The PPM is not that sensitive. The concern by radio folks is that it may not hear everything due to clothing, being in a purse, etc. There is no concern that it will hear "too much".David, I saw you said on another thread that the PPM measures what it hears.
How is this not misleading?
I could have a radio on in the car so low that the PPM could hear it and humans might not.
Advertisers want to know if their ads are "heard". That includes incidental listening.I'd think with writing it down that you actually have to pay more attention to who or what you're listening too.
The delay is having others pay for it. The fact is that advertisers "run the show" and they use ratings to determine pricing for radio and radio related streams. The music business does not subscribe to Nielsen and has no interest in radio ratings in that sense.Measuring all audio would be good, as Tidal, Apple Music, all these other things are a thing now.
Personally, I don't think measuring AM/FM/HD/Translator and satellite is enough.
Because we have all of these other ways to listen to music.
The purpose of the PPM or any radio ratings is to set prices and determine choices for radio ad campaigns. That's the total purpose. Radio stations pay for the ratings so agencies can have them for nearly no cost.I'd think the only way to get even more accurit measurement is to measure it all.
I'm sure even us radio people don't just listen to traditional AM/FM media.
John
Measuring "it all" is the equivalent of the Census. The cost would be astronomical, as it would have to be done again each week for about $1 to $2 billion dollars per weekly survey. That would be, annually, about six to seven times the total income of the radio industry!
Advertisers are satisfied with the current survey participant numbers. There is absolutely no reason to increase them. The current accuracy level is acceptable to the survey users.