Taking a poll here on Rock imaging
Favorite Voice:
Favorite FX package:
Favorite Station Overall:
Chime in now!~
Favorite Voice:
Favorite FX package:
Favorite Station Overall:
Chime in now!~
Emmett said:I actually prefer the 'less is more' approach. I hate creative sweepers. Promos are different and should be creative. But I can't stand it when sweepers are cluttered with anything more than business.
surfdude said:Most radio "Imaging" is annoying - much like the promo crawls on network TV.
Get that off the screen!
The last three songs you played should BE your image. You don't have to tell them you play the Best Rock or the Greatest Hits of the 70s and 80s.
The right music, tell 'em the dial postition, and topical/local DJ content. Done.
No song montages, no "the station everyone can agree on at work" BS.
Jack-FM gets it right. They're imaging serves as the topical/local irreverent "personality". Their stuff is
short, funny, and topical. Listen to KCBS-FM in LA for thirty minutes.
Jingles on pop stations work nicely for dial position. People begin to sing along with them if they're good.
Favorite voices...
Howard Cogan
John O'Hurley
Barry Corbin
Real voice actors. Most standard radio imaging VOs could not pull off what these guys can do.
Favorite efx package...none.
Now that stations don't have a lot of good live DJs anymore, the Imaging may become more important and offer more work for freelancers. But, you have to develop a real personality for your imaging VO like "Jack".
It's not about the "growl" or the "efx", it's about the writing and acting.
I can't say that I disagree with you here. I think many times the Production guy is also the imaging guy, so they don't have the time, creativity or even the skills to put together a tight package.surfdude said:Most radio "Imaging" is annoying - much like the promo crawls on network TV.
Get that off the screen!
This is debatable. People listen to your station to feel connected to the music, and imaging should reinforce that connection. People don't want to hear you're the "Best" or "Greatest", but telling them that along with the dial position and call letters isn't imaging, it's your positioning statement. Big difference. Song montages reinforce the musical connecton your listeners will experience if/when they tune in to your station.Your right about the work thing, that's just weak and lazy.surfdude said:The last three songs you played should BE your image. You don't have to tell them you play the Best Rock or the Greatest Hits of the 70s and 80s.
The right music, tell 'em the dial postition, and topical/local DJ content. Done.
No song montages, no "the station everyone can agree on at work" BS.
This one baffles me!?! The statement about the DJ's is very broad. I know of many stations with lots of really good jocks. I also know of some stations with less that serviceable talent. About the imaging, freelancers? Imaging is a key component of the success of a radio station, so it is always important whether the dj's are good or not. Is your point that some freelancers "get it" more than some staffers that don't have the time to create the good stuff? Not sure I follow your logic on the freelance thing.surfdude said:Now that stations don't have a lot of good live DJs anymore, the Imaging may become more important and offer more work for freelancers.
Noted, but I think it depends on when you "came up" in the business and who you learned/mentored from. Not taking a shot Emmett, I sincerely mean it. It depends on who you learned from, what decade, what part of the country, and other influences. Most of today's Execs all came up in the 80s - when liners in less than 10sec was the rage. Look what's going on today. Sound familiar?
Image99Seven said:Favorite Voice(s): Jeff Berlin/David Kaye
FX: Frostbytes/Digital Juice
Favorite Station: More than favorite stations, I have favorite imaging guys. Joel Moss and Dave Foxx are the two biggies.