They've tried cutting their way to prosperity before. Cutting people who create the reason to listen means lower ratings. Lower ratings mean less revenue. The revenue decreases more than the operating costs do, which mean less profit. Yeah, they'll get a temporary boost to their stock price from people who don't know the business or who haven't noticed their past performance. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of iHeartMedia's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at only $149.85 today.
It will take a while for shareholders to catch on. They've made several moves during the latest cost-cutting wave. They're switching to Audiograph with promises that you can target an audience more precisely, most likely based on online listening. They're pushing people toward their app and away from towers and transmitters. Maybe they're ahead of the curve on that. Maybe they're not as people are becoming more resistant to giving up their data. If you're going to listen on an app, why listen to iHeart? There are plenty of other sources with a lot fewer commercials.
They're cutting salespeople out of the loop by offering advertising through Amazon's ad buying platform. It's allased on numbers like all other digital advertising. It's very hard to measure how effective those numbers really are, and there's very little human interaction to establish relationships and guide ad buys.
Short term, Pittman and a handful at the top get to keep their cushy jobs. Long term, their properties get even more robotic, and they get an excuse to lean even more heavily on AI, perfecting their goal of saying nothing meaningful to local audiences. With luck, they can reduce their content to a dozen streaming formats and employ bots to create locally-targeted advertising to those who find AI slop appealing.