Made Up Stuff
I've been in the business long enough to remember what it was like 40 years ago, and 30 years ago, and 20 years ago. The number of opportunities to talk and entertain - even in the Drake format - was considerably greater than 4-5 times per hour. There were fewer and shorter liners and positioning statements. Sklar was even less restrictive.
Charlie Tuna - and everybody elso on KHJ during the "Boss Radio" era - had a lot more opportunity to entertain than anybody outside of morning drive today. Drake, Sklar, and every other good programmer all said one thing: Don't talk unless you've got something entertaining and/or informative to say - and say it succinctly. Now, the edict is "Read the liner and get out". Audiences know that most of what they're getting on many stations is just another selling job and not anything with real entertainment value. Half of what's said ("much more music", "another ten in a row", etc.) is a flat out lie anyway, reducing the credibility of the jock anyway.
Put Seacrest the same format as a local guy, and he'll be lucky to get the same numbers that the local guys do. Give the local guys a little more leeway, and you might discover the next Seacrest. At the very least, the local guys will be more entertaining than they are now. It's not about :60 gab fests between records. It's about unstructured opportunities to add value to the program within the confines of intros or around other programming elements.
I've been in the business long enough to remember what it was like 40 years ago, and 30 years ago, and 20 years ago. The number of opportunities to talk and entertain - even in the Drake format - was considerably greater than 4-5 times per hour. There were fewer and shorter liners and positioning statements. Sklar was even less restrictive.
Charlie Tuna - and everybody elso on KHJ during the "Boss Radio" era - had a lot more opportunity to entertain than anybody outside of morning drive today. Drake, Sklar, and every other good programmer all said one thing: Don't talk unless you've got something entertaining and/or informative to say - and say it succinctly. Now, the edict is "Read the liner and get out". Audiences know that most of what they're getting on many stations is just another selling job and not anything with real entertainment value. Half of what's said ("much more music", "another ten in a row", etc.) is a flat out lie anyway, reducing the credibility of the jock anyway.
Put Seacrest the same format as a local guy, and he'll be lucky to get the same numbers that the local guys do. Give the local guys a little more leeway, and you might discover the next Seacrest. At the very least, the local guys will be more entertaining than they are now. It's not about :60 gab fests between records. It's about unstructured opportunities to add value to the program within the confines of intros or around other programming elements.