E
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
D
dm101066
Guest
> Don't shoot the messenger, but this is where I saw it first:
>
>
> http://www.lisawood.blogspot.com
>
Are you trying to tell me that Mr. Richards didn't stumble across at least one aircheck that was better than this idiot?
>
>
> http://www.lisawood.blogspot.com
>
Are you trying to tell me that Mr. Richards didn't stumble across at least one aircheck that was better than this idiot?
O
OttoM
Guest
> Are you trying to tell me that Mr. Richards didn't stumble
> across at least one aircheck that was better than this
> idiot?
>
Or maybe anyone with talent knows they don't want to work for Sgt. Hairclub.
> across at least one aircheck that was better than this
> idiot?
>
Or maybe anyone with talent knows they don't want to work for Sgt. Hairclub.
I caught Ricker today. Anyone else notice he's lost some of that "cooooool dude" affectation in his voice?
Maybe by being more real he'll make a more genuine connection with the audience. For that demo and format I think he's a slam dunk.
Maybe by being more real he'll make a more genuine connection with the audience. For that demo and format I think he's a slam dunk.
E
eastsidah
Guest
> I caught Ricker today. Anyone else notice he's lost some of
> that "cooooool dude" affectation in his voice?
>
> Maybe by being more real he'll make a more genuine
> connection with the audience. For that demo and format I
> think he's a slam dunk.
>
Maybe they just sent him back to "DJ School" and this whole thing was a farse?
> that "cooooool dude" affectation in his voice?
>
> Maybe by being more real he'll make a more genuine
> connection with the audience. For that demo and format I
> think he's a slam dunk.
>
Maybe they just sent him back to "DJ School" and this whole thing was a farse?
Stoners For Stoner Radio
> > Are you trying to tell me that Mr. Richards didn't stumble
>
> > across at least one aircheck that was better than this
> > idiot?
> >
>
> Or maybe anyone with talent knows they don't want to work
> for Sgt. Hairclub.
OR....(rolling virtual strawberry blunt of Sweet Mama Sativa, firing it up and taking first toke)
The Northwest stoner community has been pretty vocal about Ricker's absence. In fact, somebody was wearing a "Bring Back Ricker" T-Shirt down at Hempfest. KISW has big accounts with AM/PM and restaurants, places you'll find stoners. And they know it. They could lose those BIG accounts without a solid stoner audience.
Marijuana smokers are an important radio demographic force to be reckoned with-and served. And KISW management now finally knows what Vancouver stations from CFOX to CHQM have known. Besides, it's harvest time and there's lots of fine bud out there everywhere in every strain. And Ricker is back too.
Coincidence?
(Passing virtual joint down to next poster of this thread...)
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Horse Sense: What a horse has that keeps it from betting on people.
[email protected]
</P>
> > Are you trying to tell me that Mr. Richards didn't stumble
>
> > across at least one aircheck that was better than this
> > idiot?
> >
>
> Or maybe anyone with talent knows they don't want to work
> for Sgt. Hairclub.
OR....(rolling virtual strawberry blunt of Sweet Mama Sativa, firing it up and taking first toke)
The Northwest stoner community has been pretty vocal about Ricker's absence. In fact, somebody was wearing a "Bring Back Ricker" T-Shirt down at Hempfest. KISW has big accounts with AM/PM and restaurants, places you'll find stoners. And they know it. They could lose those BIG accounts without a solid stoner audience.
Marijuana smokers are an important radio demographic force to be reckoned with-and served. And KISW management now finally knows what Vancouver stations from CFOX to CHQM have known. Besides, it's harvest time and there's lots of fine bud out there everywhere in every strain. And Ricker is back too.
Coincidence?
(Passing virtual joint down to next poster of this thread...)
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Horse Sense: What a horse has that keeps it from betting on people.
[email protected]
</P>
I
InEar
Guest
P-I says =
KISW's new 2-7 pm host is Ricker
99.9 says it brought Ricker back because of listener demand.
Program director Dave Richards said he got an e-mail as recently as
20 minutes before the unannounced return, asking what happened to Ricker.
"They've not ever stopped," he says.
Richards declined to say why KISW and Ricker,
who joined the station in 2002, parted company in June.
"We're just celebrating the fact he's back," he said.
KISW's new 2-7 pm host is Ricker
99.9 says it brought Ricker back because of listener demand.
