J
jbaxter
Guest
WRVA was indeed a disaster under Bloomquist. But I'll bet the newscasters had nice racks.
They wanted to hire a monkey, but Marc Chase wanted someone even more stupid than himself.......CaptnKarl said:How did Mr. Bloomquist get the gig in Atlanta?
cappy... GST was done 3 years ago. randall has had nothing to do with this. if anything he's trying to motivate a staff and make some changes to make gst better. maybe he will, maybe he won't.. maybe gst is dead no matter what and the ATL will get a f.m. talker.CaptnKarl said:I think he’s made poor decisions, fired the wrong people, and seriously damaged GST.The posts I’ve seen here indicate a history of poor decisions in other markets. How did Mr. Bloomquist get the gig in Atlanta?
Agreed. Consolidation was probably the worst thing to happen to terrestrial radio in at least the last 10 years. The Clear Channel's of the world only care about making money and pleasing everyone on Wall Street, not about what the average listener wants to hear. It's too bad that Congress and the FCC don't have the common sense to even address what damage they've caused with the Telecommunications Act of 1996, much less doing anything to reverse it.taylorengineer said:The slide really started when Jacor went into acquisition mode in 1996.It was the beginning of a new era in radio.....one management group trying to manage hundres of radio stations. There was much speculation that it was too much for one group to handle.....and I think experience has taught us exactly that!Randy Micheals, for all his brilliance, was unable to sail these uncharted waters. And so it has been a learning process ever since.....some companies have done better than others. Those who have implemented the "franchise formula" have created some profitability.(ClearChannel does cookie cutter radio)But it has been a STEEP learning curve and the path is littered with dead bodys.Broadcast deregulation is the worst single event in the last 50 years. Broadcast service to the public is a joke.....broadcast has a singular purpose....to create profitability for shareholders. Public interest and service is only a "profitability" consideration.....that is, serve the public if there is money to be made.And for those of us in the industry.....well, it has been interesting. There have been changes(i.e. voice tracking, station consolidation) which have eliminated jobs. It is almost impossible to find a small station to practice your chops on....most have been swallowed by large media groups or are voicetracked. No need for beginners anymore!It is time to break up the big companies and limit ownership. This is not because of profits....this is because it is in the public interest. COMPETITION is good....we need more than 5-6 companies for EFFECTIVE competition.
Hey Captn, you left out the best part of that article, it's where where Bloomquist says: : “Ratings-savvy readers are no doubt shaking their heads at my contention that we succeeded in revamping WBT over the past four years. They know the station's share of the all-important 25-54-year-old audience is no bigger than when I arrived. True enough.” Bloomquist ADMITS the ratings when nowhere during his time at WBT (in fact they actually fell) yet he devotes nine painfully long paragraphs to patting himself on the back for his “accomplishments”! No wonder the magazine printed it, they were able to show Charlotte what a nut case Bloomquist is with his own words.I guess WBT should consider themselves lucky, even they didn't lose 45% of their adult audience in four months like GST has under Bloomie.http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2000/09/25/editorial1.htmlCaptnKarl said:RE: WBTA little online research shows that Mr. Bloomquist is indeed a “hatchet man”.Does anyone on this board have knowledge of Charlotte radio in the late 90’s, and did he bring success to WBT? In a 2000 Charlotte Business Chronicle article, Mr. Bloomquist wrote “My team and I succeeded in that assignment. Four years ago, the station was debilitated by complacency, lack of focus and outdated programming. Today, WBT is a news-talk station of the first order, staffed by dedicated professionals whose work is admired throughout the industry.”Article:http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2000/09/25/editorial1.html
CaptnKarl said:RE: WBTA little online research shows that Mr. Bloomquist is indeed a “hatchet man”.Does anyone on this board have knowledge of Charlotte radio in the late 90’s, and did he bring success to WBT? In a 2000 Charlotte Business Chronicle article, Mr. Bloomquist wrote “My team and I succeeded in that assignment. Four years ago, the station was debilitated by complacency, lack of focus and outdated programming. Today, WBT is a news-talk station of the first order, staffed by dedicated professionals whose work is admired throughout the industry.”Article:http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/stories/2000/09/25/editorial1.html
surfdude said:Capn'...why are you taking this personally? You have an ax to grind?You sound pathetic.I worked with Bloomquist at WBT. He got the job done. Contemporized the station and delivered better "saleable" demos...I know, I was in sales.Is Randall perfect? No. But WGST apparently needs a lot of work.18 months minimum to make a difference.Why this much "discussion" on a non-player in the market?
I kinda like the "non-player".I don’t personally know anyone at GST or Clear Channel, but when you listen to folks for years and they get fired for no apparent reason it feels personal. This forum is a place to vent, and I’m certain that Clear Channel management reads it.We only have two news stations in Atlanta, and I’m just trying to find out why one of them is about to crash and burn due to poor management decisions. The information I’ve found on the Internet and in this forum leads me to believe that Mr. Bloomquist is making mistakes. Perhaps he should join his "mistakes" in the unemployment line.surfdude said:Capn'...why are you taking this personally? You have an ax to grind?You sound pathetic.I worked with Bloomquist at WBT. He got the job done. Contemporized the station and delivered better "saleable" demos...I know, I was in sales.Is Randall perfect? No. But WGST apparently needs a lot of work.18 months minimum to make a difference.Why this much "discussion" on a non-player in the market?
Nancy Zintak also said her Planet Radio would need 18 months to find an audience. She and the Planet Radio moniker were gone before Labor Day 1997, about 3 months. ??? 8) ;Dsurfdude said:To judge WGST this early under Randall's directorshipis just crazy. Let's revisit in 18 months for the true story.(good or bad)
Give him 18 months, so he can lose the other half of the audience? I'm sure WSB, GKA and the Zone would love that.surfdude said:To judge WGST this early under Randall's directorshipis just crazy. Let's revisit in 18 months for the true story.(good or bad)FYI: News/Talk stations do not need high ratings to make money.Many advertisers get great results from "Talk" stations because of the nature of the format.