I have so many thoughts & opinions that I could express right now but you know what? I have so much lumber in both of my eyes that I could build an entire subdivision with it. So I'll be quiet now.
MightyFrenchman said:I have so much lumber in both of my eyes that I could build an entire subdivision with it. So I'll be quiet now.
Goat Rodeo Cowboy said:We have indeed brought up some concepts that are hard to discuss because we become so emotionally attached to some of them. On a day when you feel up to writing about them, we look forward to reading your observations.
A couple of messages back, someone stated that maybe secular ownership was better the church ownership of a station playing CCM. After thinking through that one, I think I agree with the end result, but I may get there with different logic.
Churches tend to have a perceived need to be very "turf protective". Churches announce a statement of faith, put a "What we believe" page on their website and then need live by those statements and documents. A bigger issue than whether the music is rock or not becomes the theological message of the words of the songs. I don't know that the average radio listener who is the target of the evangelism element of CCM broadcasting categorizes doctrine but pastors, elders and deacons get all "wound around the axle" very quickly. "I don't want to hear that song again because the words make it sound like our doctrine is....... (fill in the controversy of your choice)...." A corporation set up to operate a radio station broadcasting "a wide spectrum of Christian expression" can choose to look upon doctrinal disagreements as minor and can choose to ignore them. (That can be a good thing, that can be a bad thing.)
CCM music when analyzed for it's doctrinal content seems to cover a rather ecumenical range of expression. There are a lot of church boards that cannot reconcile themselves to be part a function that projects a "range of expression". Individual people who chose to own a radio station can do that if they wish. Just be prepared for an occasional long phone conversation with a disgruntled listener.
Wow,there seems to be a very liberal anti-Christian bias among a large number of people who work in radiogr8oldies said:Wow, i guess that would mean I'm not a "real Christian" if I work for a secular-formatted station or have a secular job or career at all. I guess everyone has to be a full-time pastor. And sorry, I've known liberal Christians who are walking cloiser than screaming fundamentalist Bible thumpers. What's a "Bible believer" anyway, when so many competing groups claim to "believe every word exactly as written". Did God really say "OK, it's all written down, I'm going on vacation, if I ever have anything else to say to humanity it will only be to quote myself.". Is God really contained in that book?
To the radio topic, Radio One owns several black Gospel stations. Susquehanna once owned a station called "The Song" which one of our posters constantly complained about.
gr8oldies said:Wow, i guess that would mean I'm not a "real Christian" if I work for a secular-formatted station or have a secular job or career at all. I guess everyone has to be a full-time pastor. And sorry, I've known liberal Christians who are walking cloiser than screaming fundamentalist Bible thumpers. What's a "Bible believer" anyway, when so many competing groups claim to "believe every word exactly as written". Did God really say "OK, it's all written down, I'm going on vacation, if I ever have anything else to say to humanity it will only be to quote myself.". Is God really contained in that book?
To the radio topic, Radio One owns several black Gospel stations. Susquehanna once owned a station called "The Song" which one of our posters constantly complained about.