I'll start off by saying I agree with Audioguy that part 15 on the broadcast bands is a great hobby! When you're in the mood for tech/theory, there's always more to learn. Whether you're in the mood to build anything from an on-air light to an audio circuit, you can pretty much always put it right to use. For the music/program side of it, any time is a good time to go looking for new stuff that'll be entertaining and interesting (maybe even educational). Then you get to enjoy the programs you've put together and the sound of your station. Maybe you have some neighbors that like to listen in, maybe not, but there's a certain feeling of accomplishment from putting together good shows and having a good sounding signal anyway.
Some of us just aren't pleased with the directions media and radio have taken over the years.. But with the part 15 hobby, at least at OUR houses it can be different. Maybe some neighbor's houses as well. We can be an alternative without a program director somewhere having to decide if it's worth the risk to try something different when a failure for the big stations can mean people taking pay cuts or losing jobs or their station going under.
I'm not sure as I know how realistic it is for most of us to say we do it "for the community". Unless you do it on a scale like Terry Brown at the Wellsville Ohio station, realistically I think it's more likely to be a small fragment of your community. Like the near part of your own neighborhood. Nothing wrong with that, though.
I do find it interesting how many people talk about it as "community" radio, but all they ever seem to post about is range and technical points. On these boards you see only brief mentions of what sort of programs or what music their listeners like or how to get someone to react positively if they *are* listening. No offense intended folks, but if someone new reads these boards they could likely get the idea that it's all about who can piddle the furthest and who has the most expensive toys rather than catching and firing their imagination for what it'd actually be like to run one of these tiny stations.
I don't think that the deep tech talk when folks like Rich get going harms the hobby. I think most newbies would get glazed eyes about the time the first set of charts and equations get posted and they'll just hop to the next post. So long as we keep it civil and act like reasonable ladies and gentlemen, I think the average newcomer probably expects some of the tech talk to be a bit over their heads sometimes. And I think it's is *good* that there's some real depth to the technical and legal discussions, because even if they don't understand it all at first, that beginner can sense that there's a whole lot that can be learned about how and why things work.
I agree with Audioguy that people not understanding that part 15 stations are not "pirates" is one of the BIG problems we face as hobbyists. One of my neighbors when I first started my station really got into living right next door to a station. He'd listen any time he knew I was on the air and would come over and *ask* me to put it on the air sometimes if he was having friends over for a cookout in the backyard. Very positive attention. But it took over a year before he actually understood that I wasn't running a pirate station. It's funny and I laugh about it now.. But it wouldn't have been so funny if he hadn't liked my station and had thought I was a pirate. That could have meant an unfriendly visit from the FCC as being MUCH more likely than anything anybody has ever said in any online forum during a technical or legal debate about part 15. One thing we could really use would be some brainstorming on ways to educate the public about the difference between pirates and legal part 15 stations.
Another place where I feel there is a real threat to the continued existence of part 15 is likely to upset some folks in the hobby. I do not feel it is good to try to compete with licensed stations, *especially* when it comes to selling ad time. Firstly, why do we need to be "commercial" anyway? Yes, I am aware that there isn't any rule against being commercial and selling ads, but why should we need to? We're hobbyists serving usually a very small fragment of the community at best, and the licensed stations are businesses with employees that need the paychecks that come from ad money to survive. If we run ads, then it's not unreasonably for them to see it as us taking food right out of their kids' mouths.. If they see us as that sort of threat, even on a small scale, they'll do everything they can to get part 15 on the broadcast bands shut down for good.
Besides, aren't there enough advertisements/commercials on the radio already? Why should we want to add to that? I don't understand the impulse to take an enjoyable hobby and treat it like it *has* to make money before it's worthwhile or "serious" enough. Maybe I'm just weird or slow-witted or something because I don't see it. But I personally think it is one of the things that can put the hobby at risk.
Another thing I see as putting the hobby at risk is the endless talk in the gear ads and on the forums about "range". It ends up being a contest for who says they can piddle the furthest and gear ads implying that you too can be running your own radio station that can be heard from miles away if you'll just shell out the shekels to buy their product. Sure, it's ego food, it's a point of pride, it's bragging rights.. But "range" is always a meaningless number unless you know the quality of the receiver and it's antenna that was used to get that number. It boils down to being hype. Useful mostly for selling gear or maybe for selling ad-time and in both those cases the range reported will be as optimistic as can be gotten away with. But you want to keep bragging up the range of your product or your station? I can't think of a surer way to get the licensed stations yelling even louder about part 15 devices all the way down to the smallest "FM modulator" that actually barely has enough range to make it from the front seat to the car radio that's maybe 3 ft away when you're using it to listen to your CD player or mp3 player in the car. They already complain about even the bitsy little Belkins and etc. But hey, keep going on about "amazing range" and they'll want *all* part 15 taken off the broadcast bands.
It's maybe comforting to think that folks like Rich "put part 15 at risk" by asking questions, and to think that's "the only problem".. But I think there's more putting us at risk than those few questions. And some of it worries me considerably more than Rich's talks about "whip and mast installations with excessive ground lead length" and etc.
