• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Receiver sensitivity question for rfry

A

am1670acr

Guest
Here's a story problem! Assuming both vehicles are identical with stock antennas.

Carl has an FCC certified Part-15 FM transmitter at his house broadcasting surf music. Carl has two friends that like surf music, George and Robert. George just bought a new car radio from Crutchfield, it has an FM sensitivity of 8 dBf. Robert's car radio has an FM sensitivity of 10 dBf. As Carl's transmitter is abiding by the Part 15 rule - 250 uV/m at 3 meters, how far will George be able to listen clearly to Carl's surf music? How far will Robert be able to listen to Carl's surf music.
 
Re: It depends......

> Here's a story problem! Assuming both vehicles are identical
> with stock antennas.
>
> Carl has an FCC certified Part-15 FM transmitter at his
> house broadcasting surf music. Carl has two friends that
> like surf music, George and Robert. George just bought a new
> car radio from Crutchfield, it has an FM sensitivity of 8
> dBf. Robert's car radio has an FM sensitivity of 10 dBf. As
> Carl's transmitter is abiding by the Part 15 rule - 250 uV/m
> at 3 meters, how far will George be able to listen clearly
> to Carl's surf music? How far will Robert be able to listen
> to Carl's surf music.
>
Their isnt that much noticable difference between 8 DBF, and 10 DBF.. Although, the lower the number, the better the reception. If Carls station is a part 15 fm, it probably covers about a quarter mile, depending on how high his Antenna is mounted. I can pick up my part 15 fm Between a Quarter mile, to a half mile, but I have detected my signal a full mile away at times, This is with (NO) outdoor antenna, with the TX at ground level, with a Wire taped to my window, However, Yesterday, a huge DX opening was preventing me from barely transmitting around the block, so alot of it depends on how clear Carls frequency is, part 15 just isnt powerful enough to overide Licensed stations, when they come Booming in from a distance.
 
Midwest and FM DX'g...

> Their isnt that much noticable difference between 8 DBF, and
> 10 DBF.. Although, the lower the number, the better the
> reception. If Carls station is a part 15 fm, it probably
> covers about a quarter mile, depending on how high his
> Antenna is mounted. I can pick up my part 15 fm Between a
> Quarter mile, to a half mile, but I have detected my signal
> a full mile away at times, This is with (NO) outdoor
> antenna, with the TX at ground level, with a Wire taped to
> my window, However, Yesterday, a huge DX opening was
> preventing me from barely transmitting around the block, so
> alot of it depends on how clear Carls frequency is, part 15
> just isnt powerful enough to overide Licensed stations, when
> they come Booming in from a distance.
>

Midwest,

I'm sure you're into FM DX'g from the sounds of the problem you have below, but you can improve on your distance and sensitivity, but alas the transmitter ouput is the biggest challenge, below I've posted some of my results with this:



Fm has two types of listeners, one is the kind that listens to stations close to their city or town of reception and is for entertainment purposes only, the second kind is the long distance listener that wants to pick signals on FM as far away as possible (DX), these stations are as far away as 1000 miles away or farther in some cases. Listening to these particular stations one must have an excellent tuner with sensitivity and selectivity for recieving and capturing such weak signals.

There are only a few excellent models of FM tuners available for the purpose of long distance FM reception (FM DX) at
present and most of these are very hard to come by either though Ebay auctions, audio Hi-FI warehouses, and or electronics stores.

Today, most audio hi-fi stores mostly sell AM/FM receivers (tuner and amplifier in one unit). Receivers are quite different from dedicated FM tuners, in terms of selectivity, sensitivity, and image rejection. Even just an FM tuner with no AM or amplifiers is better than the complete AM/FM Stereo combo in terms of quality components and IF stages, etc.

Radioshack in it's earlier days had very good FM tuners but are mostly gone or lost through time and neglect, the new stuff is junk. I still have the 'Realistic FM Tuner Model TM 1000' bought back in 1978 and it is very well made, not the cheap stuff made today... the tuning capacitor is approx 2x3.5 inches alone and the IF stages are excellent with very good sensitivity and selectivity.

Back in 1995 when I moved to Savannah, I had to learn how to correctly interpret FM tuner specifications to get the feel for finding that perfect tuner/reciever to get stations in the Caribbean and South Florida locations, so I ended up buying a model that didn't quite not meet the specs as needed but good enough for a start in modifying it to get close to the untouchable 'Onkyo T series of FM tuners', the 'Onkyo T-9090 II' being the 'primo' in terms of sensitivity and selectivity.

Even some portable FM/AM/SSB radios from Grundig (Satellit 700) and the Panasonic RF-B Series radios with just whip antennas get reception of signals as far away as 900 miles.

The Grundig S350 does a good job on the FM side if it's hook up to my FM Yagi... JasonW, hope you got yours and testing it to see how you like it.

Right now these are the 'best' FM tuners you can get your hands on in terms of FM long distance recieving (DX), Ebay is a good choice to try to find these and audio/electronics repair or salvage is another.

Onkyo T-9090 II
Onkyo T-4711.
Onkyo T-488F.
Denon TU 1500RD
Yamaha T-85.
Sony ST-SA5ES.
Kenwood KT-6040


Me, I have the Sony STR-D615 FM/AM Tuner and it's modified at the IF stages to improve signal/noise ratio and improve the sensitivity/selectivity. This receiver is coupled to an FM 8 eight element yagi antenna, which has approximately 6 dBd gain according to the manufacturer... it could be improved by adding more elements. I've been able to get stations as far away 300-1000 miles away, maybe not full stereo and of excellent listening quality but listenable, sorta like shortwave DX'g.

Some of the sources here are borrowed from the FM DX'er sites saved for reference:


Sensitivity:

Sensitivity at FM frequencies of 88-108MHz makes FM DX'g, better suited to hearing better quality signals
(atmospheric and man-made noise is alot lower than AM). The surrounding noise levels at 88-108 MHz are
typically 2-5dB, so the FM tuner's RF amplifier front-end noise is very important to be the lowest possible.

FM tuners that are very sensitive usually feature Mosfet transistors in the first RF (radio frequency) stage.
The low noise features of mosfet transistors makes them very desireable, sensitivity for weak signals is
excellent when used in the front end of the IF stages.

Noise figures are about 2-3 dB for quality sensitive FM tuners that employ MosFETs in the first RF stage.

Modern FM tuners (post 1987) are capable of producing extremely weak reception you can just hear with signal inputs as low as 1/10th of a microvolt (0.1 uV). At 1 microvolt (1 uV), a quality tuner will produce enough FM quieting to enable almost noise-free reception.

How do you know if your tuner is suitable for FM DX'g?

Most sensitive FM tuners are able to detect FM signal meteor scatter "pings" almost anytime of the day. If meteor scatter pings can't be heard on vacant channels, the tuner's RF sensitivity is not good enough for FM DX, The tuner must be connected to an efficient high gain external directional high gain FM antenna such as a FM yagi with sufficient elements.

Sensitivity ratings are usually expressed in microvolts (uV), and the lower the number the better. Another rating scale sometimes used is the femtowatt (dBf). This indicates a tuner's sensitivity, regardless of its input impedance (usually 75 or 300ohms). In most tuner brochures, you will find the IHF sensitivity rating, which is for weak mono signals. This corresponds to a -30-dB level of total harmonic distortion plus noise (THD+N), that is a mono signal with 3% distortion. The IHF mono sensitivity specification is also called useable sensitivity, which means the weakest signal most non-DXers would be prepared to tolerate. IHF useable sensitivity usually ranges from 0.6uV (6.7dBf) to 1uV (11.2dBf). The lower the figure the better.

A tuner's ability to receive weak stereo signals is indicated by the IHF usable stereo sensitivity figure, which usually ranges from 2uV (11.2dBf) to around 4uV (17dBf).

The 50dB quieting level will indicate how strong a DX signal has to be to reach hiss-free level, and that is often more important to those who like HI-FI FM DX. At 50dB stereo signal-to-noise-ratio, the tuner's hiss is only 0.3% of the audio, and in a good FM tuner, that will be obtained with no more than 17uV (36.1dBf). The 50dB mono quieting specification is usually no more than 1.7uV with a good tuner.

By using a low noise (2dB noise figure) tunable MosFET FM preamplifier, it's possible to achieve state-of-the-art RF sensitivity which will beat any top-line FM tuners. Even if the pre-amplifier is used indoors, the tuner's RF front-end noise figure is improved.

If you find that the sensitivity of your FM tuner is not improved by the use of a pre-amplifier, the external noise levels are either fairly high, or your FM tuner's noise level is sufficiently low, so then external noise becomes the limiting factor.


Selectivity:

Selectivity refers to a tuner's ability to receive a weak station in the presence of stronger stations at slightly lower or higher frequencies.

"Alternate" selectivity refers to the tuner's ability to suppress interference from signals plus and minus 400kHz away from the tuned frequency. A rating of 80dB is good; while 100dB is excellent.

"Adjacent" selectivity refers to suppression of signals plus and minus 200kHz away from the tuned frequency, and is usually no better than 50dB on a FM tuner featuring narrow IF bandwidth.

One example of a tuner with good selectivity is the Onkyo T-9090 II FM tuner, which will suppress signals plus and minus 300kHz away from the desired station by a factor of 10,000 (80dB). Signals plus and minus 400kHz away from the desired station are suppressed by a factor of 56,200 (95dB). These figures indicate excellent shape factor selectivity, considering the -3dB point is 150kHz.

The unmodified Sony STR D615 AM/FM Tuner specs are (60db) at 400khz with a 4.5uv of sensitivity at 50db quieting and 2uv 11.5dbf sensitivity.

Modifying the reciever for high selectivity is achieved by using several 150kHz ceramic filters in series in the 10.7 MHz IF strip. Some DX enthusiasts have replaced the stock filters with narrower MURATA 110kHz filters (part no: SFE10.7MHY-A).

Recommended 10.7 MHz IF filters for enhanced FM tuner selecivity performance.

My Sony STR-D615 has selectivity of plus 75db fitted with the Murata SFE10.7 IF filters.

Certain ceramic IF filters are designed for high selectivity and fidelity. The Murata SFE10.7MZ2 is such a filter.

Providing your FM tuner has sufficient IF gain, five 110 KHz filters connected in series, gives the optimum selectivity performance. Five 150 KHz filters connected in series gives the optimum selectivity / fidelity performance.

FM tuners featuring switchable wide or narrow IF bandwidth will have superior selectivity. This is a highly desirable feature for successful FM DXing.

Strong signal handling and spurious rejection:

Many cheaper FM tuners will suffer from overload and spurious images of local stations all over the dial, particularly in city areas. This is often because the tuner's RF amplifier is a bipolar transistor type and has no pre-selection. To achieve overload immunity, a tuner should have a MOSFET RF amplifier front end, tuned with varicap diodes. Dual gate MOSFETs are excellent because they operate linearly over a wide range of signal strengths and also offer a low noise figure, hence feature good sensitivity.

Conclusion is that obtaining the proper equipment and understanding why one can get extremely distant FM stations are just a matter of understanding the proper terms in the specifications of equipment and being able to tweek and modify as needed.

Radiopilot
 
Noise figure with a preamp.

Radiopilot,

Interesting post. I have a comment about one statement though.

>"Even if
> the pre-amplifier is used indoors, the tuner's RF front-end
> noise figure is improved. "

You cannot improve a system's noise figure by using a preamp. It only gets worse. Look up the Friis equation. If you have questions, I will try to answer.

Neil
 
Re: Noise figure with a preamp.

> Radiopilot,
>
> Interesting post. I have a comment about one statement
> though.
>
> >"Even if
> > the pre-amplifier is used indoors, the tuner's RF
> front-end
> > noise figure is improved. "
>
> You cannot improve a system's noise figure by using a
> preamp. It only gets worse. Look up the Friis equation. If
> you have questions, I will try to answer.
>
> Neil
>

Neil,

While I'll agree adding even 10 dB of additional gain into a decent FM band receiver/tuner system is a high guarantee the tuner will cause too much noise living in a high noise area (city, industrial), but if you live in a quiet rural area with few local stations and have a receiver connected to a MosFET or GaAsFET preamp you'll actually improve your FM reception.

In high outside man-made or atmospheric noise, the low noise preamplifiers will usually offer no real improvement to weak FM signals, but if you have a very sensitive FM tuner, which has the best alignment, you don't really need additional external RF pre-amplification.

Which is why I mentioned the best FM tuners to date and also what improvements to the tuner one might do to get that distant station.

Radiopilot
<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by radiopilot on 01/25/06 12:55 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Re: Midwest and FM DX'g...

> I'm sure you're into FM DX'g from the sounds of the problem
> you have below, but you can improve on your distance and
> sensitivity, but alas the transmitter ouput is the biggest
> challenge, below I've posted some of my results with this:
<clip>
______________

Tx power output and receiver system performance are part of it, but at least equally important are (1) how much power the antenna radiates toward the receiver location, and (2) conditions on and near the propagation path.

The radiation patterns of all tx and rx antennas can vary significantly. All FM antennas mounted near any other conductor (auto body, tower, house wiring etc) are affected, and the changes can be substantial.

But even in directions where the tx and rx antenna patterns are at their max values, there can be considerable path loss due to obstructions and reflections. In the worst case, signal strength seen at the RF input of the receiver can be almost zero at some locations within the normal coverage area. This often is noticeable with auto receivers as a "picket fence" effect, where the rx gets very noisy periodically as it moves over fairly short distances.

A receiver spec I would add to Radiopilot's list is capture ratio. This is the ability of the receiver to reject all but the stronger/strongest signal on a given frequency. Good FM receivers have capture ratios of less than 1 dB. Probably one of the best designs in this respect if the Blaupunkt "Digiceiver." A good capture ratio greatly reduces the picket fence effect in autos, and also makes it possible to clearly receive several different FM stations on the same freq (one at a time) just by rotating a directional rx antenna in the right directions.
//
 
Re: Midwest and FM DX'g...

> Tx power output and receiver system performance are part of
> it, but at least equally important are (1) how much power
> the antenna radiates toward the receiver location, and (2)
> conditions on and near the propagation path.
>
> The radiation patterns of all tx and rx antennas can vary
> significantly. All FM antennas mounted near any other
> conductor (auto body, tower, house wiring etc) are affected,
> and the changes can be substantial.
>
> But even in directions where the tx and rx antenna patterns
> are at their max values, there can be considerable path loss
> due to obstructions and reflections. In the worst case,
> signal strength seen at the RF input of the receiver can be
> almost zero at some locations within the normal coverage
> area. This often is noticeable with auto receivers as a
> "picket fence" effect, where the rx gets very noisy
> periodically as it moves over fairly short distances.
>
> A receiver spec I would add to Radiopilot's list is capture
> ratio. This is the ability of the receiver to reject all
> but the stronger/strongest signal on a given frequency.
> Good FM receivers have capture ratios of less than 1 dB.
> Probably one of the best designs in this respect if the
> Blaupunct "Digiceiver." A good capture ratio greatly reduces
> the picket fence effect in autos, and also makes it possible
> to clearly receive several different FM stations on the same
> freq (one at a time) just by rotating a directional rx
> antenna in the right directions.
> //
>


Rfry,

You are correct, 'Capture Ratio' is as important as sensitivity and selectivity... and the lower the capture ratio the better, my Sony STR-D615 has a capture ratio of 1.10db... not bad but it doesn't need to be if you live in an area without alot of powerful FM stations, obstructions, and you are close to open area. I live by the ocean so I point my antenna due South and I pick up Daytona to Miami, from the Bahammas to the Carribbean depending on how I point my antenna... So having the proper equipment and height and location FM DX'g is very interesting, but now the Internet streaming is becoming more popular... one day though the internet may cease to exist in some form or another, then hams and DX'g are back in the mainstream again.

