I live in the RGV and this is simply not true. Families are not constantly frightened. I know I am not.
-
Get involved.
We want your input!
Apply for Membership and join the conversations about everything related to broadcasting.
After we receive your registration, a moderator will review it. After your registration is approved, you will be permitted to post.
If you use a disposable or false email address, your registration will be rejected.
After your membership is approved, please take a minute to tell us a little bit about yourself.
https://www.radiodiscussions.com/forums/introduce-yourself.1088/
Thanks in advance and have fun!
RadioDiscussions Administrators
Not what my friends say. The folks who have weekend shifts or who get off in the evening think that it is far less secure than it was ten years ago and much less than, let's say, 20 years back.
Those who have kids in school are concerned about the increased numbers of people who are obviously undocumented and there is much greater concern about those involved in human and drug trafficking.
Perhaps I should use the word "cautious" or "on the alert" instead of "frightened". Would you say that is more appropriate.?
Two words are the most appropriate here: anecdotal evidence. Possibly colored by the natural human tendency to choose friends of the same political persuasion, which in your case is conservative.
I will say that there is certainly a higher sense of awareness since we are 10 miles from the Mexican border and considering all the cartel activity in Reynosa and other nearby Mexican border cities recently, there violence itself has not spread across the border as some believe. While McAllen was recently at the center of this immigration surge, the media has blown it way out of proportion as there are not scores of undocumented folks roaming the streets of McAllen stealing and causing problems. In all honesty McAllen is actually a very family friendly city with many outdoor activities occurring on weekends year round. Of course just like an any other town or city there are parts of town that are less safer then others but again that is normal in any city you go to.
I know people who do not know what NPR is, so I refer to such stations as "public radio" stations when conversing with them.
Imagine that.
This is true. The moment migrants are released, they're bused into the interior of the country. Some are even given flight vouchers if their destination is farther north.
I don't know about all that. The RGV (outside of SPI) is definitely not a place I would take my family to. Before the pandemic began, I used to travel there a lot (as well as Laredo). I didn't feel threatened in places such as McAllen or Edinburg, but I also didn't feel particularly safe. I certainly didn't feel like I could put my guard down like I could in Houston, Dallas, or San Antonio.
The entire region feels like a dystopia (there definitely is a ton of corruption down there) where the economy revolves around illegal immigration one way or another.
But that's just my perspective.
Same could be said about the counterargument. People do have a tendency to stick up for the places they live in/work in.
I have absolutely no love or hate for the places I visit for work or leisure (ok, well maybe Vegas). I will say that I usually find myself a little on edge when I visit anything south of I-37. Maybe it has something to do with the stigma? Who knows. But that's just my perspective.
Here's an interesting example:
Latin Hispanic population is now Wisconsin's largest minority group
Data from the 2020 U.S Census shows Wisconsin has a growing Hispanic community, making it the largest ethnic population in the state.
www.tmj4.com
They're not hanging around the border. They're looking for work. And right now there are lots of open jobs.
Six Lawmakers Urge FCC To ‘Thoroughly Scrutinize’ Univision’s Sale Of 18 Radio Stations.
The uproar over the sale of 18 radio stations by TelevisaUnivision to Latino Media Network (LMN) has a group of Republican lawmakers raising a red flag at the Federal Communications
Here is more.
Six Lawmakers Urge FCC To ‘Thoroughly Scrutinize’ Univision’s Sale Of 18 Radio Stations.
The uproar over the sale of 18 radio stations by TelevisaUnivision to Latino Media Network (LMN) has a group of Republican lawmakers raising a red flag at the Federal Communicationswww.insideradio.com
Here is more.
And yet when the shoe was on the other foot, FCC Republican commissioner Brendan Carr was very clear to say that the FCC can't do what these lawmakers want done:
FCC’s Brendan Carr Counters Democrats’ Move To Halt Sale Of Miami Radio Station.
The efforts by Democrats to have the FCC deny the sale of Spanish news/talk “Caracol 1260” WSUA Miami are being countered by FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr. The Republican Commissioner says
There is absolutely nothing in the FCC rules that would allow it to block a sale for political opinions. No one involved in the new group has anything that would disqualify it from ownership, and the congressmen have no evidence of the accusations they're making.
But the hopes of the Cuban refugee community in Miami is that the more attention they put on the transaction and the more controversy they associate with it, the buyers... who depend entirely on debt financing ... will lose their backing. I believe the thought is that if Soros sees this as having a negative impact among many Hispanics, he will pull out and the deal will collapse.
I think that position is oversimplified, but most of the families involved have lost relatives and friends under the socialist governments of Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua.
The mistake of the American media is in calling the protests "conservative" and "Republican" when that is not anywhere near the truth; those protesters are anti-titalitarian and anti-communist. They will support either party that does not give in to foreign or domestic leaders who support the very things that made them and their families abandon their homelands.
Then the charges being made by the congressmen are fraudulent. The FCC is not in a position to deny a sale for any of the reasons they state. Making such a demand of the FCC ignores the constitutional rights of the buyers.
Losing the financing of one backer wouldn't affect this sale. There are lots of rich Hispanics in this country who support this idea. In addition, it is the stated and documented policy of the FCC to promote and encourage minority ownership of broadcasting, which this would be. Nowhere in that stated and documented FCC policy does it say anything requiring any broadcast experience from the minority owners.
The people in the linked article are not protesters. They are employees of the government and the American people. We all pay their salaries. They are using their position to make demands of a regulatory agency that are unjust. Any rule or decision that might be made against LMN could just as easily be used against Sinclair or Salem or any other broadcaster that represents the opposite point of view.
Last edited:
No, what it ignores is that the FCC does not regulate formats or content beyond prohibitions of profanity and obscenity.
Without getting into a discussion of the shifting tide of Hispanics towards political movements that reflect religious and family values that are culturally closer to Hispanic tradition, there are Hispanics involved with media but not with social or sociopolitical goals.
No, that is just common sense. The buyers of the TelevisaUnivision stations seem to be highly lacking in that respect, or the would not be buying a package that includes 9 AM stations, most of which are not very good signals. It's widely known among people who actually know Hispanic use of radio that AM usage by Hispanics is vastly less than the usage by non-Hispanic whites.
If you mean the two women who "run" the buyer company, they were employees of the Democratic Party for most of their careers, not of the government. And they were at pretty low levels to be taking out a $90 million dollar loan for mostly AM stations with bad signals.
If you mean the politicians protesting the sale, they are representatives of those who voted for them. They believe that their constituencies support this position.
I don't think this would be the first time that an elected official asked for or voted for something that seemed beyond the definition of their positions or which was outside the scope of the action they requested. There are, of course, many cases where the FCC has been asked to regulate or censure content that is not within the scope of its authority. So this is nothing new. It will not progress.
But, as I said before, I believe that the protesting representatives hope that focusing attention on what they believe to be a negative proposition may cause the buyers to loose their financial support. In that case, they have succeeded.
It's irrelevant to the stated goals of the FCC.
It's irrelevant to this discussion.
No I mean the congressmen who were mentioned in the article. Their previous employment of the buyers is irrelevant.
How do you explain Tom Cotton? They get paid by the taxes of all Americans, not just their constituents. They also represent the Democrats who also live in their state. That's the part of this ideologues don't understand. They don't just represent the people who agree with them. They are supposed to represent everyone. That was the part of the civics lesson they ignored.
The buyers have faced opposition before. They are Hispanic women. They have seen it a lot, especially from men.
The buyer is George Soros. The women are irrelevant figureheads; they were recruited to put a female Hispanic front on the project.
His name is not in the application. He is not the buyer. The money is several steps removed from him.
That comment is very disrespectful to the women who are leading this project.
Stating that the women were simply party activists in relatively minor positions within the machinery is not disrespectful; it is just objective. Alone, without Soros' funding, they could not buy a Tesla let alone a $90 million dollar funded group of radio stations. The money is almost entirely from Soros' lending organization. While there are a handful of 1% participants, none have put up more than a low, low 6-figures worth of cash and their signatures on the loan paperwork.
The two women have zero radio experience. One does not even know conversational Spanish and the other is apparently just barely able to order at Taco Bell.
This is truly Ian Van Dahl's "Castles in the Sky". The lyrics fit marvelously.
That's not what you said. You said they were "irrelevant figureheads." It's not true, and it IS disrespectful.
Same with Mary Berner. Their language skills are irrelevant to this discussion. The FCC doesn't require a language test or any radio experience to own radio stations. There is no real case to be made. All one can bring is anger and prejudice.
Inside Radio did an update today on the archive story I posted earlier in this thread. The FCC is not pursuing an investigation into the sale of an AM station in Miami:
www.insideradio.com
The story was revived because a group of Republican congressmen have asked for a similar investigation about the Univision sale.
FCC Rejects Call To Dig Into Controversial Miami Sale After Deal Was Scrapped.
Despite calls from Congress to investigate the now-scuttled sale of “Caracol 1260” WSUA Miami, FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel says the Media Bureau is no longer actively investigating the station or
The story was revived because a group of Republican congressmen have asked for a similar investigation about the Univision sale.
Last edited:
- Status