Program director Dave Richards said he got an e-mail as recently as
20 minutes before the unannounced return, asking what happened to Ricker.
"They've not ever stopped," he says.
Richards declined to say why KISW and Ricker,
who joined the station in 2002, parted company in June.
"We're just celebrating the fact he's back," he said.
Re: Stoners For Stoner Radio
ALOT ALOT more people than just stoners listen to Ricker. Nice argument though, it almost convinced me for a split second that you knew what you were talking about.
> > > Are you trying to tell me that Mr. Richards didn't
> stumble
> >
> > > across at least one aircheck that was better than this
> > > idiot?
> > >
> >
> > Or maybe anyone with talent knows they don't want to work
> > for Sgt. Hairclub.
>
> OR....(rolling virtual strawberry blunt of Sweet Mama
> Sativa, firing it up and taking first toke)
>
> The Northwest stoner community has been pretty vocal about
> Ricker's absence. In fact, somebody was wearing a "Bring
> Back Ricker" T-Shirt down at Hempfest. KISW has big accounts
> with AM/PM and restaurants, places you'll find stoners. And
> they know it. They could lose those BIG accounts without a
> solid stoner audience.
>
> Marijuana smokers are an important radio demographic force
> to be reckoned with-and served. And KISW management now
> finally knows what Vancouver stations from CFOX to CHQM have
> known. Besides, it's harvest time and there's lots of fine
> bud out there everywhere in every strain. And Ricker is back
> too.
>
> Coincidence?
>
> (Passing virtual joint down to next poster of this
> thread...)
>
>
> >
>
ALOT ALOT more people than just stoners listen to Ricker. Nice argument though, it almost convinced me for a split second that you knew what you were talking about.
> > > Are you trying to tell me that Mr. Richards didn't
> stumble
> >
> > > across at least one aircheck that was better than this
> > > idiot?
> > >
> >
> > Or maybe anyone with talent knows they don't want to work
> > for Sgt. Hairclub.
>
> OR....(rolling virtual strawberry blunt of Sweet Mama
> Sativa, firing it up and taking first toke)
>
> The Northwest stoner community has been pretty vocal about
> Ricker's absence. In fact, somebody was wearing a "Bring
> Back Ricker" T-Shirt down at Hempfest. KISW has big accounts
> with AM/PM and restaurants, places you'll find stoners. And
> they know it. They could lose those BIG accounts without a
> solid stoner audience.
>
> Marijuana smokers are an important radio demographic force
> to be reckoned with-and served. And KISW management now
> finally knows what Vancouver stations from CFOX to CHQM have
> known. Besides, it's harvest time and there's lots of fine
> bud out there everywhere in every strain. And Ricker is back
> too.
>
> Coincidence?
>
> (Passing virtual joint down to next poster of this
> thread...)
>
>
> >
>
Re: Stoners For Stoner Radio
> ALOT ALOT more people than just stoners listen to Ricker.
> Nice argument though, it almost convinced me for a split
> second that you knew what you were talking about.
Hey! When it comes to stoners, NOBODY knows more than Larry!<P ID="signature">______________
What would Jesus think if I sang out of tune?</P>
> ALOT ALOT more people than just stoners listen to Ricker.
> Nice argument though, it almost convinced me for a split
> second that you knew what you were talking about.
Hey! When it comes to stoners, NOBODY knows more than Larry!<P ID="signature">______________
What would Jesus think if I sang out of tune?</P>
Re: Stoners For Stoner Radio
> > ALOT ALOT more people than just stoners listen to Ricker.
>
> > Nice argument though, it almost convinced me for a split
> > second that you knew what you were talking about.
>
> Hey! When it comes to stoners, NOBODY knows more than
> Larry!
Damn right.
Hang in there. It's Friday and 4:20's comin'.....
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Horse Sense: What a horse has that keeps it from betting on people.
[email protected]
</P>
> > ALOT ALOT more people than just stoners listen to Ricker.
>
> > Nice argument though, it almost convinced me for a split
> > second that you knew what you were talking about.
>
> Hey! When it comes to stoners, NOBODY knows more than
> Larry!
Damn right.
Hang in there. It's Friday and 4:20's comin'.....
>
<P ID="signature">______________
Horse Sense: What a horse has that keeps it from betting on people.
[email protected]
</P>
- Status
- This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.