Radiopilot
 
Re: Noise figure with a preamp.

> Radiopilot,
>
> Interesting post. I have a comment about one statement
> though.
>
> >"Even if
> > the pre-amplifier is used indoors, the tuner's RF
> front-end
> > noise figure is improved. "
>
> You cannot improve a system's noise figure by using a
> preamp. It only gets worse. Look up the Friis equation. If
> you have questions, I will try to answer.
>
> Neil
>


Neil,

The Friis formula below and some comments:

The Friis' equation is used to calculate the overall noise figure of a receiver, which is in turn composed of a number of stages, each with its own noise figure and gain. It is given by

F
rec = F1 + F2-1/G1 + F3-1/G1G2 + F4-1/G1G2G3 + ....

Where Fn and Gn are the noise figure and gain, respectively, of the n-th stage.

If adding a preamp or low noise amplifier in front of the tuner the equation becomes:

F
rec = 1/GLNA (Frest-1) + FLNA


where Frest is the overall noise figure of the subsequent stages. According to the equation, the LNA or preamp can reduce the overall noise figure of the receiver, but only if the gain is sufficiently high.

Now most tuners back prior to the 1990's were engineered to get the highest possible performance as most high end tuners were built for the discerning audiophile that listened to classical music and the silent passages indeed needed to be silent, consequently many audio equipment makers for 'top end' equipment took extra care to do this... most tuner/receivers today don't care and only manufacture the limited equipment as they know the overiding factor is wattage and looks. There are some decent makes out there but overall you'll spend plenty for Denon, Carver, etc. and nothing to say their specs are better than some of the stuff made 10-30 years ago.

Radiopilot
 
> George just bought a new
> car radio from Crutchfield, it has an FM sensitivity of 8
> dBf. Robert's car radio has an FM sensitivity of 10 dBf. As
> Carl's transmitter is abiding by the Part 15 rule - 250 uV/m
> at 3 meters, how far will George be able to listen clearly
> to Carl's surf music? How far will Robert be able to listen
> to Carl's surf music.
___________________

One power level that is 2 dB higher than another is greater by ~1.58X. And for the same receiver input circuit impedance values, the voltage change connected with a power change is the square root of the power multiplier, or ~26% in this case.

So if all other things are equal, one receiver whose input sensitivity rating is 2 dBf better than another can be moved to a point where the field strength arriving from the tx antenna is 26% less, and still give the same performance.

On line-of-sight, reflection-free paths, field strength at the rx antenna varies inversely with distance. So if the 10dBf receiver just met spec 0.5 mile from the Part 15 FM tx system, then the 8 dBf receiver would meets its spec at 0.5 x 1.26 = 0.63 miles.

With a matched dipole receive antenna, 0.5 dB of coax loss, and a 98 MHz carrier, the actual field strengths arriving at the rx antenna needed for these receivers to meet spec are...

8 dBf rx = 1.47 uV/m
10 dBf rx = 1.85 uV/m

Note that those voltages are related by a factor of 1.26X, as predictable from the paragraphs above.

