interesting read the whole article is linked below
Rogers stated that, since it had not yet concluded negotiations with either Sirius Canada or CSR, it could not indicate the terms and conditions it would seek for the distribution of the SSR services, or specify how it would price and package them. In addition, Rogers submitted that it could not accurately assess the impact that approval of its application would have on Galaxie and Max Trax without knowing the terms under which it and other BDUs would distribute the SSR services.
Rogers stated that, given the discretionary nature of the pay audio services, it could not make a commitment to continue distribution of Galaxie and Max Trax, either on their own or packaged with other audio services, as a pre-condition of approval of its present application, or as a condition of licence should its application be approved. Rogers opposed any packaging requirements for audio services, claiming that its subscribers would perceive such requirements as taking away their ability to choose.
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/db2006-650.htm
Rogers stated that, since it had not yet concluded negotiations with either Sirius Canada or CSR, it could not indicate the terms and conditions it would seek for the distribution of the SSR services, or specify how it would price and package them. In addition, Rogers submitted that it could not accurately assess the impact that approval of its application would have on Galaxie and Max Trax without knowing the terms under which it and other BDUs would distribute the SSR services.
Rogers stated that, given the discretionary nature of the pay audio services, it could not make a commitment to continue distribution of Galaxie and Max Trax, either on their own or packaged with other audio services, as a pre-condition of approval of its present application, or as a condition of licence should its application be approved. Rogers opposed any packaging requirements for audio services, claiming that its subscribers would perceive such requirements as taking away their ability to choose.
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Decisions/2006/db2006-650.htm