• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Racism allegations at Service Broadcasting

"You don’t deserve to work in the service industry when you don’t know how to treat people right. I put up wIth A LOT of bulls**t from you dawg that has affected my mental health.
I’m just now getting warmed up honestly dawg and I ain’t even the type of n**ga for this until you disrespect me tooo far."


That's apparently from Q, the DJ who is black. LOL he's using the n-word too.
I had to * out some of the cussing but he apparently did cuss in plain site.
 
Definitely a poorly written article, and it seems like someone was easily triggered. Sounds like there's probably a history between the two people. Hard to tell for sure.

Probably a lot of people out there who don't understand (or care to understand) the Master/Slave thing in electronics or mechanical things. Where I work some wording has been changed to Master/Secondary because it's easier than trying to explain that no one is talking about people, just inanimate objects, and they don't really need to be offended.
 
There's no "article," just an emotional social media post.

Also, people were fussing about "master" and "slave" hard drives, "motherboards", etc. since the 1990s, if not earlier. It's a big political thing and it's probably not worth kicking the bees' nest.
 
So is this white DJ (former) married to his black co-host (former)? He seems to be getting a lot of heat for being married to a black woman, but no one specifically.
 
I even recall the argument went back further, about things like manholes. I suppose as far as sexual equality goes, it is wise to be careful what you wish for especially when it comes to language.

As for the subject of this thread: Very poorly written and seemingly difficult for the person to clarify the subject of the complaint. I gathered, however, this seems to be more about personality clashes than anything else.
 
I even recall the argument went back further, about things like manholes.

"Man-to-man" defense in women's basketball, too. Yet "woman to woman" and "person to person" remain uncommon in broadcasts I've listened to, even from female announcers, maybe because the former sounds like it refers to an honest sit-down conversation and the latter sounds like it refers to an operator-assisted phone call.
 
Very poorly written and seemingly difficult for the person to clarify the subject of the complaint.

Keep in mind that not everything you read online was written by a human, and may not even come from this country. I was just reading an article that kept referring to this place called "Home," and what I realized is they were talking about the House of Representatives.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom