• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Pondering.....

From Northwest engineering maestro, Clay Frienwald:

http://www.broadcast.net/~sbe16/wg/2005/wg0805.htm#clay

"The big question is – Can we believe it this time? From the way it looks….2009 could be the end of Analog TV. This is going to come as a shock to a great number of set owners who, regardless of how many times you tell them, will ignore the info. There are those that are calling for the Government to pick up the tab for D to A converters for those that don’t upgrade their trusty old Sylvania. Already the Public Safety folks are chomping at the bit to get the 700mhz spectrum for their uses and Congress, who is involved in all of this, sees nothing but dollar signs in the hope that an auction for the analog spectrum will bring big-bucks. TV stations are in the process of choosing which channels they want to keep and give up; this process alone will further confuse the TV set owner!. Then there is radio that is eyeing spectrum that would permit a new all-digital band to replace the present AM. The next few years are going to be rather exciting to witness...."

Don't believe it.

Analog sets will be around for at least another 10-20 years. As long as manufacturers keep making them and Wal-Mart keeps selling them, the conversion is going to be SLOW. The Digital-Analog converters will help, but how is the government going to pay for them when so much money is dumped into the Iraq occupation? (And the wealthy should pay as few taxes as possible according to this administration's twisted ideology. The privledged should always have their rewards, don'tcha know...) It's also hard for the average person to bother when analog sets are still in such wide use.

However, freeing up the AM band for another digital medium should (ideally) bring more independent small local broadcasters on the airwaves-even if it is trusty old analog AM. But as Clay said, it's $$$ as always with Congress, so don't hold your breath....
<P ID="signature">______________
Seattle Hempfest, August 20-21, Myrtle Edwards Park, http://www.hempfest.org/

[email protected]


</P>
 
Re: end of Analog TV

I know several people that have no interest in digital TV, and have said they will just stop watching TV alltogether when "the switch" happens.

Originally, they said 2006 was going to be the cutoff. Now, it seems to be 2009. Would anyone be surprised if in 2008 they push it off again to 2012? Or, will they try to force everyone to turn in their TVs?

IMO, I think theres a reason that CDs overtook the LP and cassette, and DVDs overtook VHS (which overtook Beta), and Laserdiscs - it truly was better technology.

Try to explain to John Q. Consumer that digital radio and TV will require him to purchase new radios and TVs, or converters for those, just to receive the same programming they already receive from broadcasters under current conditions, and they'll just say "well, forget it then."

You can't have ratings without the public having the means to tune you in. Even if a station gets very high ratings, what if that only represents a very small non-diverse segment of the population, which is probably not the population advertisers want to reach?<P ID="signature">______________
<a target="_blank" href=http://www.radio-info.com/mods/board?Post=492543&Board=askus>RIP Doug Fleming</a></P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom