• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Question

M

MrJimbo

Guest
Bloomington, IN has almost 70K in population. Why aren't they a "Rated Market"?
 
The simple answer: None of the owners want to buy the book. If that's the case then Arbitron won't measure listening in the market.

> Bloomington, IN has almost 70K in population. Why aren't
> they a "Rated Market"?
>
 
Springfield, Illinois, with a population of over 100,000 is not a rated market either for the same reason. A few years ago all the stations there agreed to no longer subscribe to Arbitron. And they're doing just fine.

> The simple answer: None of the owners want to buy the book.
> If that's the case then Arbitron won't measure listening in
> the market.
>
> > Bloomington, IN has almost 70K in population. Why aren't
> > they a "Rated Market"?
 
The same thing happened in Danville, Illinois. And the opposite happened in the new Marion-Muncie market.
 
> The simple answer: None of the owners want to buy the book.
> If that's the case then Arbitron won't measure listening in
> the market.
>
> > Bloomington, IN has almost 70K in population. Why aren't
> > they a "Rated Market"?
> >
>

So what's the measuring stick for advertising rates then? Or isn't there one?
 
> > The simple answer: None of the owners want to buy the
> book.
> > If that's the case then Arbitron won't measure listening
> in
> > the market.
> >
> > > Bloomington, IN has almost 70K in population. Why
> aren't
> > > they a "Rated Market"?
> > >
> >
>
> So what's the measuring stick for advertising rates then? Or
> isn't there one?
>
Interesting...the measuring stick is; whomever brings an affordable idea that actually provides the desired results for the advertiser. A somewhat, to totally, foreign concept in larger rated markets.<P ID="signature">______________
I get paid to be suspicious when I've got nothing to be suspicious about.</P>
 
> The same thing happened in Danville, Illinois. And the
> opposite happened in the new Marion-Muncie market.
>
No Arbs,,,, Probably why so little Format Changes and tweaks... Probably why WBWB in Bloomington is a pretty boring Top 40 station, that sounds just like it did 15 years ago.
 
> > > The simple answer: None of the owners want to buy the
> > book.
> > > If that's the case then Arbitron won't measure
> listening
> > in
> > > the market.
> > >
> > > > Bloomington, IN has almost 70K in population. Why
> > aren't
> > > > they a "Rated Market"?
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > So what's the measuring stick for advertising rates then?
> Or
> > isn't there one?
> >
> Interesting...the measuring stick is; whomever brings an
> affordable idea that actually provides the desired results
> for the advertiser. A somewhat, to totally, foreign concept
> in larger rated markets.
>

They do use TAPSCAN Custom (county) Coverage if the need ever arises, which it seldom does. Joke of a program by the way. Probably why you don't hear any national spots in BLM either.

The sample sizes are so small that you see wild fluctuations in the numbers from book to book.
 
Actually, having AMP own the station is the MAJOR reason, one might presume.

--Dylan


> > The same thing happened in Danville, Illinois. And the
> > opposite happened in the new Marion-Muncie market.
> >
> No Arbs,,,, Probably why so little Format Changes and
> tweaks... Probably why WBWB in Bloomington is a pretty
> boring Top 40 station, that sounds just like it did 15 years
> ago.
>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom