• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Possible new home for "Roseanne"?

Relented? They wanted to recoup some of the money they had sunk into the program anyway. That's not relenting, it's working through the process to arrive at an agreement.

Reportedly set to air at the time time, though a date has not been announced.
 
I Heard there is a strong possibility the Roseanne cast will go on without her and they can call it "The Conners", like in the 80s Valerie Harper didn't want to continue her show "Valerie", and NBC added Sandy Duncan and called it "The Hogans Family".

Yep I had the RIGHT title all a long, Not Darlene, LMFAO
 
I predict the show will be D.O.A. and only 3 of the 10 episodes will actually air. Besides with so many people boycotting ABC because of the cancellation of The Chew expect ratings to drop across the board.

The Chew? Whatever the fate of The Connors, The Chew will have no bearing on it. ABC didn't exactly go belly up when All my Children went away.

I don't think anyone at ABC--standard-issue public pronouncements aside--is likely under any illusions. Those who support Roseanne won't tune in. But the fact is ABC was on the hook for some sizable cash. This way they can recoup some of it (and one way or another, the 10 episodes will run) and cut their losses in the worse-case scenario.
 
Network boycotts don't work no matter how many soap fans said years ago they were boycotting ABC how that work out ABC will be fine and make some $$$ from The Connors even if it doesn't do well because Roseanne isn't on it wonder what they will say Roseanne died or something.
 
I'm pretty sure ABC owns the "Roseanne" name, so any new home would have to come with the blessing of the Mickey Mouse company. Seems unlikely.
And with the recent firestorm Rosanne Barr created for herself, I seriously doubt News Corp wants the baggage on ANY of its entertainment networks

Pat
 
Network boycotts don't work no matter how many soap fans said years ago they were boycotting ABC how that work out ABC will be fine and make some $$$ from The Connors even if it doesn't do well because Roseanne isn't on it wonder what they will say Roseanne died or something.
Punctuation can help make points more understandable.
 
The Chew? Whatever the fate of The Connors, The Chew will have no bearing on it. ABC didn't exactly go belly up when All my Children went away.

I don't think anyone at ABC--standard-issue public pronouncements aside--is likely under any illusions. Those who support Roseanne won't tune in. But the fact is ABC was on the hook for some sizable cash. This way they can recoup some of it (and one way or another, the 10 episodes will run) and cut their losses in the worse-case scenario.

The Libtard network, ABC should cancel The View and Jimmy Kimmel
 
I was not a strong Roseanne supporter, and I did like the character--eventually--but I will watch.

Now the "Kevin Can Wait" situation was very different. They took a female lead I really liked and replaced her with a female lead I can't stand. And all of a sudden all these characters I thought I liked weren't as entertaining as I once thought. The fired actress showed up in a guest role on another show. I didn't know her but immediately liked her and liked her through the entire episode. And it was Erinn Hayes. Now Kevin can wait. I waited too long and when my TiVo got full …

I didn't notice that the change hurt the ratings, but the show is gone.
 
Another thing about ABC, Last Man Standing had much higher ratings than "Fresh Off The Boat" and which one was cancelled, STUPID.
 
https://deadline.com/2018/06/the-conners-emmy-roseanne-sharknado-carol-burnett-1202416116/

Interesting take though
Initially I had been predicting a few Emmy nominations for the enormously popular reboot of Roseanne, especially for the well-liked and frequently nominated John Goodman and three-time Roseanne Emmy winner Laurie Metcalf, but after the star’s Twitter meltdown and abrupt cancellation of the series by ABC, I deep-sixed those thoughts, with the idea that no one is going to want to touch that show with their vote in these circumstances. But with ABC’s widely publicized announcement that the show will go on after all, now known as The Conners and starring everyone except Roseanne Barr herself, I now am hedging those bets. ABC’s release came with four full days of voting still to go, and that is an eternity in a competition where more than enough members are waiting until the final hours to finally turn in their ballot. Could the fact that Goodman and Metcalf are coming back in September give their own Emmy chances this season a boost? I won’t place money on it, but I think there is still enough time for a possible turnaround in their case.
Television Academy

As for the idea of going ahead with the series without its namesake star, it will be interesting to see what the writers and producers come up with. All along in this process I thought calling it The Conners was the way to go. Earlier rumors it was going to be built around, and named, after Sara Gilbert’s Darlene character made me cringe. This is a comedy and Darlene was probably the least funny character in the cast, at least the way it has been written so far (with no offense to Gilbert, who is fine in the role and was the actual mover and shaker in getting the series revived in the first place). There is plenty of precedent here, particularly in the case of the NBC sitcom Valerie starring Valerie Harper, which had to be renamed The Hogan Family after Harper, like Roseanne, got fired from her own series after its first season in 1986. The series went on to have a healthy life with remaining cast members like Jason Bateman and with the prime addition of Sandy Duncan to take up the slack from Harper’s abrupt exit. It ran for 110 episodes, and Bateman told me recently that before Arrested Development came along it was his favorite TV experience, and he only had kind words for both co-stars Duncan and Harper.

If you ask me the newly named The Conners should follow that example and consider bringing in a new star, a funny new star, to replace the hole left by Barr’s exit. In fact they wouldn’t have to look much farther than the writing staff and a stand-up comedy star by the name of Wanda Sykes. Just sayin’.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom