• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

PPMs delayed in major markets

InTIMadate said:
Told you the PPM was junk research. The trades today are full of stories about how Arbitron is on the ropes for selling radio their smoke and mirrors. Beware the board posters here that are in Arbitron's pocket. They will fill your head and mouth with false tales and false facts about PPM. This is not about how "radio should be supporting PPM." It's how Arbitron should come clean and improve their sample before selling it at a premium as fact.

There are no mirrors and no smoke. Arbitron simply could not get the sample proportional and the cells at the right level. Nobody has done a panel synidcated radio survey before, and the problems of panel recruitment and maintenance have been shown to Arbitron's dismay.

The industry is working to make sure that the sample is correct in size and proportional in every cell on the stratification variables. Most of us think this will happen, and everyone will be satisfied if not happy with the results.

I welcome the coming congressional investigation where Arbitron will have to expose their dealing with the Media Rating Council.

There is no congressional investigation. NABOB suggested one might be appropriate, as some broadcasters did with the Nielsen LPM, as you state. But, so far, no hearing or action has been scheduled. If the system is correct and transparent (the job of the MRC) then there will be no issues.

There’s something wrong with their methodology.

There is nothing wrong with the methodology, there is a problem with achieving a full and proporitonal panel.
 
InTIMadate said:
I welcome the coming congressional investigation where Arbitron will have to expose their dealing with the Media Rating Council. There’s something wrong with their methodology. There’s precedent for such a request. Congress quizzed Nielsen about its Local People Meter. It's time to expose their dark secrets to the bright light and find out how ugly this baby really is...

The aforementioned Media Rating Council has abruptly discontinued Arbitron for five markets, including Tampa and Cleveland. They still maintain Arbitron in nine markets, including Atlanta. Whatever happens next, might actually affect Q100, to dig up an old board meme.
http://www.radioink.com/Article.asp?id=2385550&spid=24698
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom