• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Ratings

Fenway1912 said:
The Globe refuses to pay Neilsen and nobody with access is willing to leak data.
Click to expand...
Newspapers and news websites don't pay for the "overview" Nielsen ratings summaries. But they have to fill in non-disclosure and other agreements and accept certain terms.

With newspapers so understaffed and in such decline today, they likely have nobody to do that work or don't consider it newsworthy today.
 
DavidEduardo said:
Newspapers and news websites don't pay for the "overview" Nielsen ratings summaries. But they have to fill in non-disclosure and other agreements and accept certain terms.

With newspapers so understaffed and in such decline today, they likely have nobody to do that work or don't consider it newsworthy today.
Click to expand...
@DavidEduardo

A few years ago there was a blogger in RI known as New England One who cultivated relationships and got the data but then vanished.

The general consensus is WBZ and WCVB are very close for 1 and 2.
WHDH is a very healthy third
WFXT seems to do well in the mornings.
WBTS is a dumpster fire.
 
WFXT does do well in the mornings, but ever since they got rid of Saturday night news, their evening numbers have been a disaster.
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom