• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

PROBLEMS AT KLVI ??

My auto-record software failed when it went to record the Ira Wilsker Show from the KLVI radio stream. I went to listen to it on the radio and noticed that KLVI is off. They are transmitting a dead carrier. Sounds serious.

Old Chicago
 
OldChicago said:
My auto-record software failed when it went to record the Ira Wilsker Show from the KLVI radio stream. I went to listen to it on the radio and noticed that KLVI is off. They are transmitting a dead carrier. Sounds serious.

Old Chicago
They have seemed very weak ever since I moved here. KTSA is as strong as KLVI in Cypress so you know something is wrong at KLVI. And KLIF IBOC sidebands are encroaching on KLVI big time.
 
My guess is the thunderstorms that we had here this afternoon between 6 and 7 hit them for awhile as their studio is in Beaumont and the towers at Bridge City. I could see how they had a carrier only as Beaumont is where the major storms were at that time.

Of course, it would help if Beaumont had some engineering support from CC, but that's another matter entirely.
 
stan said:
Of course, it would help if Beaumont had some engineering support from CC, but that's another matter entirely.

Engineering support? A totally unnecessary expense!
 
They're back now ... just turned on the radio in League City and KLVI was there, strong as ever.
I don't hear much KLIF interference on KLVI where I am, but Bruce you're also 40-50 miles closer to Dallas than I am with better radios. I do know KLVI's sidebands aren't particularly strong in Houston, for what it's worth.
 
radiobop said:
Engineering support? A totally unnecessary expense!

This must be Slogan Hogan's latest slogan.

It's also rumored that, to help with the engineering shortages, Hogan
will be training Ryan Watercress to take meter readings by remote
dial-in at every station he's VTed on. ;)
 
OldChicago said:
My auto-record software failed when it went to record the Ira Wilsker Show from the KLVI radio stream. I went to listen to it on the radio and noticed that KLVI is off. They are transmitting a dead carrier. Sounds serious.

Old Chicago


I found out that it was a direct lightning strike that took all of the stations run out of that complex off of the air. Computers and monitors were burned up. No one was hurt. This brings to mind a question. What ever happened to "fail safe". When I first got into this business stations were set up so if they lost contact with their transmitters, it would shut down after about 3 min if the communications link could
not be restored. KLVI in this case had a "runaway transmitter" for several hours.
Not good.


OLD CHICAGO
 
FCC Part 73 rules require a station to terminate after 3 hours of being non compliant...
but KLVI had dumped its engineer a while back from what I heard. Thus noone probably knew HOW to turn it off.
 
Actually, you can transmit silence if you want to. But, you absolutely have to have positive control of the transmitter. Meaning that you should have the capability to turn the transmitter off within three hours of loss of remote control, or within three hours of being notified of a problem such as over-power or off-frequency operation. If they lost their STL, they probably lost their remote control, too. Without the remote control; they had no way of knowing what the transmitter might be doing. Thus, by regulation, they no longer had positive control. So, not having an engineer or somebody who could go to the site and shut the transmitter within the required time limit, the fail-safe should have taken over and shut the transmitter down, automatically. Otherwise, they were in violation of the FCC regs.

In this case, they probably didn't even have anyone remotely resembling an engineer who could go to the transmitter and make sure things were under control, there. Most stations try to run with just a contract engineer, who could be hours away when you need them the most. If they had anyone, at all, they probably had them working on getting the studio back up and running, so they could continue making money. Most managers don't even think about the transmitter, until it goes off the air for lack of attention.

The satirical comment about the engineer being totally unnecessary is, unfortunately, true. Most companies see the engineer's paltry salary as an drain on the bottom line, rather than cheap insurance that can keep them out of trouble with the feds. And, the feds are too strapped with other bureaucratic crap to do anything about companies that try to live on the edge, without one. Only when they have to pay a hefty fine for improper operation does the engineer's salary begin to look like a small price to pay for such insurance.

IMHO, they should be totally embarassed that things went on as long as they did. Maybe they'll read this post, it'll have the desired effect and they'll hire one of those good engineers who have been on the street for far too long.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom