secondchoice said:
*I have seen the statistics that a large percentage of radio stations were losing money before consolidation. I have always questioned that number. Were the loses because stations were not billing enough to pay the help,electric bill tower rent day to day expenses, or where they a result of speculators paying too much for properties.
There are some "subcultures" within the world of radio broadcasting. Some stations are "publicly held" (you can go to your stock broker and buy a handful of their shares.). Some stations are "closely held" (substantial corporation, but limited number of share-holders and their stock is not available to you in all probability).
And then there is the wonderful, wacky world of "privately held", the family owned stations, the truly ground-level entrepreneurs of the world.
When I read articles about how many stations lose money, I want to know who/what the source of that information is. When they say Umpteen per cent of all radio stations are losing money, I want to know how many stations billing 8, 10 or 23 million dollars per year are in that report, and how many stations billing less than $144,000 per year are in that report.
And then I want to know how many of the money losing stations hold title to the entrepreneur's airplane, sailboat or other exotic item that the Federal regulators won't let his nursing home own and deduct from his taxes.
When we start talking about who makes money and who loses money in broadcasting, it can be a very mysterious conversation.
And if your third oldest son has been a life-long screw-up, it's cheaper to buy him a radio station for a toy than to let him have an office next to his older brother down at the heating and air-conditioning business and screw up the family cash-cow.
Now don't get me wrong. I'm not really a cynical person...... but.....