recto101 said:
Look at KCBS 740/106.9 why do you think they always cross promote on KPIX 5 and KBCW 44 or KQED 88.5 FM always cross promote on Channel 9 in SFO its because they want to hang on the top 3 ratings spots in SFO. They know that KGO-AM does have the potential to unseat them from the top 3 ratings spots.
That's laughable. KGO now poses little threat to either KCBS or KQED, especially after Cumulus fired several long-standing KGO talk hosts because of $$$$$ issues. That destroyed audience goodwill like none other. A pseudo-all-news KGO, like all other Cumulus stations, will be run on the cheap. And KCBS listeners will notice the obvious difference.
The real primary reason for KCBS A/F cross-promoting on KPIX/KBCW is because they are sister stations.
It's called corporate synergy. Same with KQED FM and TV.
recto101 said:
I say WCBS and WINS should not dismiss WEMP. CBS should wait until one of their FM properties flop.
I thoroughly disagree.
None of CBS' FM stations are close to "flopping," and WCBS and WINS play off of both
STRONG brand equity and deep heritage. If anything, CBS2 and WLNY will probably go into overdrive with cross-promotion (Why not do a video simulcast of WCBS or WINS in morning drive on WLNY?) that will squash WEMP before they have a chance to matter.
WEMP has
NO TV alliance of any sort, a secondary ABC affiliation (ABC-E?), and minimal external marketing (is there ANYTHING beyond the handful of TV ads?). Plus they will be saddled with the perception of still being a "chocolate chick so-called-news" station (DToTheJ proves that

) which will linger for a LONG time, presuming that Merlin doesn't go belly-up first.
Honestly, WEMP won't pose a threat for years to come if it remains as an all-newser. It would have been the case if the conditions for their debut were optimal, but Merlin threw the station into an inescapable quagmire right off the bat with their horrid initial programming moves.
Suggesting that CBS do something that do
NOT need to do and is totally unnecessary is getting really irritating.