Here is my response to statements on this subject made on another board...
>Radials must be bare copper wire
>buried at least a few inches underground.
Quoting Edmund Laport's Radio Antenna Engineering (McGraw-Hill 1952) about installing radials for MW antennas:
"The depth of the wires is immaterial, whether the soil be moist or dry. They may be placed on the surface except that they are then subject to injury and prevent the use of the land for other purposes."
When the radials are not buried, it doesn't matter whether or not they are bare. The currents they carry are r-f currents, which enter the wires by radiation. The earth itself is a rather good insulator, and bare wires buried in the earth are therefore surrounded by "insulation," also.
>The longer the radials are, the better
>ground contact you will get.
The improvement in the performance of the ground system with added radial number/length comes not from "better ground contact," but from the fact that they then intercept more of the r-f current induced into the earth by the vertical radiator-- most of which is contained in a circular area around the radiator having a radius of about 1/2 wavelength.
If better ground contact was the only issue, that could be achieved by burying short coils, zig-zags, or loops of wire of the same total length, or copper plates having the same surface area as the normal radial system layout. But it wouldn't work well, because the r-f currents then have to travel through 1/2-wavelength or so of earth to reach those conductors, and in doing so they have encountered high r-f losses before they ever reach the buried ground conductors. Those losses are in series with the antenna current, and so the radiation efficiency of the antenna system is reduced.
//
>Radials must be bare copper wire
>buried at least a few inches underground.
Quoting Edmund Laport's Radio Antenna Engineering (McGraw-Hill 1952) about installing radials for MW antennas:
"The depth of the wires is immaterial, whether the soil be moist or dry. They may be placed on the surface except that they are then subject to injury and prevent the use of the land for other purposes."
When the radials are not buried, it doesn't matter whether or not they are bare. The currents they carry are r-f currents, which enter the wires by radiation. The earth itself is a rather good insulator, and bare wires buried in the earth are therefore surrounded by "insulation," also.
>The longer the radials are, the better
>ground contact you will get.
The improvement in the performance of the ground system with added radial number/length comes not from "better ground contact," but from the fact that they then intercept more of the r-f current induced into the earth by the vertical radiator-- most of which is contained in a circular area around the radiator having a radius of about 1/2 wavelength.
If better ground contact was the only issue, that could be achieved by burying short coils, zig-zags, or loops of wire of the same total length, or copper plates having the same surface area as the normal radial system layout. But it wouldn't work well, because the r-f currents then have to travel through 1/2-wavelength or so of earth to reach those conductors, and in doing so they have encountered high r-f losses before they ever reach the buried ground conductors. Those losses are in series with the antenna current, and so the radiation efficiency of the antenna system is reduced.
//