all of those ARE the reasons given for re-cycling the same people in a market, i would take it another step and call it what it is- LACK OF IMAGINATION from management, and with that you get the kind of STALE RADIO it has become, in this case in Indianapolis. and isn't it quite telling that just ONE name came up as maybe comming from outside of Indianapolis, then there were a few "trackers" from outside the state(which shouldn't count at all).Dingy Harry said:I am sorry that you haven't been get back to the market. The "recycling" of players is definitely not limited to Indianapolis or programming. It is the "devil you know is better than the devil you don't" syndrome. There is a lot of it in sales as well. People hire people with whom they are comfortable. People are often more comfortable with people they know. Some of it comes down to $$ as well. There are no moving expenses involved in hiring someone local. Also the unemployed are more likely to work for less money. Sad, but true.
cspotrun said:as far as Non-Competes..IF Indiana is a "Right To Work" state like the one i'm in... they won't stand up...
N_D_Radioguy said:cspotrun said:as far as Non-Competes..IF Indiana is a "Right To Work" state like the one i'm in... they won't stand up...
Indiana is not a Right to Work state. Right to Work has to do with unions and closed or open shops. It is, however, and At-Will Employment state, which is what you probably meant. The nature of being a contractor versus an employee makes the legal water murky at best. I have never heard of any legal challenges to them here; they are honored more as a "gentlemen's agreement" than anything else.
Hey Marvelous Mark: In the mid 70, you made a statement on WNDE that the management felt was in very poor taste. I've always wondered what that statement was...or was it all a stunt? Thanks for some great radio back in the day...marklarsen said:Merry Christmas,
"Marvelous" Mark Larsen, Tampa Bay 1980-Now
WIFE 1972-74
WERK 1974-76
WNDE 1976-77
RDO said:Shadeland is moving downtown. I wouldn't be surprised if there have been more and will be more of the same changes. Be weary of any job ads for Emmis. They are mostly EOE ads. I'm sure they have people already selected for those jobs.
11south said:N_D_Radioguy said:cspotrun said:as far as Non-Competes..IF Indiana is a "Right To Work" state like the one i'm in... they won't stand up...
Indiana is not a Right to Work state. Right to Work has to do with unions and closed or open shops. It is, however, and At-Will Employment state, which is what you probably meant. The nature of being a contractor versus an employee makes the legal water murky at best. I have never heard of any legal challenges to them here; they are honored more as a "gentlemen's agreement" than anything else.
Are they enforceable?
Generally speaking, yes. Courts once did not enforce non competition agreements, viewing them as unlawful restraints on trade. Today, however, courts will enforce non-competition agreements if:
the employer proves that it has a legitimate business interest to protect by restricting its employees' right to compete against it;
the restriction on the employee's right to compete is no greater than that necessary to protect the employer's business interest; and
the covenant not to compete is supported by consideration, meaning that the employee received something in exchange for it.
Every case turns on its own facts. Judges who enforce a non-competition agreement must balance the protection of the employer's business interest against the employee's right to earn a living, as well as other factors, such as whether the restrictions will harm the public.
Read more here:
http://www.myemploymentlawyer.com/n...t after I started my employment. Is it valid?