• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Production/Creative Services Directors

M

motrin

Guest
Would you agree that computer programs like "cool edit" and "saw" plus, network services like "audio clip art" make radio station imaging "a breeze". It's like a monkey could do imaging these days.

Kudos to the propeller heads who wrote those progams!
 
It beats the heck out of a razor blade and tape, lemmtellya!

The programs make intricate bits a LOT easier. Some effects weren't possible before those programs.

But the imaging that is a "breeze", is mediocre at best....Only about 5% of the creativity of the program and the producers true ability. That's where you lose out.


> Would you agree that computer programs like "cool edit" and
> "saw" plus, network services like "audio clip art" make
> radio station imaging "a breeze". It's like a monkey could
> do imaging these days.
>
> Kudos to the propeller heads who wrote those progams!
>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom