• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Radio Professionals show immaturity, derail HD technical dicussion.

And yet they have not clearly affirmed that a crisply ennuciated c,t,k or other sibilant or percussive derails the
encoding unless limited to the infuriating mud they suggest is acceptable for a major-market signal.

You have broken my radios on a half dozen AMs so far, and I look at this the same as any other act of vandalism, except you have your license steal my full use of the AM radio while the sun and its majestic radiations supress the foul square-wave products.

I wonder how well HD works during solar flares?
 
paul vincent zecchino said:
Dear lovers of good radio -

The above encyclicals illustrate character assassination and the same tired misleadings.

Tedious false tales and techno-dissemblings failed the cheerleaders. Moralizing, vis-a-vis line-by-line chiding schoolmarm commentaries to my boorish pig-ignorant canards is last year's gag.

What to do? Claim those who disagree are 'insane' and take issue with 'CIA', 'FBI', etc. Hope no one notices the obvious: Conspiracies aren't at issue. Denial is.

Cheerleaders know investigators and researchers of all stripe listen to language to find truth.

Denial aroused suspicion in previously cited vignettes. Why? It suggests questionable motives.

You're making up junk and spouting Mumbo Jumbo. Somehow you claim people have called you insane. UNTRUE. You claim denial is the issue. Yet you continue to label others as Cheerleader etc. Now I ask you point blank.

WHAT IS IT YOU CLAIM I DENY?

How about it. NO MORE OF YOUR SPINNING, LYING, CIA, FBI, CONCOCTED stories or any other of your foolishness.

What are you are Cheerleaders' sullen behavior, despite victory, suggested unfinished business. Now the word is out. Seems so is the 'the jury'. Citizens and the majority of broadcasters have yet to decide.

More inuendo and mumbo jumbo.

Again I ask you IN THE LIGHT OF DAY...

WHAT IS IT YOU CLAIM I DENY?


Show us your intellect, "Doc". Answer the question.

Clouseau
 
Tom Wells said:
And yet they have not clearly affirmed that a crisply ennuciated c,t,k or other sibilant or percussive derails the
encoding unless limited to the infuriating mud they suggest is acceptable for a major-market signal.

You have broken my radios on a half dozen AMs so far, and I look at this the same as any other act of vandalism, except you have your license steal my full use of the AM radio while the sun and its majestic radiations supress the foul square-wave products.

I wonder how well HD works during solar flares?


Quick they'll be taping for the fall season of the People's Court soon. I could picture you standing in front of judge Judy too. Your suit will mirror the results of Bill O'Reilly's suit against Al Franken.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom