foo1971psu said:
WIOQ just launched a new website that's very nice, clean, and accessible at
http://www.q102.com, and I happen to think B101's site is nice and easy to navigate. WMMR and WYSP have websites that look a bit outdated and cluttered.
Sure, the Q102 site
looks nice, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it's a successful site. To me, it looks like a collection of links and viral content, with no way for users to participate and interact, which is the hallmark of the Internet and the whole point of Mel's call to action here. Q102's site suffers from some of the same problems that Mel described, with the exception this time being that it looks like they hired a designer to repackage the same old stuff.
Looking at this site, I can view videos, I can listen to music on demand, I can read a couple of articles if I click on some links, I can search, and I can vote in a couple of user polls. All of which is fine - but it's gets back to the idea that radio is this one-way communication medium. The only places in which a user gets to talk back to the station or to other listeners are:
1. the phone number hotline and the cell phone text SMS address. can you find them? They are very small and nearly illegible.
2. The "Help Pick the Music We Play" link. There are two of them on this page, and they are buried underneath a mountain of viral videos and celebrity gossip links. When you click through, you're introduced to a survey form that looks nothing like the site and demands you fill out all sorts of personal information. Guess how many of Q102's listeners are going to bother with this feature?
There is nothing available here for users to create a community around, and just the bare minimum available that allows them to bond with the DJs and staff besides a handful of morning show pictures. Again, it's a nice-looking site, but it fails to break out of the one-way pattern that stations fall into and it misses a great opportunity to engage listeners in a truly interactive manner.