jeffryan said:
DanStrassberg said:
Well, I've accomplished SOMETHING! I've finally gotten you to say succinctly that you have to have WIRELESS Internet--
Yes, and I only had to say it about a dozen times.
Why did it take this long to get through your YOUR thick skull?
Is this behavior necessary?
Wow, I just read through this whole thread. Man, talk about a lot of symantecs here when discussing the technology involved.
In Dan's defense, wi-fi is not wireless Internet. That seems to be his point through the entire thread, and he is correct. Wi-fi is a "trade" term for the technologies that make up the 802.11x standards of wireless networks. So technically it is not wireless Internet. Technically, there is also no wired Internet. The Internet is just a public network of computers with a specific set of protocols for communication- there is no technical requirement on what medium is used to connect the computers, just the protocols involved.
See where I'm going with this Dan?
So let's be clear, so that all can understand, including Dan. This device connects to 802.11b/g/n networks that have been connected to the Internet. In most cases, this network has been created by a DSL or Cable subscriber who has plugged their combination wireless access point/router into their external DSL or Cable modem. The device can connect to unencrypted networks, along with those encrypted with WEP and WPA security protocols. You might also be able to connect this device if you live near a "hot spot", and someone else is providing the wireless network in your area. There would probably be some difficulty connecting to some enterprise level wireless networks, such as those that use a Radius type authentication server where a username and password is required, or, those that rely a user connecting to a web page first with a username/password before they receive full access to the wireless network.
There other types of wireless networks out there. Wi-max is a newer technology that works at ~2.5 GHz (in the USA) that could become what many would call "Wireless Internet". EDGE, UMTS, and EV-DO are digital mobile phone networks that are also being used to provide Internet access to mobile phones, smartphones, and computers/laptops that are equipped with the appropriate hardware receivers (as well as a service contract with a provider). "Bluetooth" is the trade name for a specific type of wireless personal area network, which allows you to interconnect devices at short distances. Even Bluetooth can be used to connect to the Internet (ie, pairing a cell phone to a laptop using Bluetooth to access the phones Internet connection). This device would not connect to any of these networks in its current incarnation.
So Dan, please lets quit it with the technicalities OK. We all know you're a smart engineer. But we're talking about an 802.11x enabled device, that does have options for security.
As for the device itself, I wish I had the money to pick one of these up. I could think of a few places where this would be nicer than a computer for tuning in to some out-of-town stations. However, I really don't think this type of device will be the death knell for radio. What will kill radio will be the iPhone 4G (yes, not 3G), and other similar smartphones. When you can load up your "Live365" or Shoutcast radio player on your phone, consistently receive a 1mbps connection, and then plug this device into your car stereo, well yeah, that will be the beginning of the end for terrestrial radio as we know it.
I can't wait.