• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Receptor HD reception info

A

autopaint-1

Guest
IBOC Field Service Bulletin No. 02.20060216
Issued: February 16, 2006
Subject: Indoor FM HD Radio Antenna Performance
Equipment: Boston Acoustic Recepter Table Radios
Type: Anomaly
Symptom: HD Radio reception inside homes and office buildings with the new
Boston Acoustics Recepter® table model radios has been disappointing for some
listeners. In some cases, analog reception of hybrid stations has been adequate,
but the HD Radio reception has dropped in and out, or has been non-existent.
NPR Labs’ measurement of this model shows very good sensitivity at the
antenna input, which suggests that the supplied 18-inch wire antenna is a major
fault. A better indoor FM antenna is needed to improve HD Radio reception.
Recommendations: NPR Labs obtained the following samples of active
(amplified) and passive FM receive antennas for evaluation with HD Radio
signals:
• Folded dipole
• Compact amplified FM-only antenna
• Compact amplified FM/AM antenna
• Rabbit-ear FM antenna
Testing is underway and a full report will be available later this year. However,
the need for improved HD Radio reception indoors prompts NPR Labs to release
this bulletin to help guide stations and consumers in choosing antennas that are
effective in improving reception.
Preliminary testing shows a clear advantage to passive antennas, such as folded
dipole and rabbit-ear types, over low-cost active antennas. The figures below
show an example of the performance difference between a 75-ohm folded dipole
antenna and an active FM-only antenna. These figures show the spectrum
measured from 88 to 108 MHz at the NPR headquarters building in downtown
Washington DC. The antennas were placed on a large empty cardboard (nonconductive)
box approximately 5 feet from a north-facing 5th floor window. The
spectrum plots are marked with five sample stations:
WAMU 88.5 MHz Washington DC
WETA 90.9 MHz Washington DC (Arlington VA transmitter)
WBJC 91.5 MHz Baltimore MD
WASH 97.1 MHz Washington DC
WTOP 103.5 MHz Washington DC.
The spectrum of the folded dipole shows most FM station signals ranging
between -30 dBm and -50 dBm (measured with a 50-ohm spectrum analyzer
input). WBJC, a Baltimore station, is shown at approximately -69 dBm. The
noise floor, which is a combination of analyzer internal noise and low-level FM
signals is below -90 dBm.
The gain control of the active FM-only antenna was adjusted so that the level of
FM signals near the middle of the band were approximately equal to the levels
measured with the folded dipole; this occurred at a rotation about 1/3 clockwise
from minimum. It is apparent that gain of the antenna unit is not flat across the
band; the Reserved Band (88-92 MHz) stations are at least 10 dB lower with the
active antenna. The WTOP signal is approximately 20 dB higher than it was with
the folded dipole. However, this signal increase is accompanied by a noise floor
increase of nearly 30 dB so the net signal-to-noise ratio is decreased by
approximately 10 dB. The signal-to-noise ratio for the Reserved Band stations is
even worse (note that weak WBJC is almost lost in the noise). This performance
was typical of other amplified antennas tested that sell for under $70.
The source of noise in amplified FM antennas is likely to be 3rd order and 5th
order intermodulation products generated by the internal amplifier. Adjustment of
the gain control lower will reduce the IM product levels, but also reduces the
signal levels below that of the sample dipole antenna.
Suggestions of passive antennas that were found to perform well are:
• C. Crane “FM Reflect Antenna”, $24.95 (www.shop.npr.org)
• Radio Shack “Budget TV Antenna Model 15-1874”, $9.99
(www.radioshack.com)
Folded Dipole Antenna Active FM-Only Antenna
NPR Labs will provide updates to this field service bulletin as field information
warrants.
Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning this NPR
Labs FSB. Refer to Field Service Bulletin No. 02
Radio Shack Budget
TV Antenna Model
CCrane FM Reflect
Antenna
 
If they are actually recommending one of these indoor amplified antennas, it must mean that their RF transistor is mediocre at best. The input transistors of the classic tuners of the 70's generally have such low noise first RF transistors that any attempt to amplify the signal in one of those units results in more noise and worse reception than just hooking a passive antenna straight through.

The ONLY indoor antenna (besides a dipole) that I have seen that offers any gain at all without adding noise is made by a company called "Godar". It is a compact log-periodic in a flat housing that has little gain relative to a dipole, but its directionality offers a degree of ghost reflection.

A good test of your radio's RF input transistor is to find a completely empty frequency (nothing but static), and DISCONNECT the antenna. If noise goes down - then you have a very quiet front end in your tuner, one that isn't generating as much self-noise as other units. It means that your tuner, connected to an antenna, is picking up natural noise such as Jupiter lightning strikes instead of transistor noise inside the unit. VERY FEW tuners can do this! When you have one, it will be a hot DX unit! But several tuners can be improved by changing the IF to 150 or even 110 kHz ceramic filters. A lot of tuner self noise comes from those broad 280 kHz ceramic filters most manufacturers use. And IBOC tuners need even broader filters to cover all those sidebands on adjacent frequencies. This will mean even more noise - and less effective sensitivity - on analog signal.

Franky - I have my doubts about claims of low noise on IBOC. Although an all "digital" signal chain would only have sampling noise - they reduce the sampling rate to accomodate HD2 channels, somewhat negating the digital advantage. And make no mistake - these HD2 channels will become another source of advertising revenue once broacasters have people hooked! And also - make no mistake - when analog blend occurs in the fringes, the HD2 channel will blend to the stations primary format! Abrupt song change - and that may be distracting to drivers. Much more so than a gentle fade out of an analog station.
 
> broacasters have people hooked! And also - make no mistake
> - when analog blend occurs in the fringes, the HD2 channel
> will blend to the stations primary format! Abrupt song
> change - and that may be distracting to drivers. Much more
> so than a gentle fade out of an analog station.
>

This is not correct. When HD is lost on the HD1 channel, it falls back to the analog channel. When HD2 is lost, it is simply lost.
 
> If they are actually recommending one of these indoor
> amplified antennas, it must mean that their RF transistor is
> mediocre at best.

I have never reccommended a amplified antenna. I use a passive loop with a tuning capacitor and with that arrangement the receptor has received stations I've never heard at this QTH before. As an example I heard WEUP (pre-sunrise) from Alabama on 1700 this morning. I have never heard Alabama on the broadcast band before with any other radio I have used and I have confirmed KFI and many Europeans in the past.

> A good test of your radio's RF input transistor is to find a
> completely empty frequency (nothing but static), and
> DISCONNECT the antenna.

There is no such thing in the NYC area.


Did you listen to the demo I provided in another thread?
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom