lose in many time slots in many important demos. Yes they have made changes but are the changes helping?
PM DRIVE: Feb, Salk unveiled
http://www.boston.com/sports/other-...replacement/W6EqFpcDIMPdDg72v0lMLJ/story.html
See articles in Boston Sports Media Watch, in the papers (Finn, etc.) about the ratings including
show vs show.
From last Dec.: Felger & Mazz #1 M 25-54; Ordway & Holley #5.
http://www.boston.com/sports/touching_all_the_bases/2012/12/sports_hub_no_1_in_fall_rating.html
In Jan Bruce of BSMW said the morning duo had to go.
http://www.bostonsportsmedia.com/2013/01/its-time-for-weei-to-say-goodbye-to-dennis-and-callahan
>>But now, they are eons behind Toucher and Rich in the latest ratings book, (T&R finished first at --, D&C sixth at --) and I cannot foresee a scenario in which they ever overtake T&R again.
(Allen figured it was best to put D&C on RKO mornings)
>>. As Finn notes, a shakeup is more likely to happen in the afternoon with Ordway
A month later...it did.