jabba17 said:
I for one cannot figure out the AAA fetish among programmers. Does AAA really draw that many people nationally? I mean, Dave has had one of the lowest ratings, book in and book out, of a 100k station in ATL. Now we have another station on 1/10th the signal aping it. Does it bill well or something? Or do people think it's respectable because it's adult (not kiddie, and can piggyback on AC's traditional high ratings and billing) album (and therefore chockfull of critically-acclaimed, cognoscenti rock) alternative (and therefore hip)?
IMNSHO AAA is an absolute poseur when it comes to innovative formats and playlists. At least AC doesn't pretend to be.
LOL - great post Jabba!
Labels can be trouble -especially with insiders, whatever the business. Every arm chair and/or employed PD has a different expectation and listeners could give a crap.
Almost 20% of terrestrial radio's cume is listening to online stations. Music discovery, personalization and lack of clutter are three of the draws.
Features like iTunes Genius and Apps like Pandora make depth tracks and new artist much more accessible (and cool).
As to AAA: Dave's inconsistencies have more to do with content/personality/music miss matching. Ex: 10+ morning shows and stereotypical jocks mucking up
a pretty solid music image. B98 and Hit AC formats in general may be perceived as shallow to an insider but they're consistent, safe and dependable from a listener perspective.
Rock 100 and TRG aren't moving the needle. They have to try something. And I wouldn't be surprised if The River ran it's course - ahem dried up - in the next 12-18 months.
News/Talk will probably migrate to FM at some point too.