• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Quick Hitz, redefining CHR? or butchering music?

As I was looking at charts on All Access last month I noticed an ad for http://quickhitz.com/ and a statement that they play 24 songs an hour, every hour, I was curious and a bit fearful of what I figured for being a bunch of time compressed songs, REALLY squished down to almost nothing. It wasn't quite that (though some songs do seem a bit faster paced) it was chopping and pasting until a song is less than 3 minutes (at least the commercial breaks were less than 3 minutes as well).

I found it interesting that someone would put a patent on a method many DJ's for years have used to make scoped demos! I myself have edited some songs to adjust the length to suit my program purposes. Does this mean something I was doing as far back as 1979 will now get me into trouble for patent infringement? ;)

Anyhow, I told some non radio (er, I mean normal) people about it and they were horrified by the idea of cutting down the songs, in fact most would like it if the songs were at least 4 minutes in length. Has any radio station actually considered jumping on the bandwagon?
 
So doing the math, 24 songs per hour with 3 minutes of commercials is 24 songs in 57 minutes, which is between 2 and 3 minutes per song, meaning CHR listeners would only get to hear 2/3 of their favorite song, instead of the whole thing - in addition, stations would go bankrupt from only having 3 minutes of commercials per hour

The only time I could see this being a positive idea is on weekend nights when listeners are physically dancing to the music and rushing through songs would mean more energy/excitement

I still don't even see a correlation between pitching music and higher ratings - in Atlanta, Star and Power pitch, while Q100 and B98.5 don't, and the two that don't pitch are winning - same is true in Charlotte, Raleigh, and even New York City (pitching stations are losing) - IMO there's no reason why rushing through music even more quickly would cause people to want to listen longer
 
And that's why I'm baffled as to why they are doing this, I just can't see it be a winning format, it's almost like an April Fool's joke or a station stunting between formats (Quick 96 comes to mind).

Yeah, they are running the songs as close to half length and always under 3 minutes a song. The commercials aren't run all in one shot either, they will do three 30 second spots (I think, I didn't time it) and later do more, all to keep up the slogan "You're never more than 3 minutes away from another song".
 
DJKraze said:
And that's why I'm baffled as to why they are doing this

It's just an internet radio station (I think) - they've gotta differentiate themselves from typical terrestrial radio in order to get hits
 
There are a bunch of songs on CHR now that are 3 minutes or under Icona Pop, Anna Kendrick, Bruno Mars, Imagine Dragons...the artists are there already.
 
DJKraze said:
As I was looking at charts on All Access last month I noticed an ad for http://quickhitz.com/ and a statement that they play 24 songs an hour, every hour, I was curious and a bit fearful of what I figured for being a bunch of time compressed songs, REALLY squished down to almost nothing. It wasn't quite that (though some songs do seem a bit faster paced) it was chopping and pasting until a song is less than 3 minutes (at least the commercial breaks were less than 3 minutes as well).

I found it interesting that someone would put a patent on a method many DJ's for years have used to make scoped demos! I myself have edited some songs to adjust the length to suit my program purposes. Does this mean something I was doing as far back as 1979 will now get me into trouble for patent infringement? ;)

Anyhow, I told some non radio (er, I mean normal) people about it and they were horrified by the idea of cutting down the songs, in fact most would like it if the songs were at least 4 minutes in length. Has any radio station actually considered jumping on the bandwagon?

What an interesting concept! I tried the online station this morning and enjoyed it but I couldn't continue later with my phone. On their mobile platform, they offer a demo but no live streaming. Does anyone know if they are planning to incorporate mobile streaming at some point in the future?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom