• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Poll: Active versus Alternative in New York City

I've seen the arguement made that K-Rock is failing because its playlist and imaging are too unfocused. K-Rock plays a fair amount of alternative music, but has active rock, urban-decay imaging and is anchored around active rock fixture (with no ratings) O&A. A number of posters on this board suggest that K-Rock should go full time active. I think a full time active rock station would fail miserably in a market as educated as New York. Which begs the question:

What modern rock format would succeed more in New York, and why, Active or Alternative?
 
Like I said in another thread, I think an active/alternative hybrid could work - just not the way K-Rock is doing it. I'd suggest a station that's primarily active rock, but with some harder-edged alternative acts like thrown in, and without the Nickelback/Hinder/Daughtry trucker rock.

That said, I think a straight-up Alternative has potential too.
 
ACTIVE Full rock ;D

now that would be nice... its to bad its not 1995 or so anymore where we had a thing called competition of 5 different or so rock stations. 102.7 WNEW, Q 104.3, 95.9 WFOX norwalk Rock at the time, 107.1,
1055 WDHA, 89.5 WSOU ( I do get WDHA, WSOU here in greenwich over the 89.5 from Brideport and 105.5 in Patterson NY..)
I am sure I missed a (Few stations like WRKI, WBAB when people still listened to just radio in the NYC area before Ipods etc...)
feel free to add the ones I missed...
 
I guess their problem is that Opie and Anthony doesn't do anything for them in the morning and that they don't even have an afternoon drive time show or dj.
 
Maybe they should go for a AAA format (Adult Album Alternative). Those have very loyal audiences.

but has active rock, urban-decay imaging

What do you mean by "urban decay"? Honest question, not trying to start an argument. ???
 
hotpatrick2004 said:
Z-100 had a good pop/alternative sound in the mid nineties and i also remember mix 105.1 and big 105.1

All three of those cases were ratings failures and that particular "experiment" by Z-100 nearly caused the station to seriously consider trashing the Z-100 identity and starting from scratch. Fortunately, they were able to "right the ship" and bring it back to its CHR roots and senses.
 
StephanieNYC said:
Maybe they should go for a AAA format (Adult Album Alternative). Those have very loyal audiences.

but has active rock, urban-decay imaging

What do you mean by "urban decay"? Honest question, not trying to start an argument. ???

Urban decay, to me, means faded and dirty. If you look at their logo, its dirty or faded. It looks like some angry junior high student designed it. Instead of having circles in its letter and numbers, it has crosses. Their website is bordered by dismal gray. It's depressing. It looks like smog. That logo and bordering imaging alone is the decay, the urban comes from the background image of a blacked out midtown entrenched in fog. It looks bleak. That picture makes me think listening to this station will be akin to banging my head against a wall again and again and again. And then K-Rock had the audacity to stick a "listen now" button on the banner in red as if to confirm that listening is indeed painful.

I guess this imaging goes hand in hand with O&A. It's active rock imaging (and poor imaging at that). All O&A have ever been a part of, save their stint at WNEW, has been active rock. But those stations were fringe station on the outer suburbs of city where the dominant rocker was alternative. Their shear talent got those fringe stations ratings, and listeners from the urban center. But now, their built in listener base is on XM. WXRK decided to go with the active rock imaging to match their "flagship" morning show, and in the process scared off all those who might listen after the morning talk.

K-Rock's imaging is so 90's. It looks like something off a Korn album, its so dark. It reminds me of the cover of "Life is Peachy."

Its a shame too, because there is some really great alternative/new-wave coming out of Scotland and Texas right now. K-Rock is overlooking it to play emo and that stupid girl screamo song they play so much. I'm happy they've updated the playlist, but I don't think the consultants are doing a very good job working with A&R people to establish a sustainable pipeline of rock artists more interested in chasing women than whining about them or complaining about how messed up their parents are.

K-Rock needs to lighten up a bit. It needs to play some mello-er music, it needs to change it imaging to something that looked futuristic in the '70's. I think O&A are a huge mistake, but even they can be overcome. As it stands now, K-Rock is just too dark.
 