//

<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by rfry on 01/25/06 10:18 PM.</FONT></P>
 
> > George just bought a new
> > car radio from Crutchfield, it has an FM sensitivity of 8
> > dBf. Robert's car radio has an FM sensitivity of 10 dBf.
> As
> > Carl's transmitter is abiding by the Part 15 rule - 250
> uV/m
> > at 3 meters, how far will George be able to listen clearly
>
> > to Carl's surf music? How far will Robert be able to
> listen
> > to Carl's surf music.
> ___________________
>
> One power level that is 2 dB higher than another is greater
> by ~1.58X. And for the same receiver input circuit
> impedance values, the voltage change connected with a power
> change is the square root of the power multiplier, or ~26%
> in this case.
>
> So if all other things are equal, one receiver whose input
> sensitivity rating is 2 dBf better than another can be moved
> to a point where the where the field strength arriving from
> the tx antenna is 26% less, and still give the same
> performance.
>
> On line-of-sight, reflection-free paths, field strength at
> the rx antenna varies inversely with distance. So if the
> 10dBf receiver just met spec 0.5 mile from the Part 15 FM tx
> system, then the 8 dBf receiver would meets its spec at 0.5
> x 1.26 = 0.63 miles.
> //
>


This is good Rfry... but to get a better feel for average types of conditions you may encounter in the actual field, try this Java calculator.. you'll need a dbm scale to know how much 'uv' is reaching the receiver...

http://gbppr.dyndns.org/PROJ/mil/ew/urban.main.cgi

The output will be in '-xxdbm' which if you use the dbm scale will give you an actual reading of the strength of your signal so using the below posted data on recievers/tuners you can base how far your receiver can be from the antenna and 'what if' in terms of terrain, power, height, etc.

Mind you this is approx. values and not an exact measurement but calculated distance.

Have fun...:)

Radiopilot
 
> try this Java calculator.. you'll need a dbm scale to know
> how much 'uv' is reaching the receiver...
> The output will be in '-xxdbm' which if you use the dbm
> scale will give you an actual reading of the strength of
> your signal so using the below posted data on
> recievers/tuners you can base how far your receiver can be
> from the antenna and 'what if' in terms of terrain, power,
> height, etc.
__________________

Unfortunately that app does not allow inputting a power low enough for Part 15 levels. Also it doesn't accept tx ant heights less than 30 meters (98.4 feet), which probably is higher than most Part 15 FM tx antennas, and makes a big difference in the answer. Also it does not permit including the gain of the receive antenna system.

All of the above means that this web page output is not very useful for Part 15 FM system evaluations.

//
 
> > try this Java calculator.. you'll need a dbm scale to know
>
> > how much 'uv' is reaching the receiver...
> > The output will be in '-xxdbm' which if you use the dbm
> > scale will give you an actual reading of the strength of
> > your signal so using the below posted data on
> > recievers/tuners you can base how far your receiver can be
>
> > from the antenna and 'what if' in terms of terrain, power,
>
> > height, etc.
> __________________
>
> Unfortunately that app does not allow inputting a power low
> enough for Part 15 levels. Also it doesn't accept tx ant
> heights less than 30 meters (98.4 feet), which probably is
> higher than most Part 15 FM tx antennas, and makes a big
> difference in the answer. Also it does not permit including
> the gain of the receive antenna system.
>
> All of the above means that this web page output is not very
> useful for Part 15 FM system evaluations.
>
> //
>


Rfry,

I beg to differ on this one... If you input .1 watt for the 100mw transmitters everyone is talking about here on this board, and the antenna height is input in 'feet' you will see that the figures are correct.

Please play with it again....

Radiopilot
 
Re: Noise figure with a preamp.

