-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
K
KMRichards
Guest
> > There already is a new radio forum for San Diego in the
> > works!
> >
> > Stay Tuned
> >
>
> Well let us know when it's up and running!
Actually, a post promoting a competing discussion board is a violation of R-I rules, and would be summarily deleted as well.
But you knew I'd say that.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> > works!
> >
> > Stay Tuned
> >
>
> Well let us know when it's up and running!
Actually, a post promoting a competing discussion board is a violation of R-I rules, and would be summarily deleted as well.
But you knew I'd say that.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> Actually, a post promoting a competing discussion board is a
> violation of R-I rules, and would be summarily deleted as
> well.
OK, that's just silly. Why would such a rule exist? You already have links to all kinds of radio related websites, and many of them have forums. What competition? You guys making money out of where people post? The board isn't going to the dogs, but the operators are starting to sound like they are running a cult. Don't drink the kool-aid!
> violation of R-I rules, and would be summarily deleted as
> well.
OK, that's just silly. Why would such a rule exist? You already have links to all kinds of radio related websites, and many of them have forums. What competition? You guys making money out of where people post? The board isn't going to the dogs, but the operators are starting to sound like they are running a cult. Don't drink the kool-aid!
K
KMRichards
Guest
That is an easy question to answer, actually.
> OK, that's just silly. Why would such a rule exist? You
> already have links to all kinds of radio related websites,
> and many of them have forums.
Asking us to provide a link is different from posting what amounts to an ad for a board in the discussion area.
The first is working with the management, the second is considered spam.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> OK, that's just silly. Why would such a rule exist? You
> already have links to all kinds of radio related websites,
> and many of them have forums.
Asking us to provide a link is different from posting what amounts to an ad for a board in the discussion area.
The first is working with the management, the second is considered spam.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
R
Rocco
Guest
Re: That is an easy question to answer, actually.
What a bunch of twisted rationale, hypocritical horseshit.
By the way, I made sure I didn't violate "Rule 5". I'm not attacking you, I'm questioning your concept.
What a bunch of twisted rationale, hypocritical horseshit.
By the way, I made sure I didn't violate "Rule 5". I'm not attacking you, I'm questioning your concept.
I
ibezdechi
Guest
With the untimely death of one of the owners Radio-Info.com will probably go by the wayside anyway, especially with the autocratic attitudes which is putting a real "chilling effect" on the dialogue which it is supposed to be promoting.
> > There already is a new radio forum for San Diego in the
> > works!
>
> If it's privately owned, hire good lawyers.
>
> If it's on one of those "forums for hire" sites, check the
> terms and conditions. They likely have a clause that could
> be interpreted as the right to make the forum disappear the
> instant Arbitron's attorneys even hint at legal action.
>
> You all think this is so easy.
>
> > There already is a new radio forum for San Diego in the
> > works!
>
> If it's privately owned, hire good lawyers.
>
> If it's on one of those "forums for hire" sites, check the
> terms and conditions. They likely have a clause that could
> be interpreted as the right to make the forum disappear the
> instant Arbitron's attorneys even hint at legal action.
>
> You all think this is so easy.
>
C
collinsradio
Guest
Re: Privately Owned Gossip and Speculation Board.
Yea, so Mr. pouser tell us about your track record?
Why criticize Radio-Info, you ought to ashasmed of yourself
as one of the founders just passed away this week. Of course,
by using the word "hater" it's obvious you are some less than
educated kid.
Yea, so Mr. pouser tell us about your track record?
Why criticize Radio-Info, you ought to ashasmed of yourself
as one of the founders just passed away this week. Of course,
by using the word "hater" it's obvious you are some less than
educated kid.
O
OldiesCat
Guest
Gossip and Speculation
hey, man- you may have a few points in your diatribe but your timing sucks.
Timing may be everything but in this case, you are nothing.
hey, man- you may have a few points in your diatribe but your timing sucks.
Timing may be everything but in this case, you are nothing.
K
KMRichards
Guest
Re: That is an easy question to answer, actually.
> What a bunch of twisted rationale, hypocritical horseshit.
You are entitled to your opinion, but that is the way it was explained to me by the owners. You remember them ... they are the ones I answer to, although sadly there is now one less of them.
> By the way, I made sure I didn't violate "Rule 5". I'm not
> attacking you, I'm questioning your concept.
Distinction duly noted.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> What a bunch of twisted rationale, hypocritical horseshit.
You are entitled to your opinion, but that is the way it was explained to me by the owners. You remember them ... they are the ones I answer to, although sadly there is now one less of them.
> By the way, I made sure I didn't violate "Rule 5". I'm not
> attacking you, I'm questioning your concept.
Distinction duly noted.<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
D
dirkdiggler
Guest
*deleted*
Post deleted by admin: spam
Post deleted by admin: spam
Re: Privately Owned Gossip and Speculation Board.
>
>
> $250,000 combined income last year. Not bad for an
> uneducated kid.
I have the suspicion that people who really have a quarter-million income don't talk about it on message boards. Nor do they list possessions gratuitously.
>
>
> $250,000 combined income last year. Not bad for an
> uneducated kid.
I have the suspicion that people who really have a quarter-million income don't talk about it on message boards. Nor do they list possessions gratuitously.
K
KMRichards
Guest
Re: Privately Owned Gossip and Speculation Board.
> >
> >
> > $250,000 combined income last year. Not bad for an
> > uneducated kid.
>
> I have the suspicion that people who really have a
> quarter-million income don't talk about it on message
> boards. Nor do they list possessions gratuitously.
Nor do "uneducated kids" get into that income bracket legally.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
> >
> >
> > $250,000 combined income last year. Not bad for an
> > uneducated kid.
>
> I have the suspicion that people who really have a
> quarter-million income don't talk about it on message
> boards. Nor do they list possessions gratuitously.
Nor do "uneducated kids" get into that income bracket legally.
<P ID="signature">______________
</P>
- Status