"All three of those cases were ratings failures and that particular "experiment" by Z-100 nearly caused the station to seriously consider trashing the Z-100 identity and starting from scratch. Fortunately, they were able to "right the ship" and bring it back to its CHR roots and senses."
[/quote]

Z-100 performed well in '93 and '94 when they experimented with a melodic Alt-Rock sound with bands like the Cranberries and Belly, but took a subsequent pounding when that sound evolved into a harder-edged one with bands like Bush and Metallica. I do agree though that they were smart to return to their CHR roots, despite the fact that pop music from late 1996 through 2000 was probably the worst in recorded history. ;D
 
KROQ - Want to get an audience, make money and keep the brand?

First of all, great job bringing K-Rock back. The smartest thing CBS Radio has done in the last three years is to look to the past, bring in/back Dan Mason and restore two powerful brands to the market.

However... and I will be as frank about this as possible, it's not 1995 anymore. The oversaturation of RHCP, Foo Fighters, Sound Garden, ect has to go. K-Rock sounds stale and is living in a time period that has since come and gone. It sounds like a watered down version of it's west coast counterpart. The last time I checked, this is not LA...

Alternative rock has become so fragmented over the last two decades along with it's devoted base of fans, especially in New York. For K-Rock to become viable, they really need to focus on what alternative has become, not what alternative was. Playing nu-metal and hard rock isn't going to go very far. That audience has, for the most part grown up. I know I am going to get torn a new one for saying this (and trust me, I am not a fan of this genre) but with all the energy surrounding new indie and jam bands in NYC and Brooklyn, this is the direction the station should go. How many venues in the LES / West Village feature indie and jam bands as opposed to metal groups? Sorry metal folks - it's over, at least the way that we remember it. Make a mixed format of today's "alternative" music that sits somewhere between the hipster "death cab" fanatic, the MMW / Flaming Lips groupie and the loud rock fan and you will have a wining "alternative" format. Tie that in with local promotion and massive representation at NYC area live shows and now you not only have a station, you have a community. Cross promote with some of the dozens of independent papers that are out on the street, reach out to the mid-level indie labels that represent artists that dominate indie web airplay and now you have an institution. It will be something completely different for sure but will definately work. Everyone on this board relentlessly quotes "ratings". This targets the very heart of the coveted demo and has enough flexibility that it can evolve and does not just capitalize on a current trend or "fad." Generate hybrid format that would have room for Morrisey AND Incubus AND Phish AND Guided by Voices and now you have the true I-POD format that not only appeals to your new urban listener but keeps the TSL up. Lets face it, lots of new faces around the city these days with no station to call home. Head in this direction and the numbers will improve. They have to.

Oh, and change the logo already.

Ok - start slugging. I'm ready.
 
Andrew sounds to me like what you are decribing is a marriage betwen triple a and alternative if you will. Not cororate rock not triple a but a hybrid. Love the idea. Kinda like my favorite station in the country www.indie1031.com in los angeles but a custom fit for new york!!! A station that can play the cure boys don't cry along side vampire weekend and orange peels and imogen heap. Please someone end this marraige between alt/active the 2 do not mix!!!

Hotpatrick out
 
Patrick -

You understand 100%. Thanks for the support!

AG
 
Re: KROQ - Want to get an audience, make money and keep the brand?

Andrew J. Gladding said:
First of all, great job bringing K-Rock back. The smartest thing CBS Radio has done in the last three years is to look to the past, bring in/back Dan Mason and restore two powerful brands to the market.

However... and I will be as frank about this as possible, it's not 1995 anymore. The oversaturation of RHCP, Foo Fighters, Sound Garden, ect has to go. K-Rock sounds stale and is living in a time period that has since come and gone. It sounds like a watered down version of it's west coast counterpart. The last time I checked, this is not LA...

Alternative rock has become so fragmented over the last two decades along with it's devoted base of fans, especially in New York. For K-Rock to become viable, they really need to focus on what alternative has become, not what alternative was. Playing nu-metal and hard rock isn't going to go very far. That audience has, for the most part grown up. I know I am going to get torn a new one for saying this (and trust me, I am not a fan of this genre) but with all the energy surrounding new indie and jam bands in NYC and Brooklyn, this is the direction the station should go. How many venues in the LES / West Village feature indie and jam bands as opposed to metal groups? Sorry metal folks - it's over, at least the way that we remember it. Make a mixed format of today's "alternative" music that sits somewhere between the hipster "death cab" fanatic, the MMW / Flaming Lips groupie and the loud rock fan and you will have a wining "alternative" format. Tie that in with local promotion and massive representation at NYC area live shows and now you not only have a station, you have a community. Cross promote with some of the dozens of independent papers that are out on the street, reach out to the mid-level indie labels that represent artists that dominate indie web airplay and now you have an institution. It will be something completely different for sure but will definately work. Everyone on this board relentlessly quotes "ratings". This targets the very heart of the coveted demo and has enough flexibility that it can evolve and does not just capitalize on a current trend or "fad." Generate hybrid format that would have room for Morrisey AND Incubus AND Phish AND Guided by Voices and now you have the true I-POD format that not only appeals to your new urban listener but keeps the TSL up. Lets face it, lots of new faces around the city these days with no station to call home. Head in this direction and the numbers will improve. They have to.

Oh, and change the logo already.

Ok - start slugging. I'm ready.

While I agree with you 97%, I'm going to scwabble about other 3%, because why else would I have write rights on this message board.

To me, jam bands are fun when you are all messed up, but, unless they are an electric blues jam band, listening to them sober is a chore.

I feel that, Foo Fighters, Green Day, Weezer, RHCP etc. are core alternative artists who helped restart the New-Wave/Alternative Movement, kept putting out currents, and their new releases deserve airplay if they are quality.

I hate everything Morrissey did "Heaven Knows I'm Miserable Now." He has no place on a modern radio.

I'd like to see that AAAlternative sation have a fair bit of New Wave Mixed into the normal playlist, song by artists like Elvis Costello, the Clash, U2, the cure, and REM. I'd also like for it to have a frequent (4 times a year) specialty weekends where I can hear the less New Wave bands.

As far as promotion, I think internet is the way to go. 65% of Gen-Y's will be listening via stream if the product is any good.

Also I hate death cab, Hot Hot Heat was a way better band in 2003.
 
What are the odds of the suits listening to us? k-rock rebrand it indie or the cutting edge of rock ninety two seven. The smiths are a bit dark.
at the very least though even if they do not go this route they should make k rock like kroq!!!
Even though i don't think the ratings on this triple a hybrid would be great i think sales could do well.
 
I would love to see a full blown alternative format on 92.3 like G-Rock (Jersey Shore) Indie (LA/OC) or XM's Ethel......I would also call it something other than K-Rock since the name has been through too many forms of rock.

its to bad its not 1995 or so anymore where we had a thing called competition of 5 different or so rock stations. 102.7 WNEW, Q 104.3, 95.9 WFOX norwalk Rock at the time, 107.1,
1055 WDHA, 89.5 WSOU ( I do get WDHA, WSOU here in greenwich over the 89.5 from Brideport and 105.5 in Patterson NY.. )
I am sure I missed a (Few stations like WRKI, WBAB when people still listened to just radio in the NYC area before Ipods etc...)
feel free to add the ones I missed...

In & around the city in 1995 we had:

89.5 WSOU "Pirate Radio" (Hard Rock)
92.3 WXRK "K-Rock" (Classic Rock)
92.7 WRRV "The Rock Revolution" (All Rock)
92.7 WDRE (Alternative/New Wave)
95.1 WRKI "I-95" (Rock)
95.9 WEFX "The Fox" (Rock)
100.3 WHTZ "Z-100" (Alternative Rock)
101.5 WPDH (Classic Rock)
102.3 WBAB (Rock)
102.7 WNEW "New York's Rock Alternative" (AAA)
104.3 WAXQ "Q-104.3" (Hard Rock)
105.5 WDHA "Rocks New Jersey" (Rock)
106.3 WHTG "FM-106.3; Modern Rock @ The Jersey Shore" (Alternative Rock)
107.1 WRGX "X-107; Today's Rock" (Alternative Rock)

Those stations today:

89.5 WSOU "Pirate Radio" (Hard Rock)
92.3 WXRK "K-Rock" (Active Rock)
92.7 WRRV "The New Music Alternative" (Alternative Rock)
92.7 WQBU "La Que Buena" (Regional Mexican)
95.1 WRKI "I-95" (Rock)
95.9 WFOX "The Fox" (Classic Rock)
100.3 WHTZ "Z-100" (CHR)
101.5 WPDH "The Home Of Rock & Roll" (Rock)
102.3 WBAB "Long Island's Home Of Rock & Roll" (Rock)
102.7 WWFS "Fresh 102.7" (AC)
104.3 WAXQ "Q-104.3" (Classic Rock)
105.5 WDHA "The Rock of New Jersey" (Rock)
106.3 WHTG "G-Rock" (Alternative)
107.1 WXPK "The Peak" (AAA)

Area stations that became Rock stations after 1995 and are still around:

95.9 WRAT "The Rat" (Rock)
103.7 WNNJ "The Tri-State's Classic Rock" (Classic Rock)

Area stations that tried Rock and failed between 1995 and now:

106.3 WZZN (Classic Rock)
106.3 WFAF (WPDH Simulcast)
*Yes both are the Mount Kisco 106.3*
 
I just hope since g rock on the jersey shore had a bad trend they do not tweak a thing. Finally after 7.2 yrs of press ownership they sound good!!!
 
