oldies76 said:
Scooty430 It's ironic that you're asking for a weekend where EVERY song is part of the theme.....on the very weekend when they ARE playing ONLY #1 songs. Yup, even "Billy Don't Be A Hero."
CBS-FM deserves kudos for....
- keeping at least a little pre-64 on the air during "normal" hours
- doing the Radio Greats and Top 20 (and putting them online too.)
- playing a pretty wide variety of songs (considering what the radio mentality is these days)
Consider yourself lucky: Out here in LA, K-Earth's weekends are things like: "Parade of Hits Weekend." To this day I don't know what that means.
What is a "Parade of Hits Weekend"? Just the same ole overplayed 500 songs..right? CBS does the above mentioned..you are right. Even their 70's Saturday Night were all number ones...Heard some incredible "obscurities"....like the "Morning After" by M. McGovern, "Go Away Little Girl" by Mr. Osmond himself and "Annie's Song" by John Denver...slow songs for sure, but they're #1's...Why Not??
Why not? Well, because in 2008, songs like that drive away the CORE audience in droves.
I'm certainly not COMPLAINING about it, just trying to explain WHY it's not usually done.
As David Eduardo pointed out before, many of the "obscure" stuff the station plays are in (for lack of a better term)
throwaway dayparts that don't have much audience listening to begin with.
You want to appeal to your demo, "Little Brown Jug" by Glenn Miller was also a #1 song, but I think if CBS FM played it, even the "upper" upper end of the demo would go "whats this" and tune away.
Does chart position even matter? Chew on this..... "The Morning After" was a #1 song, "All My Loving" never charted, which is the more appealing song to listeners?
I understand your passion for these obscurities and loving the idea that they "try something different",
but lets say all of a sudden Coca-Cola had a chocolatey taste for the month of June..."just to try something different"
do you suppose that would be a good or bad move for its consumer base? Might not it be wiser for them to, as you say,
stick with the "same old redundacy".