F
FreddyE1977
Guest
at least they didn't pipe in WTIC in Hartford, where the top of the hour beep was actually
a muti-tonal beeping arrangement of Yankee Doodle.
a muti-tonal beeping arrangement of Yankee Doodle.
dB said:Geeks get their beep direct from WWV......
GrizzledVet said:Is that something that really makes a difference to the great unwashed, or is it just an "insider" thing that only radio pros notice?
I'll be kind enough to take your question at face value although my gut impression is that you may be trying to again sour a simple discussion and respect for the people being discussed here who did their jobs extremely well.
Part of the craft of radio is to build forward motion and maintain consistency. Practitioners understand this and respect those who do it well. Listeners, or "the great unwashed" as you put it, may or may not expressly observe or appreciate it, but they indeed are impacted and can be drawn to those who practice the craft and steer the ship well.
Absent the formatics, radio is nothing but an iPOD or Juke Box. There is a reason for formatics whether you appreciate it or not -- just as a movie has credits, titles and scenes; just as a book has a table of contents, chapters and index; and just as sentences have capital letters and punctuation.
Talk_Dude said:I've never encountered any enterprise that had enough resources to address every possible variable with all the attention that each one needed. There was always a need to prioritize activities in order to devote maximum attention to the most important, and less attention to those activities that wouldn't negatively impact the bottom line if they were less than perfect. So, in this case, I'm not saying that hitting the top of hour button isn't somewhere on the list of things for station management to worry about. I'm only asking if it belongs at the top of the list, or a little lower down the list.
jmtillery said:Talk_Dude said:I've never encountered any enterprise that had enough resources to address every possible variable with all the attention that each one needed. There was always a need to prioritize activities in order to devote maximum attention to the most important, and less attention to those activities that wouldn't negatively impact the bottom line if they were less than perfect. So, in this case, I'm not saying that hitting the top of hour button isn't somewhere on the list of things for station management to worry about. I'm only asking if it belongs at the top of the list, or a little lower down the list.
Properly and professionally executed programming is the most important element of any radio station. A station can have the best signal and the best sales staff; However, unless that same station also has the programming listeners actually want and adverstisers will actually sponsor, the best signal and the best sales staff means nothing as there is nothing to deliver via that great signal and nothing worthwhile for the sales staff to sell. All these "little" and seemingly insignificant details of programming, executed properly, add up collectively to create an awesome sounding radio station.
FreddyE1977 said:at least they didn't pipe in WTIC in Hartford, where the top of the hour beep was actually
a muti-tonal beeping arrangement of Yankee Doodle.
Talk_Dude said:jmtillery said:Talk_Dude said:I've never encountered any enterprise that had enough resources to address every possible variable with all the attention that each one needed. There was always a need to prioritize activities in order to devote maximum attention to the most important, and less attention to those activities that wouldn't negatively impact the bottom line if they were less than perfect. So, in this case, I'm not saying that hitting the top of hour button isn't somewhere on the list of things for station management to worry about. I'm only asking if it belongs at the top of the list, or a little lower down the list.
Properly and professionally executed programming is the most important element of any radio station. A station can have the best signal and the best sales staff; However, unless that same station also has the programming listeners actually want and adverstisers will actually sponsor, the best signal and the best sales staff means nothing as there is nothing to deliver via that great signal and nothing worthwhile for the sales staff to sell. All these "little" and seemingly insignificant details of programming, executed properly, add up collectively to create an awesome sounding radio station.
Whatever you say. I guess I'm wrong, and people will listen to a station that plays music that they don't like so long as the little and seemingly insignificant details of programming make it an awesome sounding radio station.
Kinda makes worrying about playlists and what music format pick kind of pointless, doesn't it?
Talk_Dude said:Whatever you say. I guess I'm wrong, and people will listen to a station that plays music that they don't like so long as the little and seemingly insignificant details of programming make it an awesome sounding radio station.
Kinda makes worrying about playlists and what music format pick kind of pointless, doesn't it?
jmtillery said:Talk_Dude said:Whatever you say. I guess I'm wrong, and people will listen to a station that plays music that they don't like so long as the little and seemingly insignificant details of programming make it an awesome sounding radio station.
Kinda makes worrying about playlists and what music format pick kind of pointless, doesn't it?
First of all, no one has said you are wrong as you bring up very good points. Please go back and re-read my original post and you will find that I said "properly executed programming (not properly executed sub-elements alone) is the most important element" as that is the product that a station is selling to its listeners and advertisers. Without it, a station is giving listeners no reason to listen; hence there is nothing to sell to potential advertisers resulting in no station income. Programming, as you are well aware, consist of multiple sub-elements, including music if the station happens to be a music station, that collectively make up the general term "programming". All the sub-elements combined work together to create the completed programming resulting in an overall station sound and image. If one removes any of the sub-elements, in many instances the overall station sound will come across as compromised.
Talk_Dude said:Sorry, I read your post in the context of the overall conversation, not as an independent piece of unrelated prose.
So, while it is certainly accurate to note that getting any sub-element wrong will make a station's sound come across as compromised, it's also irrelevant.
jmtillery said:Talk_Dude said:Sorry, I read your post in the context of the overall conversation, not as an independent piece of unrelated prose.
So, while it is certainly accurate to note that getting any sub-element wrong will make a station's sound come across as compromised, it's also irrelevant.
We can always agree to disagree; However, my comments were, and still are, very much related to the overall discussion which makes the overall point very much relevant. Opposing perspectives are very much welcomed and embraced for constructive discussion purposes. However, simply because you may disagree with an opinion, view or comment does not invalidate said opinion, view or comment and, instead, render said opinion, view or comment as unrelated nor irrelevant. Each are still very much valid, related and relevant to the overall discussion even though you may completely disagree.
Talk_Dude said:The past is passed. It's now today. It's not yesterday. So get over it. The rest of us have. You should, too."