A number of posters on this board suggest that K-Rock should go full time active. I think a full time active rock station would fail miserably in a market as educated as New York.

I completely disagree.

Active Rock does great in places such as Denver, Minneapolis, and Seattle.

It does fairly well in San Diego, Atlanta (where Project 9-6-1 is putting 99X out of business), and Boston. Hell, CBS was so concerned about WAAF that for a long time WBCN was a pseudo-Active Rock station, not a true Modern Rock station.

When the now defunct KSJO in San Jose / San Francisco was a full-fledged Active Rock station (i.e. before they lost a popular morning show & gravitated toward Mainstream Rock), it was often the top rated rock station in San Jose and barely trailed Live 105 in the composite San Francisco market numbers -- and this was when Live 105 had Stern! This is despite the fact KSJO had a terrible signal in much of the northern 1/3 of the market.

You act as if the target listeners would be residents of Manhattan & no one else.

Earlier posters were on target with their comments. K-Rock in its current form is a failure because the brand has no cohesion. I completely agree with the look of the web site -- it is PATHETIC. Looks like something you'd see in market #100. The morning show and music do not mesh well with each other. The whole product is poorly construed.

The CBS brain trust has not done a good job at executing modern, AAA, active, & mainstream rock stations in recent years.

Let's look at the track record:

--New York's K-Rock: persistent music tweaks, then a flip to talk, and then a flip back to rock with a half-assed presentation. The ratings are just as bad today as what WNEW had during its final couple years as a rock station.

--Pittsburgh's K-Rock: terrible ratings, even when Stern was still airing in mornings

--San Antonio's K-Rock: terrible ratings, with the exception of one book

--San Francisco's Live 105: did well for maybe 2 years after Stern moved over from KOME. Since then, the ratings have stunk.

--Las Vegas' X107-5: did well until the suits messed with the brand by changing the identifier to "X-treme ROCK Radio" yet add a LOT of non-music programming (such as O&A to middays). TERRIBLE move. They are still trying to recover. Damage was already done by the time Dan Mason came in.

--Portland's KUPD: ratings have been lackluster since Stern left.

--Cincy's Channel Z/ New Rock 97-3 / Everything Alternative 97-3: never did that well out of the gate, but the ratings became worse when CBS tried mixing Stern with gold-based adult friendly modern rock.

--Detroit's K-Rock / Xtreme Radio: this one died a long time ago. Xtreme Radio was a clone of Las Vegas' X107-5 and did somewhat better than its predecessor, K-Rock. The ratings still lagged behind WRIF by a mile, though, and revenue wise the results were even worse.

--Memphis' 93X: terrible ratings the entire time CBS owned it

--Boston's WBCN: even before WAAF began simulcasting on 97.7 in Brockton, they were frequently within shooting range of WBCN, and often beat them in certain demos / dayparts. Pretty pathetic when you consider WAAF's main transmitter is 40 miles outside of downtown Boston.

--Buffalos' WBUF: made minimal inroads on 97Rock and The Edge when it was a Mainstream Rock station

--Sacramento's KXOA / KHWD: terrible ratings each & every book. No threat whatsoever to 98Rock.

--Cleveland's K-Rock: one of a VERY few CBS rock launches over the last decade that has been mildly successful

--Washington's KTGB: ratings suck almost as bad as its predecessor, 94.7 WARW.

--Atlanta's 92-9 Dave FM: ratings are no better than when the station was classic rock Z93. They can take a little solace in the fact their ratings aren't as bad as 99X, though. They trail 97-1 The River by a mile.

--Philadelphia's WYSP: station with great ratings several years ago was trashed to make room for syndie talkers. Numbers sank, especially when the station was 100% talk from 6AM - 7PM. The station then cut back on talk and added more hours of music programming. Ratings rebounded. Revenue remained EXCELLENT.

Did they learn their lesson? Nope. Stern retires. Big wigs decide to blow up the entire station and go mostly talk. Now, instead of retooling one daypart, programmers were faced with the daunting task of retooling every major daypart. What a great maneuver! ::)

Revenue falls almost by half. Now the staton is back to all music again. Too bad its former listeners have by & large already found new homes (WMMR, WMGK, WRFF). Also, it's a shame the playlist of the reincarnated WYSP looks too much like a watered down version of WMMR.

Bottom line: CBS cannot do Rock to save its life. They need to bring some new lifeblood on board. Some people who are actually familiar with what works outside of Los Angeles.

Their track record in the format is absolutely abysmal, outside of the persistent ratings and revenue success of KROQ in Los Angeles.
 
Beastie Boys - Girls ---Shake Your Rump

commercials

RHCP - Hey Oooh

RHCP - Scar Tissue --- Breaking the Girl

Some band I don't know who Sounds like a poorer man's Puddle of Mudd - only more depressing, talks about suicide. If I weren't forcing myself to listen, I'd change the station. I honestly don't know what CBS is thinking playing this song unless they are contractually obliged to play this song. And if they are contractually obliged to play the song, then perhaps they should name the artist and song.
Smashing Pumpkins - Today -- This song would have fit better before the last song
Violent Femmes - Kiss Off --!!!!! ;D !!!!!! EXACTLY WHAT THEY SHOULD BE PLAYING

Audioslave - Be Yourself

Green Day - She ---Walking Contradiction
commercials

Foo Fighters - The Pretender

Nirvana - Rape Me ---Sliver (Or School, but I won't hold my Breath)

Staind - It's Been a While - Yawn....I don't really have a problem with Staind, I actually lived out in the Valley for four years, but Stained doesn't get me excited. I can hear it on my MP3 player. It'd behoove K-Rock to play something more exciting.

Alice in Chains - Dem Bones ---(Me doing my Best impression of Beavis and Butthed headbanging on their couch when a song really rocks) I love this song, I love Alice in Chains...my favorite Seattle band. That said, if this song were human, it'd be driving around Long Island somewhere. It belongs on classic rock. But, this song, like any "Lost Classic" has an excitement factor to it.

Sublime - What I Got --- April 29, 1992/Get Ready This song (What I Got) is the complete opposite of Dem bone, both stylistically and novelity-wise. it can't be a lost classic, becasue it never went away. This workhorse of alternative radio needs to be put out to pasture after twelve years.

White Stripes - Icky Thump ---Posters on this board say this song is overplayed, I've heard it max five times ever.

Offspring - Self Esteem --- Another Lost Classic (though all the single from Smash are lost classics)

O&A spot - "we have no guests"
Commercials

Linkin Park - Shadow of the Day -- Sometimes I think Linkin Park could be the Hall and Oates of my Generation...they could't make more radio friendly music

Beastie Boys - Fight for Your Right --- Sure Shot/Body Movin....The Beastie Boys are probably one of my top 3 favorite bands, but I only really liked License to Ill when I was in 7th grade and didn't know about their other albums.

K-Rock spot shouting out Long Island, a few trendy neighborhoods in Brooklyn, and Union City....so out of touch (where is Queens).

Live - All over You --- Hey, it must be 1994...White,Discussion is the best single on that album

Nine Inch Nails - The Hand That Feeds ---(Clueless (1995): Travis Birkenstock says, "so how I feel about The Rolling Stones, is how my kids are going to feel about Nine Inch Nails.")

STP - Creep
 
MarkW said:
Bottom line: CBS cannot do Rock to save its life. They need to bring some new lifeblood on board. Some people who are actually familiar with what works outside of Los Angeles.

Their track record in the format is absolutely abysmal, outside of the persistent ratings and revenue success of KROQ in Los Angeles.

I'd be happy to help. My base is 150k/y and I expect bonus to be indexed to revenue growth.

But, more realistically, why not hire the PD from WFNX in Boston. They always seem to get it right.
 
I would say that AAA would be the best choice for a rock format in the city. New York just isn't really a "rock" town. I just don't see active rock or alternative as being very viable. I do, however, think there is room for a well produced AAA station that is more mainstream and commercial than WFUV. (How about something like "92-3 the City", World Class Rock?) . Anyone else think AAA could work in NYC? Of course, O&A would have to go.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom