• Get involved.
    We want your input!
    Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.

    After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
    If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.

    After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
    https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/

    Thanks in advance and have fun!
    RadioDiscussions Administrators

Season Premiere Sunday reminder

Re: CBS Postgame Show and "60 Minutes" (Was: Fox NFL Postgame Show)

I think what you’re proposing is a solution in need of a problem.

60 Minutes has built one of TV’s most venerable brands by being consistent in delivering a series of in-depth, longer stories packaged in a one-hour format. For the most part, the show does not delve into the Dateline style of expanding and contracting the show and altering that formula to fit various needs. (That’s not an indictment of Dateline or any other program; just a comment on the path CBS has chosen for 60 Minutes.)

For half of the country, there’s no issue to begin with, so there’s no need to invest resources (manpower, equipment, what have you), to produce mini segments that definitely won’t be seen by half of the country, and may or may not be seen by the other half. They can’t be consistent with what the rest of 60 Minutes is all about, so it cheapens the brand….and for what?

Most CBS stations and most Fox stations are in completely different situations, and the idea that CBS stations are tremendously suffering by not having their late news start at 11/10 on the dot is not reality. By and large, the CBS Sunday night movie is well programmed and delivers a strong audience, which, when the movie runs late, in turn delivers a captive audience to those seeking late news at 11:15 or 11:30…or whatever.

Die-hard viewers of a particular station will come back if they can’t wait up for the movie to end on those approximately 10 weeks or so that are impacted. Consider WPVI in Philadelphia and Monday Night Football. For 17 weeks, news viewers on Monday nights who might normally tune to Action News find another alternative, and come right back on Tuesday when the schedule goes back to normal.

Unlike CBS affiliates, many Fox affiliates have built being “first” into their overall marketing for their late news. Thus, there is more of a competitive disadvantage to shifting the newscasts. Moreover, Fox historically does not deliver, on a consistent basis, anywhere near the same size audience from 9-10 pm ET that CBS does from 10-11 pm, so, by definition, the “captive” audience for the Fox newscasts would be less valuable, making it more important to have the shows start on time more often.

CBS’s solution makes the most sense for their situation, and Fox’s approach makes more sense for them. It’s not an either/or scenario.


> But you can, besides the highly-promoted segments, schedule
> several short (5-6 minutes each) segments that can be
> dropped from an expanded-during-NFL-season version of "60
> Minutes" should the show not start on-time at 7:30 P.M. ET.
>
> For instance, a 90-minute "60 Minutes" during football
> season could contain three major segments (12-15 minutes
> each), Andy Rooney's commentary, and four short segments of
> 5-6 minutes each that aren't promoted during the week before
> the show. These short segments can be deleted if the late
> afternoon CBS NFL game runs long to insure that "60 Minutes"
> would end at 9 P.M. ET (assuming that the "NFL Today"
> postgame show were to extend to aproximately 7:30 P.M. ET).
>
 
> That said, I don't think that *overall* the show is as bad
> as some whiners make it out to be. Yes, we can do without
> the blatantly repeating plots, but there are still inspired
> moments of hunor, and it hands-down beats anything else on
> the air.
> >
>
Until last season, I would have agreed wholeheartedly with you. But, not anymore. For example:

Last night, our local Fox station in Boston showed the classic Simpson's episode when the family flashes back to 1984 and the birth of Lisa. Absolutely awesome!!! It's probably the 40th time that I've seen it, yet I laugh like an idiot each time I see it! And, there were many such classics during the course of the show.

After watching earlier classics such as that, it is very hard to argue that the last season (and so far this one) of the Simpsons has NOT jumped the shark. Really lackluster, on the whole.

And, though there are still few shows as entertaining on prime time TV as the Simpsons, it is no longer the best. Personally, I think that Family Guy has captured the top spot. Hopefully, the rest of the upcoming season will be more inspired than Sunday night's episode, but I would bet that it will be.

And, the prize for most improved player has to go to American Dad. I hope that Sunday night's iteration of the show is the beginning of a great season.
<P ID="edit"><FONT class="small">Edited by BRNout on 09/13/05 09:59 PM.</FONT></P>
 
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.


Back
Top Bottom