• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Question time

autopaint-1 says:

They are upper management and they are senior engineers. They are members of SBE 15 as well. I've asked them about the competing systems and they shake their heads and say they don't come close technically, although they have looked at them, both what they say they can do and what they actually do and they feel IBOC is far superior.

But are these the people who actually implement HD? You know, the engineers "in the trenches"?

Cal
 
So who would you have me talk with Leonard Khan? These people have knowledge about all the digital system and many years of experience
 
Cal Stymes said:
But are these the people who actually implement HD? You know, the engineers "in the trenches"?

In some cases, yes. However, HD is both an industry wide strategy as well as a technical issue. This is no different than a multi-station company deciding to buy Nautel transmitters so they can get a discount. Individual engineers may prefer other brands, but corporate made a decision based on suitability and cost.
 
Speaking of Nautel, Harris and others. Do you have a preference for an AM facility David? Friends of mine like Nautel but I have always had a preference for the DX 50. I know there are a large number of Nuatel 50 Kw transmitters in the NY market. Since Continental got out they seem to be the big two. Oh here's Nautels HD fact sheets. They're PDF so I'll just post links here;

http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/7_FCC_AM_Specs.pdf

http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/8_FCC_FM_Specs.pdf


http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/6_FCC_Report_and_Order.pdf

http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/compliance.PDF

http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/2_KUVO_ turns_ on_ IBOC_colorado.pdf

http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/1_Improved_spectral_compliance_HDR.pdf

http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/4_Enhancing_Digital_Path_DMPX.pdf

http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Whitepapers/5_General Perf_AMPDM_IBOC.pdf
================================================================================

IBOC video link
http://www.nautel.com/Resources/Docs/Videos/nautel_dap.mov

See, I can post links too. :)
 
Why? did you read the links? They are from manufacturers of IBOC transmitters not wireless devices, You guys want facts? Here you go. What's with the name calling and insults. You don't like what I said? Did I mention you? Maybe it's time to look in a mirror.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom