• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Pre processing in digital on air

P

poweruzzo

Hello ...

I wanted to ask for your experience on processor Orban 8400/8500 digital line

Your use a preprocessor (es... Ariane Sequel / Level Magic junger) ?

Sorry for my English, i am Italian. Thanks

ciao;)

Edoardo Maruca
 
I love the Ariane. It makes garbage sound tolerable and good stuff shine.

Level Magic is OK... but you can hear it squeeze at times.
 
I've used the Arianne with a variety of processors, except the latest Orbans. I haven't used anything of theirs since the 8200.

I've used an Arianne with the 8100 and achieved much better results than with an XT chassis...both had the card 5 inserted. I can compete with today's boxes using that combo.

The analog Arianne is the very best of it's kind...I haven't used their digital sequel...but I can imagine. Arianne provides spectral balance control and allows a final limiter to really stay within a sweet spot. They're uncanny. I never got an Omnia6 to sound the way I wanted with an Arianne...but with the newer software and presets, I'm proud to run Omnia6Exi's barefoot.

The main reason why I would use an Arianne today is for one thing: protection of a digital discrete STL feed from the studio. When we go HD and digital, we'll likely order 2 analog Arianne's, btw.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom