Talk_Dude said:Exactically! Now you're getting it! A company that provides national program content that's carried on multiple stations across the country is called (drum roll please) a network. Granted, it might only be network programming 6:00 AM to midnight, or there might be breaks built into drive time for local drop-ins like weather and traffic reports. But what everyone has been describing is pretty much a throwback to the olden days.
It's what I've been saying all along! I got it from the beginning. But very few radio stations have ever carried 24 hours of network programming that I'm aware of. Even in the olden days, most of the stations only carried network programming for a portion of the day. Plus, in the era you're talking about, the programming was MUCH different. It was much more like TV programming. Radio was program driven. Now we're basically just talking about voice talent between songs, so no, I don't think it's very much like the olden days.
Talk_Dude said:And, if you think about this a bit, there are probably more stations than there are possible networks. Once a city has one network station for each of the main formats and they dominate those formats, then the remaining stations will be forced to compete by counter programming what the networks cannot provide, which is ultra-local content. If all of the "wall-to-wall songs with a DJ reading a liner-card every three songs" formats are on national networks, the stations who can't get a network affiliation will have to counter with something different, not just the same things done by some guy sitting in a local building.
I also thought I pretty clearly stated that this was my opinion as well. I think there will always be a small handful of locally owned and operated stations that are successful. But I think more in the information arena as opposed to music. But I also think you might see some stations focus solely on local music, as I stated above.
Talk_Dude said:That could translate to more career opportunities for local radio talent, not less. It would put the people who can't do anything other than read liner card reads out of work, but it could give people with the talent to actually entertain audiences over the radio more opportunities than ever before.
I disagree with this point. The reason radio stations are cutting talent is because it doesn't make economic sense to be paying for a warm body behind the microphone. We're talking about talent making barely above minimum wage getting cut to save money. I don't see any realistic way that these changes are going to create more jobs.
I have a feeling you could see more and more individuals offer to be on the air free in exchange for using radio as a forum to spread their message.