I'd agree with WTUX that WDEL's programming isn't as strong as it could or should be. Here's how both WDEL and WILM's daytime programming is measured by my ears (here's my spin). WDEL's morning newscast block is fine and well done, other than their weather teases (we've discussed this previously). WILM's morning news block is just as good without the weather tease as they give the actual basic forecast each time they mention the weather adding more detail and the three day outlook at their :15 and :45 weather breaks.
Mark Fowser's 11:30 mid day newscast is well done, but only for a 1/2 hour as WILM airs Rush at noon. WDEL's midday report with Allan Loudell (at 12 noon) is well done also, but one problem I have with his newscast is Allan tries to jam too many interviews in a half hour block so they are rushed and quite often too short where he ends up cutting off the interviewee for traffic on the nines or a spot break of some sort. His newscast would be better, in my opinion with one less interview per half hour allowing more time with the interview he'd be doing.
As far as the day time talk goes. WDEL's local talk, quite often isn't as interesting as the national talkers of Beck, Limbaugh, or Hannity. Al Messitti's show is, for my ear, a more interesting show when he's talking national issues rather than about local yokel stuff. Al seems to be better informed about the news and history, of events, etc, than Rick Jensen and doesn't seem to exagerate as much as Rick. I've caught Rick a couple of times saying something that I knew for a fact to be incorrect. I called him on one this past Friday to correct him on one. Rick doesn't particularly like to be corrected, any time I've done that, I can guarantee it will be a short call. He doesn't get nasty, but the call doesn't last long either as they always seem to have to break for spots, traffic, or news and when I've corrected him I don't get invited to hang on till after the spot break. Rick now has a new liberal co-host( I forget his name), who's ok, but sounds stiff to my ears. The chemistry isn't there between the two hosts. Their show is more interesting when they are discussing national issues versus what's going on in Dover. I've no axe to grind against Rick, but am offering my point of view as a listener/caller to his show and why I don't listen or call often. On the days I want to listen to talk rather than Classical Music on WRTI (107.7 for Wilmington) I go around the dial between WDEL/WILM/WPHT(for Beck)/WHYY-FM and the show that's of the most interest gets my ear. If none then I'll listen to an audio book or go back to WRTI or listen to my music CD's.
Frankly, if I were programming WDEL, I'd move Al (who's a liberal) to the afternoon opposite Rush and Hannity and put on Glenn Beck from 9am-12noon opposite Watson (who's a moderate liberal, in his words) who's local on WILM at that time. I'd have Al spend far less time with local issues. Have Loudell do a longer interview, but not as many in each show. Also, arrange my spot breaks differently during the local talk. It seems that you get 5 minutes of spots/traffic/weather/ and 5-7 minutes of talk. That too might be why they can't hold listeners. It gets tedious with all the interruptions so that there is no real flow to their local talk shows that you get with the national ones. They certainly can drop the PSA's as they seem to have plenty of actual spots to air thus shortening the amount of interruptions.
Again, these are not personal attacks against Al, Rick, or Allan, just what I'd do differently if I were PD at WDEL.
If I were the PD at WILM, I'd move Watson to opposite of Jensen's show and put Glenn Beck on during Al's show.