Ok, so there's my 2 cents worth of gasoline on this fire. I figure some of it probably will annoy some folks, but having given it a lot of thought over my 2 yrs of running a station, those are my thoughts on these matters.
It's still a fascinating hobby and a lot of fun though.
Daniel
Some of us just aren't pleased with the directions media and radio have taken over the years.. But with the part 15 hobby, at least at OUR houses it can be different. Maybe some neighbor's houses as well. We can be an alternative without a program director somewhere having to decide if it's worth the risk to try something different when a failure for the big stations can mean people taking pay cuts or losing jobs or their station going under.
I'm not sure as I know how realistic it is for most of us to say we do it "for the community". Unless you do it on a scale like Terry Brown at the Wellsville Ohio station, realistically I think it's more likely to be a small fragment of your community. Like the near part of your own neighborhood. Nothing wrong with that, though.
I do find it interesting how many people talk about it as "community" radio, but all they ever seem to post about is range and technical points. On these boards you see only brief mentions of what sort of programs or what music their listeners like or how to get someone to react positively if they *are* listening. No offense intended folks, but if someone new reads these boards they could likely get the idea that it's all about who can piddle the furthest and who has the most expensive toys rather than catching and firing their imagination for what it'd actually be like to run one of these tiny stations.
I don't think that the deep tech talk when folks like Rich get going harms the hobby. I think most newbies would get glazed eyes about the time the first set of charts and equations get posted and they'll just hop to the next post. So long as we keep it civil and act like reasonable ladies and gentlemen, I think the average newcomer probably expects some of the tech talk to be a bit over their heads sometimes. And I think it's is *good* that there's some real depth to the technical and legal discussions, because even if they don't understand it all at first, that beginner can sense that there's a whole lot that can be learned about how and why things work.
I agree with Audioguy that people not understanding that part 15 stations are not "pirates" is one of the BIG problems we face as hobbyists. One of my neighbors when I first started my station really got into living right next door to a station. He'd listen any time he knew I was on the air and would come over and *ask* me to put it on the air sometimes if he was having friends over for a cookout in the backyard. Very positive attention. But it took over a year before he actually understood that I wasn't running a pirate station. It's funny and I laugh about it now.. But it wouldn't have been so funny if he hadn't liked my station and had thought I was a pirate. That could have meant an unfriendly visit from the FCC as being MUCH more likely than anything anybody has ever said in any online forum during a technical or legal debate about part 15. One thing we could really use would be some brainstorming on ways to educate the public about the difference between pirates and legal part 15 stations.
Another place where I feel there is a real threat to the continued existence of part 15 is likely to upset some folks in the hobby. I do not feel it is good to try to compete with licensed stations, *especially* when it comes to selling ad time. Firstly, why do we need to be "commercial" anyway? Yes, I am aware that there isn't any rule against being commercial and selling ads, but why should we need to? We're hobbyists serving usually a very small fragment of the community at best, and the licensed stations are businesses with employees that need the paychecks that come from ad money to survive. If we run ads, then it's not unreasonably for them to see it as us taking food right out of their kids' mouths.. If they see us as that sort of threat, even on a small scale, they'll do everything they can to get part 15 on the broadcast bands shut down for good.
Besides, aren't there enough advertisements/commercials on the radio already? Why should we want to add to that? I don't understand the impulse to take an enjoyable hobby and treat it like it *has* to make money before it's worthwhile or "serious" enough. Maybe I'm just weird or slow-witted or something because I don't see it. But I personally think it is one of the things that can put the hobby at risk.
Another thing I see as putting the hobby at risk is the endless talk in the gear ads and on the forums about "range". It ends up being a contest for who says they can piddle the furthest and gear ads implying that you too can be running your own radio station that can be heard from miles away if you'll just shell out the shekels to buy their product. Sure, it's ego food, it's a point of pride, it's bragging rights.. But "range" is always a meaningless number unless you know the quality of the receiver and it's antenna that was used to get that number. It boils down to being hype. Useful mostly for selling gear or maybe for selling ad-time and in both those cases the range reported will be as optimistic as can be gotten away with. But you want to keep bragging up the range of your product or your station? I can't think of a surer way to get the licensed stations yelling even louder about part 15 devices all the way down to the smallest "FM modulator" that actually barely has enough range to make it from the front seat to the car radio that's maybe 3 ft away when you're using it to listen to your CD player or mp3 player in the car. They already complain about even the bitsy little Belkins and etc. But hey, keep going on about "amazing range" and they'll want *all* part 15 taken off the broadcast bands.
It's maybe comforting to think that folks like Rich "put part 15 at risk" by asking questions, and to think that's "the only problem".. But I think there's more putting us at risk than those few questions. And some of it worries me considerably more than Rich's talks about "whip and mast installations with excessive ground lead length" and etc.
Ok, so there's my 2 cents worth of gasoline on this fire. I figure some of it probably will annoy some folks, but having given it a lot of thought over my 2 yrs of running a station, those are my thoughts on these matters.
It's still a fascinating hobby and a lot of fun though.
Daniel