> > Radiopilot,
> >
> > Interesting post. I have a comment about one statement
> > though.
> >
> > >"Even if
> > > the pre-amplifier is used indoors, the tuner's RF
> > front-end
> > > noise figure is improved. "
> >
> > You cannot improve a system's noise figure by using a
> > preamp. It only gets worse. Look up the Friis equation.
> If
> > you have questions, I will try to answer.
> >
> > Neil
> >
>
>
> Neil,
>
> The Friis formula below and some comments:
>
> The Friis' equation is used to calculate the overall noise
> figure of a receiver, which is in turn composed of a number
> of stages, each with its own noise figure and gain. It is
> given by
>
> F
> rec = F1 + F2-1/G1 + F3-1/G1G2 + F4-1/G1G2G3 + ....
>
> Where Fn and Gn are the noise figure and gain, respectively,
> of the n-th stage.
>
> If adding a preamp or low noise amplifier in front of the
> tuner the equation becomes:
>
> F
> rec = 1/GLNA (Frest-1) + FLNA
>
>
> where Frest is the overall noise figure of the subsequent
> stages. According to the equation, the LNA or preamp can
> reduce the overall noise figure of the receiver, but only if
> the gain is sufficiently high.
>
> Now most tuners back prior to the 1990's were engineered to
> get the highest possible performance as most high end tuners
> were built for the discerning audiophile that listened to
> classical music and the silent passages indeed needed to be
> silent, consequently many audio equipment makers for 'top
> end' equipment took extra care to do this... most
> tuner/receivers today don't care and only manufacture the
> limited equipment as they know the overiding factor is
> wattage and looks. There are some decent makes out there but
> overall you'll spend plenty for Denon, Carver, etc. and
> nothing to say their specs are better than some of the stuff
> made 10-30 years ago.
>
> Radiopilot
>

Radiopilot,

Good response and I agree with your analysis. The key to cascading amps is to put the gain and low NR in the first stage. "When building a receiver, put your money up front".

My remark about making things worse is not as generally applicable as I implied. What I had in mind was work I did on VHF systems with low receiver NR numbers in high ambient off signal field strength situations. The preamp was tried to increase the sensitivity of the receiver. To avoid IMD problems, the preamp gain had to be so low that the advantage of first stage gain was not enough to lower the overall NR. In these situations, since we were already using a low NR receiver, there was no advantage to using a preamp and many times I saw a loss in overall NR.

It would seem that if a preamplifier is attached to a low NR receiver, the overall performance can be lowered. A good preamp used with a high NR receiver can lower the overall NR.

So, once again as in many engineering situations, it depends.

Neil
 
> I beg to differ on this one... If you input .1 watt for the
> 100mw transmitters everyone is talking about here on this
> board, and the antenna height is input in 'feet' you will
> see that the figures are correct.
____________

Sorry, but I differ with your differing. A radiated power of 100 mW, or 25 mW or even 1 mW is not a Part 15 FM power -- even if some people think of them as "Part 15." Depending on your definition these are pirate power levels, and thousands of times higher than needed to produce a maximum legal Part 15 FM field with a simple tx antenna.

That, plus the 30-m minimum tx antenna height allowed means the answers from that web app cannot represent a true Part 15 FM operation.

Also the figures cannot be correct if no allowance is made for the gain of the rx antenna or the loss of its transmission line -- and that is true even for systems able to use the powers and heights that the program will accept.
//
 
> > I beg to differ on this one... If you input .1 watt for
> the
> > 100mw transmitters everyone is talking about here on this
> > board, and the antenna height is input in 'feet' you will
> > see that the figures are correct.
> ____________
>
> Sorry, but I differ with your differing. A radiated power
> of 100 mW, or 25 mW or even 1 mW is not a Part 15 FM power
> -- even if some people think of them as "Part 15."
> Depending on your definition these are pirate power levels,
> and thousands of times higher than needed to produce a
> maximum legal Part 15 FM field with a simple tx antenna.
>
> That, plus the 30-m minimum tx antenna height allowed means
> the answers from that web app cannot represent a true Part
> 15 FM operation.
>
> Also the figures cannot be correct if no allowance is made
> for the gain of the rx antenna or the loss of its
> transmission line -- and that is true even for systems able
> to use the powers and heights that the program will accept.
> //
>


Funny but in all these post no one mentioned anything about being pirate or whatever... We all know there are people here broadcasting with 10mw, 100mw, etc. That is not for me to decide what they do, only offering the tools that allow them the opportunity to see what results they get.

Again I did not mention that these are 'accurate' but calculated results and if you have a problem with the calculator and it's purpose and formulas, please direct them to where they belong... Those that have a problem with these results can choose to ignore them or use the data and do 'field' research to confirm the results.

Simple
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom