One day last week there was a small story in the newspaper that hit me like a baseball bat. I am very aware of the change, but I had not quantified it.
Only 18% of our American population is now living in "rural" areas.
There are a lot of threads posted in R-I in which we discuss all the factors that have change the radio business. There are a lot of threads where everyone is sure that if we would just go back and run radio stations liked with did in _____ (pick your era of choice) then radio would be great, would be exciting, would be more successful than it is today. And the usual response is: 1. Ain't gonna happen. 2. Can't happen.
There are a lot of other valid reasons why radio has changed and why radio will not ever be 1958 again!
Here are my random thoughts on why the shift from our nation being may 50% rural and 50% urban a few decades back shaped radio in a way that we cannon ever duplicate when we are down to 18% rural population.
In a sense, we all had a little bit of Gomer Pyle in us back then, It wasn't too hard to put something on the radio that cause people living in rural areas where they didn't have access to things urban people enjoyed to say: (shape your mouth like Gomer as you say
GAHH-lee!
Little town merchants were much more important to brand name merchandise so there was a fleet of sales people out encouraging small town merchants to sell, sell, sell, and they often brought sample radio commercials along and suggested the use of radio. (We also know they tended to more often suggest the use of home town newspaper.)
If half the people used to live in rural areas, then half the people only had a handful of stations to choose from. They tended to be more tolerant of what they expected and what they would accept from a radio station. City dwellers have oodles of stations to choose from and are likely to be more demanding, more picky.
I'm looking for more examples of how the shift from a 50% rural / 50% urban America to today's 18% rural / 82% urban America affects the business of radio.
Only 18% of our American population is now living in "rural" areas.
There are a lot of threads posted in R-I in which we discuss all the factors that have change the radio business. There are a lot of threads where everyone is sure that if we would just go back and run radio stations liked with did in _____ (pick your era of choice) then radio would be great, would be exciting, would be more successful than it is today. And the usual response is: 1. Ain't gonna happen. 2. Can't happen.
There are a lot of other valid reasons why radio has changed and why radio will not ever be 1958 again!
Here are my random thoughts on why the shift from our nation being may 50% rural and 50% urban a few decades back shaped radio in a way that we cannon ever duplicate when we are down to 18% rural population.
In a sense, we all had a little bit of Gomer Pyle in us back then, It wasn't too hard to put something on the radio that cause people living in rural areas where they didn't have access to things urban people enjoyed to say: (shape your mouth like Gomer as you say
Little town merchants were much more important to brand name merchandise so there was a fleet of sales people out encouraging small town merchants to sell, sell, sell, and they often brought sample radio commercials along and suggested the use of radio. (We also know they tended to more often suggest the use of home town newspaper.)
If half the people used to live in rural areas, then half the people only had a handful of stations to choose from. They tended to be more tolerant of what they expected and what they would accept from a radio station. City dwellers have oodles of stations to choose from and are likely to be more demanding, more picky.
I'm looking for more examples of how the shift from a 50% rural / 50% urban America to today's 18% rural / 82% urban America affects the business of radio.