• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Political Correctness at Fox Goes On Trial

Fox talks right but acts PC. Fires news reader. They can say it; you can't. He sues Murdoch, Ailes and Company.


Ex-Fox29 anchor in court: My daughters will think I'm a racist

An all-white jury in Philadelphia is being asked to determine who can say the racial epithet known as "the n-word."

Along the way, they also will have to decide whether it’s acceptible to ever use it within the confines of a news-gathering operation.

On Monday, a racial discrimination suit filed by a former Fox29 anchorman opened in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia. ...

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/E...ll_think_Im_a_racist.html#4LOcPh1Rjx0DDHzb.99


Trial begins in TV anchor's N-word lawsuit

CAN A WHITE employee be fired for using the N-word, even if his black colleagues also say it?

Former Fox 29 anchor Tom Burlington's lawsuit against the station seeks to answer that question in a trial that began yesterday in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia.

Burlington was fired in July 2007 after he used the N-word during an editorial meeting in which reporters discussed the symbolic burial of the N-word by the Philadelphia Youth Council of the NAACP.

His suit claims that he was punished for his non-pejorative use of the word because he's white. ...

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/2...hor_s_N-word_lawsuit.html#trdqWUAHi5GsDGdO.99
 
This guy lost at trial. He also lost his job and probably his career.

Meanwhile, yesterday Obama used the same word to make a point in a speech and nobody seems to mind. Double standards abound in PC Land.
 
From the NewPittsburghCourierOnline.com:


The all-White jury, after about three hours of deliberations, found that race was neither the determining factor nor a motivating factor in his dismissal.

Fox lawyers had argued that Burlington continued “not to get it,” repeating the word in apologies to offended Black colleagues and in other follow-up conversations that ensued that week.

“Nobody wanted to fire this man,” lawyer Jerome Hoffman argued to the jury Monday. “They had a serious problem with an employee who didn’t get it, who wanted to press his point.”
 
The case was in Philadelphia, not Pittsburgh.

And the "New Pittsburgh Courier" is a Black weekly newspaper, owned by a chain of Black weeklies based in Detroit. Interesting choice of media, especially since a Google News search on this story puts this story way down the list.

According to testimony over the past two weeks, tension inside the station simmered after weekend co-anchor Joyce Evans, who is Black, heard about the weekend news meeting.

“Evans encouraged other co-workers to complain to management …, even urging a White co-worker to do so because ‘(t)he only people who have complained so far have been Black people,'” U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick wrote in a memo last year.

Oh, no. Race was not a factor. And since jury deliberations are private, how does this Pittsburgh paper know what this bunch of people too stupid to get out of jury duty thought?
 
Seems to be a local affiliate from the reading. America is pretty tired of the race hustling. We are a single multi-ethnic culture. The American citizenry is comprised of one people. One culture.
 
Last edited:
Interesting choice of media, especially since a Google News search on this story puts this story way down the list.

Maybe for you, but my Google search (keyword: Tom Burlington lawsuit) put it #2, right after Philly.com. To be honest, I had no idea who owned it when I posted the quote. Just thought it presented a contrasting opinion.

Are you disputing the reporting because of the source, or because you disagree with the viewpoint?
 
Are you disputing the reporting because of the source, or because you disagree with the viewpoint?

Historically, the Black media (like many other ethnic and group-identified media, and like Fox News) present themselves as advocates and proponents for the groups they target and claim to represent. They do not follow the rules of journalism preached (if not always practiced) by the MSM.

If not for the racial angle, this is a story that would have no interest in Pittsburgh. There's is absolutely no local angle or local tie-in. Except for activist blogs and Black publications, this story appears not to have been picked up at all by mainstream media outside Philly.

Yes, WTXF is owned by Fox - News Corp, and the stations' group, like Fox News, reports to Roger Ailes, who once worked for KYW-TV and served as executive producer of The Mike Douglas Show there. WTXF's former general manager now is manager of WXPN, a public radio AAA station, and a member of the NPR board (now seeking reelection).
 
Historically, the Black media (like many other ethnic and group-identified media, and like Fox News) present themselves as advocates and proponents for the groups they target and claim to represent. They do not follow the rules of journalism preached (if not always practiced) by the MSM.

I don't see much difference between the reporting in what I posted and the story in Philly.com. They both report the finding of the jury. That information didn't come from inside the jury room, but rather stated by the judge in the open courtroom. Maybe you can point out where they've diverged from the so-called "rules of journalism."
 
Seems to be a local affiliate from the reading. America is pretty tired of the race hustling. We are a single multi-ethnic culture. The American citizenry is comprised of one people. One culture.

Yes, that's our goal. And if we as a nation and an economy are going survive and thrive in the coming decades, we only slow things down much like the barnacles on a ship's hull if we try to keep the "race hustling" concept alive. So at the "organized society" level, we talk and act out the "one culture" goal.

But I take it maybe you don't live in and maybe don't spend a lot of time in "the old Deep South". I go to bed every night repeating your words to myself: "We are one people, we are one culture." By Noon the next day, but sometimes not until the 6 P.M. news on TV, I find myself muttering: "Oh crap! Not again! Race hustling still lives!"

Maybe tomorrow... or sometime next week... will be better.

Well, actually it is better. I left the South 54 years ago when one of my supervisors informed me that when reading the news, I MUST refer to the President of the state NAACP as "Daisy Bates"... and never, never ever as "Mrs. L. C. Bates". Since returning I have yet to have someone get in my face for giving a Black woman the dignity of calling her "Mrs." The forms and formats of "race hustling" are much more sophisticated these days.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom