ajc_trw said:
denverradiodude said:
Yea, I can see the confusion between Indianapolis and India.
You didn't read my follow-up post.
Just saw your followup (Daily Kos) with the photo showing
May 6, 2012
Most Popular Week
New Delhi, Delhi, India
Most Popular City
Total likes
72,873
While on actual facebook
May 6, 2012
Most Popular Week
Indianapolis, IN
Most Popular City
Total likes
72,952
so it only took 79 likes to put Indianapolis on top. Also, why is the Kos site's photo different from than facebook's WRT page format?
Sorry, who's faking what?
BTW: New Delhi, India has a page while New Delhi, Dehli, India doesn't.
You're creating a false argument, buttressed by a vague and unsupported allegation.
That's not to say there isn't an issue with the original assumptions about "LIKE"s.
Check it now, you'll see this:
Page Insights
May 6, 2012
Most Popular Week
Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Most Popular City
45-54 years old
Most Popular Age Group
http://www.facebook.com/RushBabesforAmerica/likes
Or maybe something different.
The Facebook page appears to explain what is happening, IF you move your mouse over the question mark.
Your claim that,
why is the Kos site's photo different from than facebook's WRT page format?
appears to me to be mere obfuscation, apparently for the purpose of reversing the responsibility here.
Why New Delhi? Why Mumbai, Maharashtra, India? That remains unexplained.
But here's a curious circumstance: if we in the United States talk about "Rush Babes For America" ON FACEBOOK, then the city signified in "LIKE"s is likely to revert to the USA. It is simply a measure of who has been talking about "Rush Babes For America" ON FACEBOOK in the past few days.
That means Young Turks, and others, haven't nailed down the precise connection between "Rush Babes For America" and Rush Limbaugh (yet). Theories?