HIs Las Vegas signals were off the air for the past week we were in Las Vegas for NAB.Ya think Crazy Ed is running those "Save Ancient Modulation" promos on KBET 7~Ninety in Vegas?
HIs Las Vegas signals were off the air for the past week we were in Las Vegas for NAB.Ya think Crazy Ed is running those "Save Ancient Modulation" promos on KBET 7~Ninety in Vegas?
"Silent" and "Ed" can't be used in the same sentence.Hope someone filed a silent notification....
Or Ed knows deep down he is hosed, and he's trying to destroy his own assets, like a homeowner in foreclosure sometimes does.It seems like Ed doesn’t care. If a station goes silent, it’s going to lose all its listeners. It’ll be tough to get them back.
If that is true, judge isn't going to like that (even though as I understand it, these stations are separate from the court case).Or Ed knows deep down he is hosed, and he's trying to destroy his own assets, like a homeowner in foreclosure sometimes does.
This is scorched earth policy. If I can't have it, no one can. Besides, when has Ed ever worried about what the FCC or a judge tells him to do anyway?Or Ed knows deep down he is hosed, and he's trying to destroy his own assets, like a homeowner in foreclosure sometimes does.
The Commission, rightfully, has been deferring to the courts in this case. It's likely that, once there's been some kind of disposition, the FCC will accommodate the result. Possibly it will try to fine Stolz for various compliance violations, in which case, good luck collecting. The Commission might also admonish the new owners, have short-term renewals, etc. but it would be reasonable to argue that new owners inherited the problems and, with some promises of better compliance or just simply not being a pain in the [donkey], that argument is likely to succeed.
Not necessarily true. If precedent is to be believed (the license revocation of WMJX/Miami in the 80’s), you buy the license…warts and all!What could the admonish new owners for who havent committed any sins?
Nothing. They cant really admonish a new owner for something the previous owner did
Exactly right. Encumbrances are to the license. A new owner can make an argument to the Commission that this was a fault of the previous license, and they (the new licensee) will do better, etc. etc. Commission staff, ever mindful of the possibility of judicial review, is likely to take such extenuating circumstances into account. As a consequence, potential fines are reduced or even waived, with, at most, an admonishment (i.e. a stern warning not to do what the old licensee did) with no actual penalty.Not necessarily true. If precedent is to be believed (the license revocation of WMJX/Miami in the 80’s), you buy the license…warts and all!
The only difference is this is not based on a station’s lack of compliance. So it’ll be hard to justify sanctions against an individual licensed station with new owners
Yup. Can confirm this!Very weird thing at 92.7 this morning - mostly dead air except for one-to-two-second bursts of the dance feed, still from Albuquerque, I presume. Either there's equipment failure or there's more to the story.
It's been dead air altogether starting in the 2 pm hour - still on the air, just silent carrier. I'll have to listen to my recordings to determine when the last gasp of life occurred.Yup. Can confirm this!
I don't recall ever hearing any. I'll admit that I've listened to it lately only to see when the plug gets pulled. Morbid, I know. In any event, I think it's fair to say that it's a placeholder.Have there been any commercials on “Pirate Radio” heard yet? I’m curious if it’s actually making money or a placeholder format.